Effects of Clinical Based Versus Synchronized Telerehabilitation on Pain, Exercise Adherence, and Functional Disability Among Patients With Grade-II Cervical Spondylosis.
25 de junho de 2026 atualizado por: Dr. Khizra Hamid, Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of clinical-based rehabilitation and synchronized telerehabilitation on pain, exercise adherence, and functional disability in patients with Grade-II cervical spondylosis.
A total of 52 participants will be randomly allocated into two parallel groups.
Both groups will receive a standardized 6-week rehabilitation program, including cervical mobility exercises, strengthening, isometric exercises, stretching, and Mulligan self-mobilization techniques.
The clinical group will receive in-person physiotherapy, while the telerehabilitation group will undergo real-time supervised sessions via video conferencing.
Outcome measures will include pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), functional disability (Neck Disability Index), and exercise adherence (Exercise Adherence Rating Scale), assessed at baseline and post-intervention.
The study aims to determine whether synchronized telerehabilitation is as effective as clinical-based rehabilitation and may provide a more accessible alternative for delivering physiotherapy care.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Ainda não está recrutando
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Cervical spondylosis is a common degenerative condition of the cervical spine characterized by disc degeneration, osteophyte formation, and reduced cervical mobility, leading to neck pain and functional limitations. Grade-II cervical spondylosis represents a stage where patients are symptomatic but remain suitable for conservative management. Physiotherapy, particularly exercise-based rehabilitation, is widely used to improve pain, mobility, and functional capacity through strengthening, stretching, and neuromuscular re-education.
Clinical-based rehabilitation provides in-person physiotherapy with direct supervision, manual guidance, and real-time correction of exercises. However, access to such care is often limited due to barriers such as travel distance, cost, and time constraints. Synchronized telerehabilitation, delivered through real-time video conferencing, offers a potential alternative by enabling remote supervision, feedback, and patient engagement while maintaining continuity of care.
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of clinical-based rehabilitation and synchronized telerehabilitation in patients with Grade-II cervical spondylosis. A total of 52 participants will be randomly assigned to two parallel groups. Both groups will receive a standardized 6-week rehabilitation program consisting of cervical range-of-motion exercises, deep cervical muscle strengthening, isometric exercises, stretching of the upper trapezius and levator scapulae, and Mulligan self-mobilization techniques (SNAGs). The clinical group will attend in-person sessions, while the telerehabilitation group will receive real-time supervised sessions via video conferencing.
Outcome measures include pain intensity assessed by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), functional disability measured by the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and exercise adherence evaluated using the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS), assessed at baseline and post-intervention.This study aims to determine whether synchronized telerehabilitation is comparable to clinical-based rehabilitation and may provide an accessible, cost-effective alternative for delivering physiotherapy care
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Estimado)
52
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Shoaib Waqas
- Número de telefone: +923024552109
- E-mail: shoaibwaqas@gmail.com
Locais de estudo
-
-
Punjab Province
-
Lahore, Punjab Province, Paquistão, 54000
- University of biological and applied sciences
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Middle age adults (45-64) years
- Both gender ( male and female )
- Clinical daignosis of cervical spondylosis grade 2
- Mild to moderate pain on NPRS
- Sub acute stage ( 2-6 weeks) of grade 2 cervical spondylosis
- Able to follow instructions and give informed consent (cognitively able) Neurologically stable
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior cervical spine surgery within the last 1 months or cervical instability.
- Inflammtory or systemic rheumatologic disease affecting the cervical spine (e.g., active rheumatoid arthritis ) or infection, tumor, fracture.
- Severe cardiopulmonary or other medical comorbidity that contraindicates exercise (unstable angina, uncontriolled hypertension, recent MI)
- Severe hearing or visual impairment
- No smoking and daibetic history
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group A: Clinical Based Rehabilitation
Participants in Group A will receive clinical-based rehabilitation through in-person physiotherapy sessions in an outpatient setting.
Treatment will be delivered three times per week for 6 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 30-40 minutes.
All interventions will be provided under the direct supervision of a qualified physiotherapist, ensuring proper monitoring, guidance, and correction of patient performance during therapy sessions.
Participants will also receive standardized instructions for home-based continuation of care on non-supervised days to support consistency of rehabilitation.
The focus of this arm is to evaluate the effectiveness of traditional face-to-face physiotherapy care in improving pain, functional disability, and exercise-related outcomes in patients with Grade-II cervical spondylosis.
|
The first intervention is clinical-based rehabilitation, delivered through in-person physiotherapy sessions in an outpatient clinical setting.
Participants will receive supervised treatment three times per week for 6 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 30-40 minutes.
All sessions will be conducted by a qualified physiotherapist who will provide direct monitoring, guidance, and correction to ensure proper execution of therapy.
This conventional rehabilitation approach emphasizes face-to-face interaction, allowing individualized attention and real-time clinical decision-making.
Participants will also be advised to continue prescribed home-based activities on non-session days to maintain consistency and support recovery outcomes.
|
|
Comparador Ativo: Group B: Synchronized Telerehabilitation
Participants in Group B will receive synchronized telerehabilitation delivered through real-time video conferencing.
Sessions will be conducted three times per week for 6 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 30-40 minutes.
Rehabilitation will be supervised live by a qualified physiotherapist who will provide instruction, monitoring, and feedback during each session to ensure correct performance and safety.
This remote delivery model will replicate the structure of clinical-based rehabilitation while eliminating the need for in-person visits.
Participants will also be given standardized guidance for continuing home-based activities on non-session days.
This arm aims to evaluate the effectiveness of synchronized telehealth-based physiotherapy in improving pain, functional disability, and exercise adherence in patients with Grade-II cervical spondylosis.
|
The second intervention is synchronized telerehabilitation, delivered through real-time video conferencing sessions.
Participants will receive supervised physiotherapy remotely three times per week for 6 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 30-40 minutes.
A qualified physiotherapist will provide live instruction, monitoring, and feedback to ensure correct performance and safety during exercises.
This approach replicates the structure of clinical-based rehabilitation while eliminating the need for in-person visits.
Participants will also be given standardized home-based activity instructions for non-session days to maintain continuity of care.
The intervention aims to evaluate the effectiveness of remote, technology-based rehabilitation in improving clinical outcomes in patients with Grade-II cervical spondylosis.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Intensity
Prazo: Measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and after 6 weeks (post-intervention completion).
|
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Participants will rate their average neck pain over the past 24 hours.
The NPRS is a valid and reliable tool widely used in musculoskeletal conditions, including cervical spondylosis, to measure changes in pain severity.
|
Measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and after 6 weeks (post-intervention completion).
|
|
Functional Disability
Prazo: Measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 6 weeks post-intervention completion.
|
Functional disability will be assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), a validated questionnaire designed to measure the impact of neck pain on daily activities.
It includes domains such as pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, work, concentration, sleep, and recreation.
Each item is scored, with higher total scores indicating greater disability.
The NDI is widely used in cervical spine disorders due to its strong reliability, validity, and sensitivity to clinical change.
|
Measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 6 weeks post-intervention completion.
|
|
Exercise Adherence
Prazo: Measured at baseline and at 6 weeks post-intervention completion.
|
Exercise adherence will be assessed using the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS), a validated self-reported questionnaire designed to measure the extent to which patients comply with prescribed home exercise programs.
It evaluates behaviors such as frequency of exercise performance, consistency in following instructions, and patient commitment to rehabilitation.
The scale provides insight into adherence patterns that directly influence treatment effectiveness in musculoskeletal conditions.
Higher scores indicate better adherence to the prescribed exercise regimen.
The EARS is widely used in rehabilitation research due to its good reliability and internal consistency.
|
Measured at baseline and at 6 weeks post-intervention completion.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Estimado)
1 de julho de 2026
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
1 de outubro de 2026
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
30 de novembro de 2026
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
25 de junho de 2026
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
25 de junho de 2026
Primeira postagem (Real)
1 de julho de 2026
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
1 de julho de 2026
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
25 de junho de 2026
Última verificação
1 de maio de 2026
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- UBAS/ERB/26/04/034
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
SIM
Descrição do plano IPD
baseline participants
Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
- SEIVA
- CIF
- CSR
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .