- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT07713043
Effects of Autogenic Drainage and Flutter Device in COPD
17 de julho de 2026 atualizado por: Riphah International University
Comparative Effects of Autogenic Drainage and Flutter Device on Dyspnea, Pulmonary Function Test and Functional Capacity in COPD
COPD is a progressive lung disease that includes emphysema and chronic bronchitis and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide.
Airway clearance techniques help improve mucus removal, reduce dyspnea, and enhance quality of life in COPD patients.
This study aims to compare the effects of autogenic drainage and flutter device on dyspnea, pulmonary function, and functional capacity in patients with COPD.
A randomized clinical trial will be conducted at Gulab Devi Teaching Hospital using convenient sampling.
Participants will be divided into two groups: Group A will receive autogenic drainage, while Group B will use the flutter device.
Interventions will be performed daily for 20-30 minutes over 6 weeks.
Outcome measures will include dyspnea severity scale, spirometry, and 6-minute walk test.
Data will be analyzed using SPSS with significance set at p < 0.05.
The study may provide evidence for effective, non-invasive, and cost-effective management strategies for COPD patients.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Ainda não está recrutando
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is progressive damage to lungs with a combination of airway diseases that are emphysema and chronic bronchitis.
COPD is the major cause of chronic mortality and morbidity throughout the world.
It's third leading cause of death in the world.
Non pharmacological intervention Airway clearance techniques plays crucial role in managing COPD and enhancing patients quality of life by removal of bronchial secretions.
Two popular techniques autogenic drainage and flutter are based on the same principle of mobilization and removal of secretions.
These non-invasive techniques aimed at enhancing mucus clearance and reducing dyspnea.
The objective of the study's primary goal is to compare the effect of autogenic drainage and flutter device on the dyspnea, pulmonary function test and functional capacity in the patients with COPD.
The study design will be ramdomized clinical trial.
It will be conducted at Ghulab Devi |Teaching Hospital.
Sample size will be conducted through non- probability convenient sampling as per inclusion criteria.
Participants will be randomly added into two groups.
Group A will receive autogenic drainage intervention and the Group B will receive flutter device intervention.
Both interventions will be practiced daily for 5 days 6 weeks for 20-30 minutes.
Pre and post intervention data will be collected.
Outcome measures include dyspnea severity scale, spirometer and 6-minute walk test.
Data will be analyzed by using SPSS.
Data will be tested for normality distribution.
Paired or Independent t-test will be used to compare variables between the two groups and within the two groups, with significance set at p< 0.05.
This study will provide evidence for the integration of non-invasive, cost effective strategies for the enhancement of PFT's and functional capacity and dyspnea.
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Estimado)
42
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Muhammad Iqbal Tariq Tariq, Phd*
- Número de telefone: 333826752
- E-mail: iqbal.tariq@riphah.edu.pk
Estude backup de contato
- Nome: Nimra Noor Noor, MS-CPPT
- Número de telefone: 03030684869
- E-mail: nimranoor358@gmail.com
Locais de estudo
-
-
Punjab Province
-
Lahore, Punjab Province, Paquistão, 40100
- Nimra Noor
-
Contato:
- Nimra Noor Noor, MS-CPPT
- Número de telefone: 03030684869
- E-mail: nimranoor358@gmail.com
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age group: Middle age adults (40-60 years), medically stable
- Both gender
- Diagnosis based on GOLD criteria ((FEV₁/FVC ratio < 0.70).
- Moderate COPD with no acute exacerbations in the past 4-6 weeks.
- Participants must be able to perform Autogenic drainage and Flutter device physically and mentally.
- Voluntary participation with consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cardic Diseases (Acute MI, Congestive Heart Failure)
- Musculoskeletal Impairements
- Using Non-invasive Ventilation
- Recent lung diseases (Respiratory failure, pneumothorax)
- Hemodynamic instability
- Uncoorperative patients
- Cognitive Impairement scale
- Participants excluded if they did not consent
- Comorbidities affecting exercise tolerance
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Autogenic drainage
The participants in this group will be instructed to sit comfortably with the neck slightly extended and clear the upper airways by huffing or blowing the nose.
Autogenic drainage begins with slow diaphragmatic breathing at low lung volumes, followed by a 3-second pause and gentle high-velocity expiration with an open glottis.
As secretions move upward, breathing gradually shifts to medium and high lung volumes until mucus reaches the trachea for expectoration.
The cycle of breathing exercises is repeated for 15-20 minutes while suppressing unnecessary coughing.
|
The patient begins by performing the diaphragmatic breathing at low lung volume inspiration will slow with a pause of three seconds allowing the collateral ventilation, and expiration will done as a sigh with an open glottis and with high velocity as possible but no forced expiration.
During this low lung volume breathing, expiration will encourage to the expiratory reserve volume.
When the patient feel secretions to be moving, the volume of inspiration became deeper and expiration did not go down as far as expiratory reserve volume.
As the secretions moved up the bronchial tree to the large airways then the patient will ask to perform higher lung volume breathing, tidal volume to inspiratory reserve volume range.
This middle to high lung volume breathing continued until the secretions will in the trachea and ready to be expectorated
Outros nomes:
|
|
Experimental: Flutter Device (Positive expiratory pressure technique)
The participant in this group will be instructed to sit comfortably while leaning forward with elbows supported and the neck slightly extended to open the airway.
The flutter device is held horizontally with a slight upward tilt and placed in the mouth.
The patient inhales slowly through the nose, holds the breath for 3-5 seconds, and exhales through the flutter device slightly faster than normal.
After 4-8 breaths, a deep inhalation followed by forced expiration through the device helps mobilize secretions.
Breathing control is maintained, followed by coughing or huffing if needed.
The procedure is repeated for 10-15 minutes.
|
The flutter device will hold horizontally and tilted slightly upwards to get maximal oscillatory effect and then it was placed in the mouth.
Inspiration was done through the nose.
A slow breath in, only slightly deeper than normal with a breath hold of 3-5 seconds will followed by breath out through the flutter device at a slightly faster rate than normal.
After 4-8 breaths, a deep breath with a hold' at full inspiration will followed by a force expiration through the flutter device.
This precipitated expectoration and will followed by a pause for breathing control, and then according to the subjects' preference a cough or huff was done
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Dyspnea
Prazo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
|
The modified medical research council; (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale is a simple and widely used scale
|
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
|
|
Forced Vital Capacity
Prazo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
|
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) will be measured in liters (L) using spirometry.
FVC represents the maximum volume of air that can be forcefully exhaled after a maximal inspiration.
|
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
|
|
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second
Prazo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
|
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV₁) will be measured in liters (L) using spirometry.
FEV₁ represents the volume of air exhaled during the first second of a forced expiratory maneuver.
|
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
|
|
FEV₁/FVC ratio
Prazo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
|
The FEV₁/FVC ratio will be expressed as a percentage (%) and calculated from spirometric measurements to assess the degree of airflow limitation.
|
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
|
|
Peak Expiratory Flow
Prazo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
|
Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) will be measured in liters per minute (L/min) and represents the maximum expiratory flow achieved during forced expiration.
|
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Arjumand Bano, MS, Riphah International University
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Estimado)
1 de junho de 2026
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
1 de agosto de 2026
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
1 de agosto de 2026
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
8 de junho de 2026
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
17 de julho de 2026
Primeira postagem (Real)
20 de julho de 2026
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
20 de julho de 2026
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
17 de julho de 2026
Última verificação
1 de julho de 2026
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- REC/RCR & AHS/25/0309
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
NÃO
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .