Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Simulation-Based Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound Program to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Acute Heart Failure Patients

11 de maio de 2026 atualizado por: Duke University

Co-design and Implementation of a Simulation-Based Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound Program to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Acute Heart Failure Patients

The aim of this study is to co-design a cardiac POCUS simulation training intervention and implementation strategy for EM clinicians and evaluate the effectiveness of the cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) simulation-based training (CPST) and CPG implementation. By performing this study, the investigators hope to improve diagnostic processes and time-to-diuretic dosing for acute heart failure (AHF) patients.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Ainda não está recrutando

Condições

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

Cardiac disease is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with over 6.7 million Americans with acute heart failure (AHF) presenting with 1 million annual emergency department (ED) visits. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a critical bedside tool that can expedite diagnosis and treatment in AHF patients. However, gaps in POCUS training remain that limit clinical utilization. Simulation-based training reinforces technical skills for clinical application. Prior work achieved high procedural knowledge (70% passed, 18% SD) and technical skills (95%, 6% SD) in emergency medicine (EM) clinicians using a simulation nerve block model, with retention at 3-months post-intervention. The current proposed study builds on this work, using the Implementation Research Longitudinal Framework (IRLM) to translate knowledge into clinical skills through simulation-based POCUS training for EM physicians and Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) to improve time-to-diuretics and AHF patient clinical outcomes. Specific Aim 1 uses adaptive Experience-Based Co-design (EBCD) to co-design a cardiac POCUS simulation training intervention and implementation strategy for EM clinicians The cardiac POCUS training workshop and reinforcement sessions will be co-designed with ED leadership, ultrasound faculty, and key stakeholders. Participants will then perform cardiac and lung POCUS using standardized clinical practice guidelines (CPG) in AHF patients as part of clinical care. Specific Aim 2 is the intervention assessment. We will assess pre-, post, and 6-month post-simulation participant POCUS skills using validated ultrasound self-efficacy scales, image interpretation tests (knowledge), and simulated scenario performance (technical skills). Specific Aim 3 evaluates the effectiveness of the cardiac POCUS simulation-based training and clinical practice guideline implementation. The investigators will perform a quasi-experimental pre-/post design by interrupted time series with one year of data before and after intervention implementation. We will perform a quasi-experimental pre-/post design interrupted time series with one year of data before and after intervention implementation in three diverse EDs. Our primary clinical outcome is time-to-diuretic dose in ED heart failure patients.11 PROCTOR-guided outcomes include effectiveness, provider adoption, and clinical POCUS uptake/utilization.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

175

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency medicine provider practicing at the study site, including physician assistants and nurse practitioners

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ED nurses and technicians are excluded due to differing ultrasound training needs

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Diagnóstico
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição sequencial
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Duke University Hospital emergency medicine physicians and Advanced Practice Providers (APPs)
Co-designed simulation training intervention and clinical practice guidelines implemenation
Comportamental: Simulation POCUS training
Uses adaptive Experience-Based Co-design (EBCD) to co-design a cardiac POCUS simulation training intervention and implementation strategy for EM clinicians. The cardiac POCUS training workshop and reinforcement sessions will be co-designed with ED leadership, ultrasound faculty, and key stakeholders. Participants will then perform cardiac and lung POCUS using standardized clinical practice guidelines (CPG) in AHF patients as part of clinical care.
Comportamental: Clinical Practice Guidelines
Clinical practice guidelines will instruct clinicians on how to perform POCUS, save the images, complete worksheets on the archiving platform, and signed so that images are saved to the patient's chart and billed.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Effectiveness of the simulation-based cardiac POCUS (Point-of-Care Ultrasound) training implementation as measured by time-to-diuretic dose in ED (Emergency Department) heart failure patients
Prazo: 12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
Time-to-diuretics (units in minutes) in patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction.
12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Acceptability of the Intervention as measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Prazo: up to 6 months post-workshop
The AIM is scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where a higher score indicates greater acceptability.
up to 6 months post-workshop
Appropriateness of the Intervention as measured by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Prazo: up to 6 months post-workshop
The IAM is scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where a higher score indicates greater appropriateness.
up to 6 months post-workshop
Feasibility of the Intervention as measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) survey tool
Prazo: up to 6 months post-workshop
The FIM is scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where a higher score indicates greater appropriateness.
up to 6 months post-workshop
Feasibility of implementing a cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) simulation training and clinical practice guidelines for physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs)
Prazo: 12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
Using a modified framework analysis approach, a team of 3-4 trained research assistants and ultrasound faculty led by an implementation science expert will deductively analyze semi-structured interview content based on IRLM constructs and PROCTOR outcomes, with open inductive coding for data that does not fit into the framework. A preliminary rapid qualitative deductive analysis will be performed based on audio recordings and meeting notes applied to the PROCTOR dimensions, to determine scope and saturation. Coding and categorization will be conducted with PROCTOR-templated coding sheets and transferred to NVivo.
12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
Effectiveness of the simulation-based cardiac POCUS training implementation as measured by the number of clinical POCUS performed in the ED
Prazo: 12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
To assess the cardiac POCUS simulation training program effectiveness, the investigators will collect pre/post-health record data on the number of clinical POCUS performed in the emergency department pre/post-intervention (from the Butterfly ultrasound archiving system, units in counts/percentages).
12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
Effectiveness of the simulation-based cardiac POCUS training implementation as measured by image quality review scores
Prazo: 12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
To assess cardiac POCUS simulation training program effectiveness, the investigators will collect pre/post-health record data on image quality review scores (determine by two ultrasound experts, Likert scale 1-5, where a higher score indicates greater quality).
12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance as measured by the time to initial cardiology consult
Prazo: 12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
The investigators will collect electronic health record data on pre/post-intervention time to initial cardiology consult (both from the Epic electronic health record, units in hours).
12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance as measured by emergency department length-of-stay
Prazo: 12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
The investigators will collect electronic health record data on pre/post-intervention ED length-of-stay (from the Epic electronic health record, units in hours).
12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
Clinical impact of the training model on heart failure patients as measured by the number of participants with serious cardiac outcomes
Prazo: 12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
The investigators will collect pre/post-intervention 30-day serious cardiac outcomes including 30-day mortality, ventilation, new dialysis, myocardial infarction (from the Epic electronic health record, units in counts/percentages).
12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
Ultrasound Self-efficacy Scale
Prazo: 6 months
Post-workshop assessments will assess participant skills via validated Ultrasound Self-efficacy Scale, which is reported on a scale of 1 to 5. A higher score indicates greater self-efficacy.
6 months
Provider adoption as measured by the number of cardiac/lung POCUS exams performed by each participant for ED acute heart failure patients
Prazo: 12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
Ultrasound image interpretation test
Prazo: 6 months
Post-workshop assessments will assess participant skills via validated ultrasound image interpretation tests (knowledge assessment survey, 11 questions multiple choice). Scores range from 0 to 11, where a higher score indicates greater knowledge.
6 months
Ultrasound Competency Assessment Test (UCAT)
Prazo: 6 months
Post-workshop assessments will assess participant skills via validated ultrasound simulated scenario performance and technical skills using the UCAT. The score ranges from 1 ("I had to do", total supervisor intervention) to 5 ("I did not need to be there", independent). Higher scores indicate greater competency.
6 months
Cost-effectiveness as measured by POCUS (Point-of-Care Ultrasound) revenue
Prazo: 12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention
Number of dollars billed at a flat rate for each procedure type from the Butterfly enterprise and hospital clinical billing data archive, units in dollars.
12 months pre and 12 months post-intervention

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Duke University

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Rebecca Theophanous, Duke University

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de setembro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

31 de dezembro de 2030

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

31 de dezembro de 2030

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

19 de março de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

11 de maio de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

18 de maio de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

18 de maio de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

11 de maio de 2026

Última verificação

1 de maio de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Palavras-chave

Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • Pro00120135

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Descrição do plano IPD

All data will be collected in hospital secured platforms including Duke REDCap, the current clinical Butterfly Enterprise POCUS archiving system, and Epic electronic health records. All data will be de-identified at the collection step and kept as de-identified data for our research purposes. Data will be collected in digital format and stored using standardized file types such as .csv, .txt, .docx, .mp3. The total data volume will cover about 175 participants across 2-3 hospital sites.

The research community will have access to data when the award ends. As required by NHLBI, studies will also be created that contain the data used for every publication. Those studies will be shared when the pre-print is available and have digital object identifiers (DOI) to aid in findability. The investigators will include the DOI in relevant publications. NHLBI will make decisions about how long to preserve the data.

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever