Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

FES: Effect on Walking in the Real World and Participation in Daily Life in People With Multiple Sclerosis. (FES in MS)

11 de setembro de 2026 atualizado por: University of California, San Francisco

Functional Electrical Stimulation: Effect on Walking in the Real World and Participation in Daily Life in People With Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, neurodegenerative disease and the most common cause of non- traumatic disability in young adults. Foot drop, arising from MS-induced muscle weakness, leads to impaired mobility, increased fall risk, reduced overall physical activity and reduced health-related quality of life. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) represents a revolutionary approach for addressing gait mobility challenges in MS and evolution in the technology has greatly improved its design, comfort, and functionality. Despite its proven benefits, FES is underutilized in MS clinical practice and lacks a comprehensive assessment of its long-term effectiveness and impact in real-world applications. Study objectives are to evaluate the utility of FES for improving function and real-world outcomes in people with MS (PwMS) who have gait impairments. Study design: 4-month randomized controlled trial (RCT) (n=70 PwMS) evaluating FES efficacy. Group 1: 4M FES; Group 2: 4M sham stimulation, followed by both groups: 4M FES, then 1M (no-FES) follow-up assessing carryover. We will assess gait quality, muscle function, physical activity, and FES adoption factors, with covariates including age, sex, MS severity, MS symptoms, biomechanical factors, and device usage patterns.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

OVERARCHING PLAN. To evaluate the utility of FES for improving function and real-world outcomes in PwMS with gait impairments. Study design: a 4-month (4M) parallel 1:1 RCT in 70 PwMS. Epoch A: Group 1, 4M of FES. Group 2, 4M of sham stimulation. Epoch B; Groups 1 and 2, 4M of FES - followed by 1-month no-FES follow-up to evaluate carryover. Outcomes: We will examine gait quality, muscle function, physical activity, and factors influencing long-term FES adoption. Covariates: age, sex, clinical (MS severity, symptoms) and biomechanical (i.e. orthotic effects) factors, and wear time /stimulation levels. Interprofessional team: expertise in biomechanics, remote monitoring of PwMS, clinical trials, biostatistics and implementation science.

STUDY DESIGN. This study is a 4-month parallel 1:1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 70 PwMS, designed to evaluate the impact of FES on mobility and long-term adoption. Participants will be randomized into two groups. Group 1: will receive FES during EPOCH A (4 months) and EPOCH B (4 months). Group 2 (delayed start): will receive 4 months of Sham stimulation during EPOCH A, and FES during EPOCH B. Follow-up: After Epoch B, all participants will be followed for 1 month with no FES sleeve or stimulation to assess carryover. Randomization. Participants will be stratified and randomized via a computer-generated sequence, with allocation concealed by an independent researcher. Blinding. Study coordinators and assessors will be blinded to group assignment to minimize bias. Setting. The UCSF Center for MS and Neuroinflammation provides state-of-the-art care to over 6,000 adults with MS annually. We have extensive experience with research studies enrolling patients including pivotal trials for MS,66 67 gathering patient generated data (PGD; i.e., remote physical activity)68, 69 and deploying digital technologies for health70 (see Facilities). Recruitment. Our goal is to enroll 70 adults (for 58 approximately 35 in each group, conservatively allowing for up to 20% attrition) with relapsing or progressive MS71 and some previously identified gait impairment who meet full inclusion/exclusion criteria. The study coordinator will pre-screen potential participants for disability level (EDSS) in the electronic health record (EHR).72 Some enrollment criteria require in-person assessment. Within each Group: We will include between 2:1 and 3:1 women to men, since MS affects 2-3 times more women than men. We will cap enrollment of non-Hispanic White patients at 65% to ensure that our participants reflect composition of our diverse clinic population (30-35% of whom identify as Black, Hispanic, Asian, or "Other") and that our data are generalizable to the experience of diverse PwMS. Patients will be contacted by IRB-approved means (telephone or email) or during a regular clinic visit (by the study team). Informed Consent. The study coordinator will obtain informed consent from eligible patients as detailed in the Human Subject's form prior to enrollment. Enrollment and screening. An eHEALS survey will assess participants' ability to use electronic health information. Patients who have given written informed consent will be formally enrolled into the study. We will block enroll (approximately 9 per disability group) across the EDSS disability spectrum based on preliminary data40, 43, 44, 49, 53, 54, 57: "mild - mild gait" (2.0-4.0), "moderate gait" (4.5-5.5), "unilateral support-" (6.0), and "bilateral support-" (6.5) for gait. This stratification enables evaluation of FES effects across diverse disability levels.

STUDY PROCEDURES. Overview. Participants will complete baseline assessments over 2-3 visits (within 1-2 weeks) to minimize fatigue, a common MS symptom. Baseline (Pre-Epoch A). They will undergo an in-clinic visit aligned with routine neurological care, including a detailed neurological exam and patient-reported outcomes (PROs, Table 2) available as paper or digital versions via REDCap74. Demographic/socioeconomic data will be obtained from the EHR. Based on inclusion criteria, participants will receive a standard-of-care referral to a neuro-PT. Participants will receive a Fitbit (Inspire 3 or newer), for continuous activity monitoring, with training and setup using anonymous credentials. One week of baseline activity data will be collected at home before initiating Epoch A (Group 1: FES, Group 2: Sham). At 4M (end of Epoch A) & 8M (end of Epoch B). Standardized assessments will include walking endurance, mobility, speed, fall risk (monthly surveys), balance, and participation-based measures (all detailed in Table 2), recommended by the MS Evidence Database to Guide Effectiveness task force for both clinical and research use.75 A trained PT will be present for all tests (for safety). Participants will rate effort (Rate of Perceived Exertion, scale: 0-10) and fatigue (0-10 scale) pre/post walking tests; if effort exceeds 4-5 or increases by ≥20%, they may rest longer or return another day. 1M Follow-up. Outcomes will be repeated per Table 2. A validated electronic patient-reported EDSS (ePR-EDSS76) will be collected to confirm no unexpected disability progression, which is not anticipated in this timeframe.

Intervention: Functional electrical stimulation via neural sleeve. The Cionic Neural Sleeve ("FES") is an FDA-cleared Class 2 medical device designed to aid mobility by stimulating leg muscles through metal electrodes embedded in a Nylon/Lycra garment (Fig 2).42 The interior of the sleeve has small metal electrodes which are covered by reusable 1.75"x1.75" gel sensor pads that adhere to the skin's surface. The electrodes connect to a handheld Control Unit, which powers the device and can be controlled via a smartphone application using Bluetooth Low Energy. The sleeve features gel sensor pads for skin contact and Velcro flaps for secure placement. Originally approved on February 14, 2022 [K213622], its compatibility was extended to include Android systems on July 21, 2022 [K221823]. Please see Preliminary Data (PD) below. Each participant will receive a neural sleeve and be asked to use it on their weaker limb (Group 1: 8M FES; Group 2: 4M Sham then 4M FES). Following manufacturer and FDA approved guidelines, a Cionic team member will fit the participant's affected leg with the appropriate Cionic sleeve size (XS - L). In a seated position, test stimulation is applied to muscle groups (dorsiflexors, plantarflexors, knee extensors/ flexors).

FES SETTINGS: FES Stimulation. Using a tailored electrode settings at an initial frequency of 35Hz and pulse width of 300µs, which has been shown in Cionic prior work (unpublished) to activate a visible motor contraction of the dorsiflexors. Stimulation intensity will start at 0mA, increasing in 10mA increments (range: 25-30mA) based on participant feedback (comfort/effectiveness) and gait effects. Sham Stimulation. Our own pilot data (Cionic; 12 PwMS) as well as literature propose a high-frequency (50-100 Hz), low-intensity (paresthesia, not painful), small pulse width (50-200μs) for stimulation that can be felt, but does not promote motor muscle contractions for sham stimulation/control,.77, 78

Cionic setup protocol details: Placement. Using the Neural Sleeve, electrodes will be positioned over four key gait muscles (see Figure 2): (1) quadriceps (vastus lateralis and rectus femoris at mid-thigh) for knee extension; (2) tibialis anterior (proximal third of the anterior-lateral tibia) for dorsiflexion; (3) gastrocnemius (medial/lateral heads at the proximal calf) for plantarflexion; and (4) hamstrings (biceps femoris along the posterior thigh) for knee flexion. Stimulation: the intensity of stimulation (mA) per day will be recorded and saved in the FES dashboard for each participant (initial group levels described above). The stimulation level per week will be used as a covariate in the analysis. Progression of FES: Figure 3 describes how FES will be progressed over the study. Minute-by-minute wear time will be recorded by the device and stored for analysis. Muscle selection: inclusion criteria require some lower extremity weakness (e.g. tibialis anterior, leading to foot drop). Activation of other muscle groups will be based on individual muscle weakness (<5/5 on manual muscle testing by the study PT) and recorded. The Cionic team will follow up with the participant (as per manufacturer guidelines) for virtual training, safety questions and all technical support throughout the study (see patient LOS). Risk mitigation for Cionic (set up and use): the study PT and Cionic team will assess participants' gait to note any visible impairments and ensure it is appropriate for device use. Individuals may use their assistive device (i.e. cane, walker) if applicable, assessing need to begin with AFO or other orthosis with sleeve for stability. The stimulation will never be raised to the point of discomfort or pain.

Details on Gait Metrics. Instrumented Walkway. Instrumented walkways (IWW) offer precise measurements of temporal-spatial parameters (i.e., gait speed, step length, support times, and base of support), which have been used to identify underlying causes of gait dysfunction in MS, as well as guiding treatment.96-98 A 16-foot ZenoTM IWW is permanently housed within our MS Clinic for clinical and research use (Bove), enrolling participants with variable neurological conditions, gait impairments and risk of falls. This reliable pressure IWW has been recognized (by the FDA) as the ground truth for gait measurements.99 Gait metrics. The ProtoKinetics software [PKMAS, LLC, Havertown, PA, USA) exports 679 gait variables from the IWW. From prior literature and our experience,99, 100 core variables capturing changes in gait in PwMS are: velocity (cm./sec - mean), cadence (steps/min - mean), step length (magnitude [increase] and symmetry - L/R ratio OR ASI [asymmetry index, aiming for =1]), variability (single support %, stride width: aiming for lower values). We will also include: total double support %, single support %, stride velocity, mean gait variability index, walk ratio, stride time, stride length. At baseline, 4M, 8M and follow/up: guided, and guarded by a study PT(safety), participants will walk over IWW at comfortable and fast gait speeds (2-4 passes per protocol)99 using their usual assistive device (cane, walker). Rationale for Timepoints: PwMS with disability will likely demonstrate slowing (~1-2s) of gait over time, the timepoints will account for natural progression. Ample rest breaks will be given between protocols.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

70

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, Estados Unidos, 94158
        • University of California San Francisco, Weill Institute for Neurosciences

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion criteria:

  • Diagnosis of MS (relapsing or progressive) by 2017 McDonald Criteria79
  • Ages 22-75 years old
  • EDSS 2 - 6.5 (wide range of impairment, 6.5 = ambulation requires walker or 2 canes)
  • ≥ 1/5 (and <5/5 on manual muscle test) of affected leg muscles
  • Any MS therapy, or no disease modifying treatment.
  • Technological criteria: availability of Wi-Fi in the home or workspace for connectivity.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Cognitive, dexterity or visual impairment that, in the opinion of the study neurologist (RB), would put the participant at risk or limit their ability to comply with the study protocol.
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • FES use in the last 6 months
  • Musculoskeletal / cardiovascular comorbidities that in the opinion of the study physical therapists (VB, JB), places the patient at risk.
  • Recent (last 30 days) relapse affecting gait
  • >2/4 on the Ashworth scale (3= passive movement difficult)

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Dobro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Falso: Group 2: FES Sham
This group will receive 4 months of sham stimulation followed by 4 months of functional electrical stimulation.
Participants will be randomized into two groups. Group 1: will receive FES during EPOCH A (4 months) and EPOCH B (4 months). Group 2 (delayed start): will receive 4 months of Sham stimulation during EPOCH A, and FES during EPOCH B. Follow-up: After Epoch B, all participants will be followed for 1 month with no FES sleeve or stimulation to assess carryover.
Comparador Ativo: Group 1: FES Full
This group will receive 8 months of functional electrical stimulation.
Participants will be randomized into two groups. Group 1: will receive FES during EPOCH A (4 months) and EPOCH B (4 months). Group 2 (delayed start): will receive 4 months of Sham stimulation during EPOCH A, and FES during EPOCH B. Follow-up: After Epoch B, all participants will be followed for 1 month with no FES sleeve or stimulation to assess carryover.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Adherence
Prazo: 4 months
Adherence will be measured by monitoring compliance with prescribed use (at least ½ of prescribed FES use = success).
4 months
Retention
Prazo: 4 months
Retention will be assessed by the proportion of participants in each group, who remain in the study till the end of Epoch A
4 months
Peak Step Rate
Prazo: 4 months
Peak step rate will be calculated per literature using minute-by-minute step count
4 months
PROMIS - Participation satisfaction
Prazo: 4 months
We will evaluate changes in participation from baseline to 4 months using Wilcoxon signed rank test.
4 months
Dorsiflexion angle
Prazo: baseline
Assess changes in ankle dorsiflexion angle from pre to post by a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test
baseline
Spatiotemporal gait metrics
Prazo: 4 months
A linear mixed model with random intercepts for participants will assess the relationship between muscle function changes (i.e., Manual muscle testing, sEMG activation) and unassisted (no FES) gait.To compare FES vs. Sham in Epoch A, we will use an LMM with fixed effects for group, time (baseline, 4M), and interaction, adjusting for covariates
4 months
Dynamometer muscle strength
Prazo: 4 months
To compare FES vs. Sham in Epoch A, we will use an linear mixed model with fixed effects for group, time (baseline, 4M), and interaction, adjusting for covariates
4 months

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Persistence (prolonged adherence to FES)
Prazo: 4 months
Prolonged adherence to FES will be tracked via the FES device database, with success defined as ≥60% of participants using FES an average of ≥3 days per week.
4 months
Adoption
Prazo: 4 months
Adoption: will be measured by calculating the % of patients who use the FES during the first month of the study (3-5 days per week in each of the 4 weeks = success).
4 months
Daily Step count
Prazo: 4 months
A linear mixed model will be used to evaluate change in STEPS from baseline to 6 months, by controlling for confounding factors such as attendance to neurological physical therapy, duration, intervention type, and response to specialized PT from the electronic health record.
4 months
Dorsiflexion angle change
Prazo: 8 months
We will explore additional changes at 8 months, and also assess the impact of compliance and adherence by adjusting for stimulation level and days of use (from Cionic dashboard) and see if the differences are improved for higher compliance.
8 months
Spatiotemporal gait metrics
Prazo: 8 months
We will apply a linear mixed models with repeated measures, including random intercepts for participants, to compare the changes in outcome measures while using FES in Group 1 (baseline to 4M to 8M) to the changes in Group 2, Epoch B (4m to 8M); to understand if individuals with 8M of FES have improved outcomes compared to those with 4M of FES. Hochberg's method will be used to control for multiple comparisons. 3°) Correlations between self-reported
8 months

Outras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Retention (prolonged)
Prazo: 8 months
retention will be assessed over 8M (Epoch A + B for Group 1), with additional comparisons between Group 2 (Epoch A/Sham, transitioning to Epoch B/FES) and Group 1 (Epoch A/FES).
8 months
Persistence
Prazo: 8 months
Persistence will be assessed over 8M (Epoch A + B for Group 1), with additional comparisons between Group 2 (Epoch A/Sham, transitioning to Epoch B/FES) and Group 1 (Epoch A/FES).
8 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Valerie Block, DPTSc, University of California, San Francisco

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

31 de agosto de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

2 de julho de 2029

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

30 de outubro de 2030

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

9 de julho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

9 de julho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

15 de julho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

15 de setembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

11 de setembro de 2026

Última verificação

1 de setembro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Sim

produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever