Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Addressing HPV Vaccine Hesitancy by Co-Designing a Digital Health Intervention (HPV-END-IT)

2 de junho de 2026 atualizado por: Sibylle Herzig van Wees, Karolinska Institutet

HPV-Kompassen: a Mixed-Methods Single-Arm Cluster Feasibility Study of a Co-Designed Web-Based Intervention To Strengthen HPV Vaccine Confidence and Uptake in Stockholm, Sweden

This study looks at a digital platform that supports HPV vaccination in schools. The goal is to see if it is useful, easy to use, and practical in real school settings, especially in areas where fewer people get vaccinated.

Researchers will give Year 5 pupils (aged 11-12) and their parents or caregivers access to the platform. It provides clear, trusted information about the HPV vaccine for young people, parents, and school nurses. The aim is to make the vaccine easier to understand and to help answer any questions or concerns.

After using the platform, participants will be asked to share their thoughts.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Ainda não está recrutando

Condições

Intervenção / Tratamento

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

100

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Filho
  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

We will aim to recruit 6-8 compulsory schools in Stockholm County to serve as clusters.

All Year 5 pupils and their caregivers in the study schools are invited.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The school provides education to pupils in school year 5 and is scheduled to be open throughout the pilot trial period
  • The school is located in an area with HPV vaccine uptake <85.2% (the Stockholm regional average)
  • The head principal and school nurse both consent to participate
  • The school has the capacity to implement the intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to meet the inclusion criteria

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Outro
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Intervention arm
Participants in the intervention arm receive access to the co-designed, digital platform HPV-Kompassen (eng: The HPV Compass).
Comportamental: HPV-Kompassen
HPV-Kompassen is a co-designed, web-based platform that provides tailored and synthesised information with the aim of strengthening confidence in and uptake of the HPV vaccine.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Feasibility of implementation: Acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of implementation
Prazo: Shortly after the intervention period (i.e., 'end of treatment') at 7 months.

Measured using Weiner et al.'s implementation outcomes questionnaire (administered to school nurses in participating schools). The questionnaire consists of 12 statements, with four items each assessing the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM).

Respondents rate their level of agreement with each statement using a five-point Likert scale, ranging from "completely disagree" to "completely agree." Responses are coded numerically from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating stronger agreement. The 12 scores are summed to produce a total scale score ranging from 12 to 60, with higher scores reflecting more positive perceptions of the platform across the three implementation domains.
Shortly after the intervention period (i.e., 'end of treatment') at 7 months.
Feasibility of implementation: Acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of implementation
Prazo: Shortly after the intervention period (i.e., 'end of treatment') at 7 months.
Qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured interviews with school nurses in participating schools. An interview guide developed guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used to ensure consistency while allowing flexibility to explore individual experiences in depth. The guide includes open-ended questions designed to capture perceptions (see outcome measure 5) and questions related to implementation, e.g., 'How did you experience implementing HPV-Kompassen alongside the regular school health services program?' and 'How well did HPV-Kompassen fit with how schools provide information about HPV vaccination?'.
Shortly after the intervention period (i.e., 'end of treatment') at 7 months.
Acceptability of intervention: Intervention delivery strategy
Prazo: Throughout the intervention period (i.e., months 0-7).
Defined as proportion of adolescents and caregivers that access platform at least once, measured through platform usage metrics.
Throughout the intervention period (i.e., months 0-7).
Acceptability of intervention: Usability of intervention
Prazo: Immediately after the intervention period (i.e., 'end of treatment') at 7 months.
Usability is measured quantitatively using the Swedish version of the System Usability Scale (SUS). The SUS consists of 10 items assessing perceived usability across key dimensions such as complexity, ease of use, and confidence in using the system. Participants (school nurses, adolescents and caregivers) indicate their agreement with each item on a five-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." Responses are scored according to standard SUS procedures, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived usability.
Immediately after the intervention period (i.e., 'end of treatment') at 7 months.
Acceptability of intervention: Perceptions of intervention
Prazo: Shortly after the intervention period (i.e., 'end of treatment') at 7 months.
Qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured interviews with participants (school nurses, adolescents and caregivers), focusing on their perceptions of the intervention. An interview guide is used to ensure coverage of key domains while allowing flexibility to explore individual experiences in depth. The guide includes open-ended questions assessing implementation (see outcome measure 2) and perceptions of the intervention, such as "Can you briefly describe your experience of using HPV-Kompassen?" and "Did the information seem credible to you?".
Shortly after the intervention period (i.e., 'end of treatment') at 7 months.
Acceptability of intervention: Intervention engagement
Prazo: Throughout the intervention period (i.e., months 0-7).
Defined as proportion of adolescents and caregivers that actively engage with the platform least once (e.g., visit different modules), measured through platform usage metrics.
Throughout the intervention period (i.e., months 0-7).
Acceptability of intervention: Intervention engagement
Prazo: End of intervention period (i.e., 'end of treatment') at 7 months.
Qualitative data collection using semi-structured interviews. These interviews aim to understand how, why, and to what extent participants engaged with the platform in practice. Participants (school nurses, adolescents and caregivers) are asked open-ended questions such as "Why did you choose to use the platform?" and "Why did you not use the platform, or use it less than expected?" Additional questions explore when and how the platform was accessed, which features were used, and what factors influenced engagement (e.g., time constraints, relevance of content, or integration with existing workflows).
End of intervention period (i.e., 'end of treatment') at 7 months.
Feasibility of trial protocol: Feasibility of recruitment
Prazo: From start of school enrollment (i.e., pre-intervention) and throughout the intervention period (i.e., months 0-7).
Measured through study notes, assessing two indicators: proportion of schools that consent to participate and proportion of participants that consent to participate in interviews.
From start of school enrollment (i.e., pre-intervention) and throughout the intervention period (i.e., months 0-7).
Feasibility of trial protocol: Participant retention
Prazo: From school enrollment (i.e., 'baseline') and throughout the intervention period (i.e., months 0-7).
Measured using study records and platform metrics, assessing two indicators: Proportion of schools retained until study end and proportion of participants using platform who complete the end line survey.
From school enrollment (i.e., 'baseline') and throughout the intervention period (i.e., months 0-7).
Feasibility of trial protocol: Feasibility of data collection methods
Prazo: Shortly after the intervention period (i.e., 'end of treatment') at 7 months.
Measured using study records and survey data, assessing the completeness of data.
Shortly after the intervention period (i.e., 'end of treatment') at 7 months.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Karolinska Institutet

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Sibylle Herzig van Wees, Associate Professor, Karolinska Institutet

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de agosto de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de junho de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de junho de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

27 de maio de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

2 de junho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

8 de junho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

8 de junho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

2 de junho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de maio de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Palavras-chave

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 2023-00331

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever