Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Ultrasound-Guided Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Local Anesthetic Injection for Chronic Neuroma Pain After Combat-Related Amputation (PRP-NEUROMA)

30 de maio de 2026 atualizado por: Dmytro Dmytriiev, Ukrainian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Therapy

Ultrasound-Guided Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Local Anesthetic Injection for Chronic Neuroma Pain After Combat-Related Amputation: A Prospective Multicenter Controlled Study

Patients with combat-related amputations frequently experience chronic neuroma pain that may interfere with rehabilitation, prosthesis use, mobility, sleep, and quality of life. Current treatment approaches often provide only temporary pain relief.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a potential regenerative treatment option because of its possible effects on tissue healing, neuroinflammation, and peripheral nerve irritation. However, its role in the treatment of chronic neuroma pain after amputation remains unclear.

This prospective multicenter controlled study aims to compare ultrasound-guided PRP injection around the neuroma with ultrasound-guided local anesthetic injection in patients with chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation.

Participants will undergo one of the two injection treatments and will be followed over time to evaluate changes in pain intensity, neuropathic pain symptoms, phantom limb pain, prosthesis tolerance, and functional outcomes.

The goal of the study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and potential clinical effectiveness of PRP injection for chronic neuroma pain following combat-related amputation.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Chronic neuroma pain is a frequent and disabling complication following combat-related limb trauma and amputation. Persistent neuroma pain may contribute to residual limb pain, phantom limb pain, impaired prosthesis tolerance, sleep disturbance, reduced mobility, and decreased quality of life. Conventional treatment strategies, including local anesthetic injections, often provide only temporary pain relief and limited long-term functional improvement.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a potential regenerative treatment option because of its possible effects on tissue repair, neuroinflammation, peripheral sensitization, and scar-related nerve irritation. PRP contains multiple growth factors and bioactive molecules that may support peripheral nerve healing and modulation of chronic neuropathic pain mechanisms. However, evidence regarding PRP treatment for chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation remains limited.

This prospective multicenter controlled study is designed to compare ultrasound-guided PRP injection around the neuroma with ultrasound-guided local anesthetic injection in patients with chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation.

Patients with ultrasound-confirmed painful neuromas will undergo ultrasound-guided perineuroma injection using either PRP or local anesthetic according to the study protocol. All procedures will be performed under sterile conditions by clinicians experienced in ultrasound-guided pain interventions.

Clinical follow-up will include assessment of neuroma pain intensity, neuropathic pain characteristics, phantom limb pain, residual limb pain, prosthesis tolerance, analgesic consumption, patient-reported improvement, and adverse events.

The study aims to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and potential clinical effectiveness of PRP injection as a regenerative treatment strategy for chronic neuroma pain following combat-related amputation.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

100

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Locais de estudo

      • Kyiv, Ucrânia, 03143
        • Feofaniya Clinical Hospital
        • Contato:
          • Andrii Khomenko, MD
          • Número de telefone: +380937635858
          • E-mail: farmen@ukr.net
      • Vinnytsia, Ucrânia, 21000
        • Vinnitsya university hospital
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Combat-related limb amputation
  • Chronic neuroma pain lasting ≥3 months
  • Ultrasound-confirmed painful neuroma
  • Average neuroma pain intensity ≥4/10 on the Numeric Rating Scale
  • Persistent pain interfering with rehabilitation, prosthesis use, or daily activities
  • Ability to undergo ultrasound-guided injection
  • Stable analgesic regimen for at least 14 days before enrollment
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active infection at or near the injection site
  • Open wound preventing safe injection
  • Previous PRP injection for neuroma pain within 6 months
  • Previous neuroma surgery within 3 months
  • Severe coagulopathy or platelet disorder
  • Anticoagulant therapy contraindicating injection
  • Active malignancy
  • Severe uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics
  • Inability to complete follow-up assessments

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Não randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Triplo

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: PRP Injection Around Neuroma
Ultrasound-guided perineuroma platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection performed for treatment of chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation. PRP will be prepared using autologous blood and injected under sterile conditions around the ultrasound-confirmed painful neuroma.
Ultrasound-guided perineuroma platelet-rich plasma injection performed around the ultrasound-confirmed painful neuroma for treatment of chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation.
Comparador Ativo: Local Anesthetic Injection
Ultrasound-guided perineuroma local anesthetic injection performed for treatment of chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation under sterile conditions around the ultrasound-confirmed painful neuroma.
Ultrasound-guided perineuroma local anesthetic injection performed around the ultrasound-confirmed painful neuroma for treatment of chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation.
Outros nomes:
  • Lidocaína
  • Bupivacaina

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change in Chronic Neuroma Pain Intensity Assessed Using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Prazo: Baseline to 12 weeks after injection

Chronic neuroma pain intensity will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Participants will rate their average neuroma-related pain during the previous 7 days on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst imaginable pain." Change from baseline will be analyzed.

Scale Information:

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

Minimum Value:

0

Maximum Value:

10 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater neuroma pain intensity and worse clinical outcomes.

Baseline to 12 weeks after injection

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Neuropathic Pain Characteristics Assessed Using the painDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q)
Prazo: Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks

Neuropathic pain characteristics will be assessed using the painDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q), a validated patient-reported screening tool designed to identify neuropathic pain features. The questionnaire evaluates pain quality, sensory symptoms, pain pattern, and radiation of pain. Total scores range from -1 to 38, with higher scores indicating a greater likelihood and severity of neuropathic pain.

Scale Information:

painDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q)

Minimum Value:

1

Maximum Value:

38

Interpretation:

Higher scores indicate more pronounced neuropathic pain characteristics and a greater likelihood of neuropathic pain.

Clinical Interpretation:

≤12 = Neuropathic pain unlikely 13-18 = Ambiguous result

≥19 = Neuropathic pain likely

Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks
Residual Limb Pain Intensity
Prazo: Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks

Residual limb pain intensity will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Participants will rate their average residual limb pain during the previous 7 days on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst imaginable pain."

Scale Information:

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Minimum Value: 0 Maximum Value: 10 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater residual limb pain intensity and worse clinical outcomes.

Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks
Prosthesis Tolerance Assessed Using Average Daily Prosthesis Wearing Time
Prazo: Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks

Prosthesis tolerance will be assessed by measuring the average daily duration of prosthesis use reported by the participant. Prosthesis wearing time reflects the participant's ability to comfortably use the prosthesis during daily activities and rehabilitation.

Measurement:

Average daily prosthesis wearing time

Unit of Measure:

Hours per day (hours/day)

Minimum Value:

0 hours/day

Maximum Value:

24 hours/day

Interpretation:

Higher values indicate better prosthesis tolerance and greater successful adaptation to prosthetic use.

Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks

Outras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Analgesic Consumption Assessed as Oral Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (OMEDD)
Prazo: Baseline to 24 weeks

Analgesic consumption will be assessed by calculating the total daily opioid use and converting all opioid medications into Oral Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (OMEDD) using established conversion factors. The average daily opioid requirement will be recorded throughout the study period.

Measurement:

Oral Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (OMEDD)

Unit of Measure:

Milligrams per day (mg/day)

Minimum Value:

0 mg/day

Maximum Value:

No predefined maximum value Interpretation: Higher values indicate greater analgesic requirements and potentially more severe pain.

Baseline to 24 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

15 de dezembro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

15 de dezembro de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

15 de dezembro de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

23 de maio de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

30 de maio de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

3 de junho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

3 de junho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

30 de maio de 2026

Última verificação

1 de maio de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

SIM

Descrição do plano IPD

De-identified individual participant data including demographic characteristics, ultrasound findings, chronic neuroma pain intensity scores, neuropathic pain assessments, phantom limb pain measures, residual limb pain outcomes, prosthesis tolerance assessments, analgesic consumption, adverse events, and follow-up clinical evaluations collected during the study will be available for sharing. The study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and analytic code may also be shared upon reasonable request.

Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD

Beginning 6 months after publication of the primary study results and ending 5 years after publication.

Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD

De-identified individual participant data and supporting study documents will be available to qualified researchers, clinicians, and academic institutions upon reasonable request to the study investigators. Shared materials may include demographic data, ultrasound findings, pain assessments, follow-up outcomes, study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and analytic code. Requests will be reviewed for scientific validity, ethical compliance, and data protection considerations. Data access will be provided through secure institutional communication and data-sharing agreements when applicable.

Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
  • SEIVA

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever