- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT07583082
Validation of an Ex Vivo Calf Brain Force Detection System for Neurosurgical Simulation Training
Validation of an Ex Vivo Calf Brain Force Detection System for Neurosurgical Simulation Training: A Case Series Study
Neurosurgery is a high-stakes surgical specialty where errors can result in significant patient mortality and morbidity. The amount of force applied on the brain simultaneously by the multiple different instruments during complex neurosurgical procedures is a critical safety metric that, to the investigators' knowledge, has not been previously measured in a realistic operative environment.
The investigators have therefore developed a simulation platform integrating an ex vivo calf brain and a 3D-printed skull model attached to a force sensor capable of capturing real-time forces applied to the brain. A cross-sectional case series study will be conducted to evaluate the validity of the system. Medical students, neurosurgical residents, neurosurgical fellows, and staff neurosurgeons from four Quebec institutions will be recruited to perform three simulated subpial resections each using our ex vivo calf brain simulation platform. The forces applied by the microscissors, bipolar forceps, and ultrasonic aspirator onto the brain will be captured along with kinematic data. This study aims to establish the face, content, construct, and convergent validity of this ex vivo calf brain force detection system.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Background and Rationale: The subpial resection technique is a complex neurosurgical procedure that is essential for brain tumor and epilepsy surgery. However, opportunities for trainees to gain hands-on experience with this procedure without risk to patient safety are limited. The force applied on the brain during tool-tissue contact is a critical factor impacting patient safety. While virtual simulation platforms enable force monitoring, ex vivo animal brains cannot readily capture quantitative data. The investigators have therefore developed a prototype of a simulation platform that integrates a force sensor and a calf brain and can accurately detect real-time forces during simulated subpial resections. This study seeks to investigate the validity of this ex vivo calf brain force detection system.
Hypotheses:
- The forces applied by instruments on an ex vivo calf brain during simulated subpial resection procedures will significantly differ between novice, intermediate, and expert participants.
- The ex vivo calf brain force detection system will demonstrate face, content, construct, and convergent validity.
- Levels of negative emotions, stress, and cognitive load will be greater in surgical trainees compared with experts.
Primary Objective: To measure and compare the forces applied by novice, intermediate, and expert participants during simulated ex vivo subpial resection procedures.
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the face, content, construct, and convergent validity of the ex vivo calf brain force measurement setup.
- To determine how the simulation platform influences emotions, stress, and cognitive load of participants of different expertise levels.
Setting: McGill University Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital.
Participants:
Neurosurgeons (experts): Staff neurosurgeons at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval specializing in oncology, epilepsy, pediatric, or vascular neurosurgery.
Neurosurgical fellows (trainees): Neurosurgical fellows at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval specializing in oncology, epilepsy, pediatric, or vascular neurosurgery.
Neurosurgical residents (trainees): Neurosurgical residents at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval.
Medical students (novices): Students enrolled in medical school at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval.
Design: A cross-sectional case series study.
Methodology: This study was approved by the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board, Neurosciences-Psychiatry. A case series study will be conducted where medical students, neurosurgical residents, neurosurgical fellows, and staff neurosurgeons from four Quebec institutions will be recruited to perform subpial resection tasks on an ex vivo calf brain model. Calf brains will be placed in a 3D-printed skull model to mimic a realistic human operative environment. The 3D-printed skull model was prototyped from a publicly available CT scan obtained from Embodi3D, an open-access medical imaging repository, and reconstructed in 3D using the open-source software 3D Slicer version 5.10.0. A 6-degree-of-freedom force/torque sensor (Nano17 IP68, ATI Industrial Automation Inc., North Carolina, USA) and a USB data acquisition board (NI-6210, National Instruments Inc., Texas, USA) will be used to measure real-time forces applied to the brain. Participants will use microscissors, bipolar forceps, and a SONOPET ultrasonic aspirator (Stryker, Portage, Michigan, USA) to perform each simulated procedure. All three surgical instruments will be continuously tracked using infrared cameras, allowing kinematic data (velocity, acceleration, and jerk) of each instrument to be derived. The tasks will be performed using an OPMI pico surgical microscope (ZEISS, Jena, Germany) and video-recorded using a Blackfly S GigE embedded microscope camera (FLIR, Wilsonville, Oregon, USA), allowing a broader instrument view for evaluation of tracking data and postoperative performance. Before, during, and after the trial, all participants will self-report their emotions using Medical Emotions Scale (MES) and their stress using the Short Stress State Questionnaire (SSSQ) on 7-point Likert scales. All participants will also report their cognitive load after the trial using the Cognitive Load Index (CLI) on 5-point Likert scales and the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) on 7-point Likert scales. Expert participants will fill out questionnaires assessing the face and content validity of the ex vivo calf brain force detection setup on 7-point Likert scales. Blinded expert raters will watch the videos of each procedure and grade it using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) rating scale to determine the simulation platform's construct and convergent validity.
Study Procedure: Upon arrival, participants will read and sign an informed consent form. They will then fill out a pre-trial questionnaire assessing their demographic characteristics (e.g., sex, gender, age, institutional affiliation, etc.) as well as their baseline emotions and stress. Each participant will receive standardized written instructions on instrument use and function and presented with an image outlining the location of the three subpial resections on the ex vivo calf brain in front of them. Participants will adjust the operating microscope according to their preferences. The resections will be performed using microscissors to make an initial incision in the pia mater, bipolar forceps to lift the pia, and an ultrasonic aspirator to remove the assigned cortical area. After the first and second tasks, participants will fill out questionnaires assessing their emotions and stress once more. Finally, after the third task, novice and trainee participants will fill out a post-trial questionnaire assessing their emotions, stress, and cognitive load. Expert participants will fill out face and content validity questionnaires, followed by the post-trial questionnaire.
Significance: This study will provide validity evidence to support the educational utility of a novel ex vivo calf brain force detection system using both traditional and contemporary frameworks. For the first time in a realistic operative environment, it will be possible to monitor the force applied on the brain. The force and kinematic data collected from this case series study will be used to build an intelligent tutoring system capable of monitoring performance and mitigating errors during human surgical procedures.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Estimado)
Contactos e Locais
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Bianca Giglio, MSc
- Número de telefone: 514-802-1608
- E-mail: bianca.giglio@mail.mcgill.ca
Estude backup de contato
- Nome: Mohammed Babgi, MD
- E-mail: mohammed.babgi@mail.mcgill.ca
Locais de estudo
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canadá, H3A 2B4
- Neuro Imaging and Surgical Technologies Lab, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Método de amostragem
População do estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Medical students, neurosurgical residents, neurosurgical fellows, and staff neurosurgeons from one of four Quebec institutions who do not fit the exclusion criteria.
Exclusion Criteria:
- For medical students, participation in a previous trial where they received training on the NeuroVR surgical simulator or the ex vivo calf brain simulation model.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Forces applied to the brain during each simulated subpial resection procedure
Prazo: 1 day of study
|
Throughout each simulated ex vivo subpial resection procedure, forces applied to the brain during tool-tissue contact will be measured by the force/torque sensor in grams and Newtons.
This will enable for the assessment of differences in force applied by novice, intermediate, and expert participants.
|
1 day of study
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Face validity questionnaire responses
Prazo: 1 day of study
|
Expert participants will fill out face validity questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales after the trial to assess the realism of the simulation platform, with 1 indicating lowest realism and 7 indicating highest realism.
|
1 day of study
|
|
Content validity questionnaire responses
Prazo: 1 day of study
|
Expert participants will fill out content validity questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales after the trial to assess the educational utility of the simulation platform, with 1 indicating lowest utility and 7 indicating highest utility.
|
1 day of study
|
|
Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scores for each simulated subpial resection procedure
Prazo: 1 day of study
|
Blinded expert raters will review videos of each procedure and grade them using a modified OSATS rating scale on 7-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating worse performance and 7 indicating better performance.
This will allow for the assessment of differences in performance between each expertise group, providing evidence of the platform's construct and convergent validity.
|
1 day of study
|
|
Strength of emotions elicited
Prazo: 1 day of study
|
Measured using the Medical Emotions Scale (MES) before the trial and after each of three simulated subpial resections.
Participants self-reported emotional states via questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating lowest intensity and 7 indicating highest intensity.
|
1 day of study
|
|
Levels of stress
Prazo: 1 day of study
|
Measured using the Short Stress State Questionnaire (SSSQ) before the trial and after each of three simulated subpial resections.
Participants self-reported stress states via questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating lowest intensity and 7 indicating highest intensity.
|
1 day of study
|
|
Levels of cognitive load
Prazo: 1 day of study
|
Measured using the Cognitive Load Index (CLI) after the trial.
Participants self-reported cognitive load via questionnaires on 5-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating lowest intensity and 5 indicating highest intensity.
|
1 day of study
|
|
Levels of cognitive load
Prazo: 1 day of study
|
Measured using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) after the trial.
Participants self-reported cognitive load via questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating lowest intensity and 7 indicating highest intensity.
|
1 day of study
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Rolando F. Del Maestro, MD, PhD, Neurosurgical Simulation and Artificial Intelligence Learning Centre, McGill University
- Diretor de estudo: Amir Hooshiar, PhD, Surgical Performance Enhancement and Robotics Centre, McGill University
- Diretor de estudo: Houssem-Eddine Gueziri, PhD, Laboratoire sur la science des données, Université TÉLUQ
- Diretor de estudo: D. Louis Collins, PhD, Neuro Imaging and Surgical Technologies Lab, McGill University
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Estimado)
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 2018 4395
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD
Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD
Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
- SEIVA
- CIF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .