- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT07688707
Acute Effects of Cervical Manual Therapy on Eye Blood Flow (CERVICAL-OCTA)
Acute Effects of Cervical Manual Therapy on Retinal and Choroidal Perfusion Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Prospective Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Background and Rationale
Cervical musculoskeletal disorders, including mechanical neck pain and cervicogenic headache, affect an estimated 30-50% of the general population. Manual therapy encompassing spinal manipulation and mobilization techniques targeting the cervical spine has demonstrated efficacy in reducing pain intensity and improving functional outcomes. However, beyond its established biomechanical and neurophysiological effects, growing interest has emerged in elucidating the potential vascular and autonomic consequences of cervical manual therapy, particularly with respect to ocular circulation.
The eye is uniquely positioned as a window into systemic and regional vascular status. The retinal and choroidal vasculature are regulated by a complex interplay of local autoregulatory mechanisms, systemic blood pressure, intraocular pressure, and autonomic nervous system tone. The cervical sympathetic chain, lying in close anatomical proximity to the cervical vertebrae and the carotid artery, provides preganglionic and postganglionic sympathetic innervation to the ocular structures. Mechanical stimulation of the cervical spine may therefore modulate ocular perfusion through sympathetic pathways, alterations in vertebral artery blood flow, or changes in intracranial pressure dynamics.
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) has emerged as a non-invasive, high-resolution imaging modality capable of quantifying retinal and choroidal microvasculature with unprecedented detail. Quantitative metrics derived from OCTA, including vessel density, foveal avascular zone area, and choroidal thickness, provide sensitive and reproducible indices of microvascular status.
To date, the effects of cervical manual therapy on ocular circulation have been investigated only sporadically and with methodological limitations, including small sample sizes, absence of bilateral assessment, lack of temporal resolution, and absence of sham or no-treatment control arms. No prior study has employed OCTA to comprehensively evaluate the acute, time-resolved effects of cervical manual therapy across multiple retinal and choroidal vascular compartments in both eyes simultaneously using a sham-controlled design.
Objectives
The primary objective is to evaluate the acute effects of a single session of cervical manual therapy on retinal and choroidal microvascular perfusion as measured by OCTA in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain.
The secondary objectives are:
To assess changes in parafoveal vessel density
To assess changes in radial peripapillary capillary density
To assess changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness
To assess changes in foveal avascular zone parameters
To assess changes in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness
To assess changes in ganglion cell complex thickness
To assess changes in macular thickness
To evaluate the temporal profile of vascular responses (at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-intervention)
To compare vascular responses between active manual therapy and sham treatment
Hypothesis
Cervical manual therapy will produce a significantly greater augmentation of retinal and choroidal perfusion compared with sham treatment, with peak between-group differences at 60 minutes post-intervention, followed by convergence toward baseline by 120 minutes.
Study Design
This is a prospective, single-center, parallel-group randomized sham-controlled trial. Participants are randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either cervical high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation combined with Maitland mobilization (manual therapy group) or sham treatment. Bilateral OCTA examinations are performed at baseline and at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after intervention.
Setting
The study is conducted at SBU Van Training and Research Hospital, Van, Turkey.
Participant Timeline
Screening and enrollment: February 2026
Intervention and follow-up: Single session with 120-minute post-intervention observation
Final data collection: May 2026
Sample Size
Based on published OCTA test-retest data (intraday coefficient of variation ~2.5% for SCP whole-image density; within-subject standard deviation ~1.2 percentage points), a minimum detectable between-group difference of ≥2 percentage points, α=0.05 (two-tailed), and 1-β=0.80, a minimum of 42 participants per group is required. The enrolled sample of 50 per group provides ≥85% power and accommodates an estimated 15% dropout rate.
Interventions
Manual therapy group: A single, standardized session consisting of cervical HVLA thrust manipulation targeting C1-C2 and C3-C4 bilaterally, supplemented by sustained Maitland grade III-IV mobilization of the mid-cervical spine. Total session duration: 15-20 minutes. Audible cavitation is documented as a quality indicator.
Sham control group: Light, non-therapeutic manual contact at the same anatomical sites without joint movement, traction, or thrust (<5 N contact force). Session duration identical to active intervention.
Both groups remain seated throughout the observation window to control for postural effects on choroidal thickness.
Outcome Measures
Primary outcome: "Primary outcome was right-eye SCP whole-image density
Secondary outcomes:
whole-image and parafoveal vessel density Radial peripapillary capillary optic disc density Subfoveal choroidal thickness (μm) Foveal avascular zone area, perimeter, and circularity Retinal nerve fiber layer global thickness Ganglion cell complex thickness Macular center thickness Signal strength index Data Collection OCTA imaging is performed with a spectral-domain OCT device (Optovue Solix, Visionix / Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) at T0, T15, T30, T60, and T120 minutes post-intervention by the same blinded technician. Protocols include 6×6 mm foveal-centered and 4.5×4.5 mm optic disc-centered scans. Only images with SSI ≥6 are included.
To mitigate repeated-scan artifacts, the same automated segmentation algorithm is applied uniformly across all time points, and all segmentations are manually verified by a masked grader. Participants undergo a 2-minute dark adaptation prior to each scan, and the built-in eye-tracking system is activated. Scan registration across time points is performed using the device's automated follow-up mode.
Statistical Analysis Statistical analyses use Python 3.11 (SciPy 1.11, pandas 2.1, pingouin 0.5.4, statsmodels 0.14). Normality is assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Within-group temporal changes are analyzed using the Friedman test; post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction are applied. Between-group differences are analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with random intercept for subject and random slope for time, including fixed effects for group, time, and group×time interaction. Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction is applied across all secondary outcomes.
Analysis is performed on both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) basis.
Adverse Event Monitoring All participants are monitored for adverse events throughout the study period (from randomization through 24 hours post-intervention). Participants are asked at T15, T30, T60, T120, and via telephone at 24 hours about the occurrence of: neck pain worsening, dizziness, headache, nausea, visual symptoms (blurred vision, floaters, photopsia), or any other unusual symptom. All events are recorded and graded for severity and relationship to intervention.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Van, Turquia (Türkiye), 65000
- SBU Van Training and Research Hospital
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-70 years
- Chronic mechanical neck pain lasting ≥3 months according to IASP criteria
- Baseline VAS pain score ≥3
- Absence of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
- Ability to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures
- Adequate ocular image quality for OCTA assessment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous cervical spine surgery or major cervical trauma
- Vertebrobasilar insufficiency or other contraindications to cervical manual therapy
- Active inflammatory rheumatic disease or systemic connective tissue disorder
- Known retinal or optic nerve disease that may affect OCTA measurements (glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, optic neuritis, etc.)
- Diabetes mellitus with end-organ complications or uncontrolled systemic hypertension (>160/100 mmHg)
- Refractive error > ±6.0 D spherical equivalent or astigmatism >3.0 D
- Intraocular pressure >21 mmHg
- Previous ocular surgery, ocular trauma, or retinal laser treatment
- Media opacity preventing adequate OCTA image acquisition
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Participation in another interventional clinical study within the previous 30 days
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Triplo
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Manual Therapy Group
Participants receive a single session of cervical high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust manipulation targeting C1-C2 and C3-C4 bilaterally, supplemented by sustained Maitland grade III-IV mobilization of the mid-cervical spine.
Total session duration: 15-20 minutes.
|
A single, standardized session consisting of cervical high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust manipulation targeting C1-C2 and C3-C4 bilaterally, supplemented by sustained Maitland grade III-IV mobilization of the mid-cervical spine.
Total session duration: 15-20 minutes.
Audible cavitation is documented as a quality indicator.
Participants remain seated throughout the post-intervention observation period.
|
|
Comparador Falso: Sham Control Group
Participants receive light, non-therapeutic manual contact at the same anatomical sites without joint movement, traction, or thrust (<5 N contact force).
Session duration is identical to the active intervention.
|
Light, non-therapeutic manual contact at the same anatomical sites as the active intervention, without joint movement, traction, or thrust (<5 N contact force, verified by force gauge during training).
Session duration is identical to the active intervention (15-20 minutes).
Participants remain seated throughout the observation window to control for postural effects on choroidal thickness.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Superficial Capillary Plexus (SCP) Whole-Image Vessel Density
Prazo: Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120 min
|
Change in SCP whole-image density measured by OCTA at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-intervention compared to baseline.
|
Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120 min
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Deep Capillary Plexus (DCP) Parafoveal Vessel Density
Prazo: Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120 min
|
Change in DCP parafoveal vessel density measured by OCTA at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-intervention compared to baseline.
|
Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120 min
|
|
Change deep capillary plexus (DCP) whole-image Vessel Density
Prazo: Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120 min
|
Change in DCP whole-image and parafoveal vessel density measured by OCTA at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-intervention compared to baseline.
|
Baseline, 15, 30, 60, 120 min
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Evcimen Y, Başkan B, Öztürk S. Acute Effects of Cervical Manual Therapy on Retinal and Choroidal Perfusion Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Prospective Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial. [Manuscript]. SBU Van Training and Research Hospital, Van, Turkey; 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.20788573.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- GOKAEK/2026-02-20
- SBU Van Training and Research (Número de outro subsídio/financiamento: No external funding)
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD
Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD
Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
- SEIVA
- CIF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .