Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Large-Scale Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Tree for the Management of Low-Energy Thoracic and Lumbar Vertebral Compression Fractures. (PALMTREE)

16 de julho de 2026 atualizado por: University Hospital, Grenoble
Percutaneous vertebroplasty is widely used for low-energy vertebral compression fractures, but its clinical benefits remain debated. Studies and meta-analyses have reported mixed results, while complications occur in a significant proportion of patients, highlighting the importance of careful patient selection. To standardize management, a clinical decision tree was developed based on patient age, MRI findings, pain severity (VAS), and radiological deformity.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Ainda não está recrutando

Descrição detalhada

Percutaneous vertebroplasty was first described in France in 1987 . Since its introduction, this minimally invasive technique has become widely accepted and is now a routine treatment for low-energy vertebral compression fractures (LEVCFs), also referred to as vertebral "crush" fractures. Clinical outcomes, including pain relief, analgesic consumption, and quality of life assessed through self-administered questionnaires, are commonly used to evaluate the effectiveness of the procedure.

Over the past 20 years, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to assess the efficacy of vertebroplasty compared with non-surgical management (including bracing and placebo treatment). Two recent meta-analyses identified 13 RCTs published by January 2019 and 14 RCTs by July 2020, reaching different conclusions.

In 2019, Lou et al. concluded that percutaneous vertebroplasty was effective and safe only in patients with acute low-energy vertebral compression fractures associated with persistent and severe pain. In contrast, Lainez Ramos-Bossini et al. concluded in 2020 that vertebroplasty offered significant benefits compared with non-surgical treatment, including short-term pain relief and improved quality of life. However, these benefits appeared more limited when vertebroplasty was compared with placebo treatment.

The conclusion of the Cochrane review published by Buchbinder et al. in 2018 remains relevant today: "Based on high- to moderate-quality evidence, our updated review does not support a role for vertebroplasty in the routine management of acute or subacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures." .

Furthermore, recent studies involving large patient cohorts have reported a significant rate of complications associated with percutaneous vertebroplasty. Among 1,932 patients, 166 (8.6%) experienced a complication, including 53 minor complications (2.7%) and 95 major complications (4.9%) . Patient selection appears to play a crucial role in the occurrence of complications, as suggested by Scheyerer et al. in a recent literature review .

The authors identified both non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors for perioperative and postoperative complications, including: age >90 years, male sex, low level of daily activity, partial or complete dependency, hospitalization, high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), arterial hypertension, renal failure, liver failure, coagulopathies, chronic steroid use, preoperative sepsis, and hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL) .

Simple preoperative markers, such as serum albumin levels, should therefore be considered when deciding whether vertebroplasty is appropriate for the treatment of low-energy vertebral compression fractures.

To improve the clarity and standardization of the management of patients presenting with low-energy vertebral compression fractures ("crush" fractures), we developed a clinical decision tree based on patient age, MRI findings, pain severity assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the extent of radiological deformity.

THE AIME OF THE STUDY IS : To evaluate the clinical and radiological healing outcomes of patients managed according to a clinical decision tree for one or more low-energy vertebral compression fractures (LEVCFs) at Grenoble Alpes University Hospital between January 1, 2022, and March 31, 2025.

Design of the study :Single-center prospective observational cohort study with no control group.

Tipo de estudo

Observacional

Inscrição (Estimado)

400

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

      • La Tronche, França, 38700
        • GRENOBLE ALPES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
        • Investigador principal:
          • Mehdi BOUDISSA, Pr
        • Contato:
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Método de amostragem

Amostra de Probabilidade

População do estudo

In this study, all patients treated for one or more low-energy vertebral compression fractures (LEVCFs) in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology at Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, according to the clinical decision tree, between January 1, 2022, and March 31, 2025, will be eligible for inclusion.

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 50 years
  • One or more low-energy vertebral compression fractures (LEVCFs) confirmed by MRI
  • Fractures located between T7 and L5
  • Compression fractures classified as A1.1, A1.2, or A1.3 according to the Magerl classification [15]
  • Management in accordance with the clinical decision tree
  • Vertebroplasty performed by an interventional radiologist, orthopedic surgeon, or neurosurgeon
  • Vertebral augmentation performed by an orthopedic surgeon or neurosurgeon, with or without navigation assistance
  • Conservative treatment consisting of a lumbar brace worn during daytime, with duration individualized according to the patient's needs, and physiotherapy initiated between 45 and 90 days after treatment, including core stabilization, stretching, and strengthening of the posterior muscle chain and abdominal muscles, based on active rehabilitation rather than manual therapy (no massage therapy).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Individuals under administrative or judicial supervision
  • Age < 50 years or > 90 years
  • Pathological vertebral fracture
  • Presence of other osteoporotic fractures during the study follow-up period (6 months)
  • Non-compliance with the clinical decision tree
  • Dementia or cognitive impairment preventing data collection at the final follow-up (telephone interview), assessed using the Mini-Cog test (score < 3 = exclusion)
  • Refusal to participate during the telephone interview or inability to provide non-opposition (e.g., under legal guardianship)

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Evaluate the clinical and radiological healing outcomes of patients managed according to a clinical decision tree for one or more low-energy vertebral compression fractures (LEVCFs)
Prazo: 1 year
Radiological fracture healing, assessed on standard radiographs based on cortical continuity, disappearance of fracture lines, absence of progressive kyphosis, and absence of osteosynthesis hardware-related complications. Fracture healing will be classified as complete, partial, or absent.
1 year

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Assessment of radiological deformity.
Prazo: 1 year
Assessment of radiological deformity (vertebral kyphosis [VK], regional kyphosis [RK], and spinal canal narrowing) in patients managed according to the clinical decision tree
1 year
Assessment of clinical outcomes
Prazo: 1 year
EVA -pain score
1 year
Assessment of clinical outcomes
Prazo: 1 year
quality of life EQ5D 3 L
1 year
Assessment of clinical outcomes
Prazo: 1 year
Mobility -Parker Mobility Score
1 year
Assessment of clinical outcomes
Prazo: 1 year
Analysis of risk factors for failure of conservative treatment
1 year
Assessment of vertebroplasty cement filling quality
Prazo: 1 year
(Garnier classification)
1 year
Assessment of fracture healing and associated factors
Prazo: 1 year
Evaluation of time to fracture healing, comparing conservative versus surgical treatment (measured in days; for surgical treatment, time is calculated from the date of surgery)
1 year
Assessment of fracture healing and associated factors
Prazo: 1 year
Assessment of the effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on fracture healing and the rate of refracture or new fractures.
1 year
Assessment of fracture healing and associated factors
Prazo: 1 year
Assessment of the effect of osteoporosis treatment on fracture healing and the rate of refracture or new fractures.
1 year
Assessment of complications
Prazo: 1 year
Perioperative and postoperative complications, including cement leakage, secondary lumbar spinal canal stenosis, intravertebral cleft (Kümmell disease), adjacent vertebral fractures, and pseudarthrosis (nonunion).
1 year
Assessment of treatment timelines
Prazo: 1 year
ime intervals (in days) between fracture occurrence and MRI, between MRI and surgical consultation, and between fracture occurrence and definitive treatment.
1 year

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

15 de julho de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

15 de julho de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

15 de julho de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

10 de julho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

10 de julho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

15 de julho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

17 de julho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

16 de julho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de julho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 38RC26.0185

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever