Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Effect of Surface EMG Biofeedback on Quadriceps Inhibition Release During Postoperative Knee Rehabilitation (BIOQUAD)

17 de agosto de 2026 atualizado por: Hopitaux de Saint-Maurice

Effet du Biofeedback Par EMG de Surface Sur la levée d'Inhibition du Quadriceps en rééducation Post-opératoire du Genou

Arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) is a common neurological impairment following knee surgery that limits voluntary quadriceps activation and delays functional recovery. Persistent AMI may contribute to muscle weakness, altered gait, and poorer rehabilitation outcomes. Although several rehabilitation strategies have been proposed, no complementary intervention has consistently demonstrated strong evidence for improving AMI.

This prospective single-case experimental study aims to evaluate whether visual biofeedback based on surface electromyography (sEMG) improves quadriceps motor performance during standard rehabilitation. Each participant will complete eight standardized rehabilitation sessions, including four sessions with visual sEMG biofeedback and four sessions without visual feedback. The order of the two conditions will be randomized, allowing each participant to serve as his or her own control.

The primary objective is to determine whether visual sEMG biofeedback improves the accuracy of quadriceps contraction, assessed by the percentage deviation from a predefined target. Secondary objectives include evaluation of motor engagement, motor control, muscle activation, perceived exertion, and pain.

Between three and five adult patients presenting AMI after knee surgery will be included. Because recovery patterns are highly individualized, a Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) with repeated within-subject measurements has been selected to characterize individual treatment responses while minimizing inter-individual variability

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) is a reflexive neurological response commonly observed after knee surgery. It results from altered afferent input originating from the injured joint, leading to reduced voluntary activation of the quadriceps muscle. AMI contributes to muscle weakness, impaired knee extension, gait abnormalities, and delayed functional recovery. Persistent inhibition may negatively affect long-term rehabilitation outcomes.

Surface electromyography (sEMG) biofeedback provides real-time visual information about muscle activation, enabling patients to voluntarily adjust their contractions during rehabilitation exercises. Previous studies suggest that EMG biofeedback may improve neuromuscular activation and motor learning, although evidence remains limited.

The BIOQUAD study is a prospective, within-subject Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) conducted in adult patients undergoing rehabilitation after knee surgery who present AMI. This design was selected because of the high inter-individual variability in neuromuscular recovery and the exploratory nature of the study. Each participant acts as his or her own control through repeated measurements under two experimental conditions.

Each participant will complete eight standardized rehabilitation sessions over approximately three weeks:

  • Four sessions with visual sEMG biofeedback.
  • Four sessions without visual feedback while EMG signals are still recorded.
  • The order of conditions will be randomized using a predefined balanced sequence to reduce learning and order effects.

At the beginning of each session, maximal quadriceps activation (EMGmax) will be calibrated using three maximal voluntary contractions. Participants will then perform six standardized contractions targeting 80% of EMGmax, each maintained for five seconds and separated by fifteen seconds of rest.

The primary endpoint is contraction accuracy, defined as the percentage deviation from the target muscle activation level. Secondary outcomes include:

time spent within the target activation zone (±5%);

  • motor latency;
  • maximal EMG activity (EMGmax);
  • motor engagement score;
  • perceived exertion (Borg scale);
  • pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale). Data will be analyzed using SCED methodology with visual and descriptive analyses focusing on level, trend, variability, and overlap between experimental conditions. Results will primarily be interpreted at the individual participant level before descriptive synthesis across participants.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

5

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

      • Saint-Maurice, França, 94410
        • Hôpitaux Paris Est Val-de-Marne - Service de rééducation orthopédique et traumatologie
        • Contato:
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • AMI following knee surgery, as classified by the Santi classification system
  • Aged 18 or older
  • Enrolled in or covered by a social security program
  • Able to understand instructions and participate in standardized rehabilitation sessions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute pain.
  • Neurological condition.
  • Skin lesion at the electrode site.
  • Allergy to the electrode.
  • Under legal protective measures such as guardianship or court-ordered protection

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição cruzada
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Visual sEMG Biofeedback
Participants perform standardized rehabilitation exercises with real-time visual surface electromyography biofeedback.
Participants perform standardized rehabilitation exercises while receiving real-time visual feedback of quadriceps muscle activity using surface electromyography (sEMG)
Comparador Ativo: No Visual Biofeedback
Participants perform the same standardized rehabilitation exercises without visual biofeedback. Surface EMG signals are recorded but not displayed to the participant.
Participants perform the same standardized rehabilitation exercises without visual biofeedback. Surface electromyography signals are recorded but are not displayed to the participant.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Percentage Deviation From the Target Quadriceps Activation Level
Prazo: During each of the 8 rehabilitation sessions, over approximately 3 weeks
The percentage deviation between the quadriceps muscle activation achieved by the participant and the predefined target activation level of 80% of the maximal surface electromyography activity (EMGmax). The measure will be calculated for each contraction performed during sessions with visual sEMG biofeedback and sessions without visual biofeedback. The percentage deviation between the participant's quadriceps muscle activation and the predefined target activation level (80% of EMGmax). Lower values indicate greater contraction accuracy.
During each of the 8 rehabilitation sessions, over approximately 3 weeks

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Time Spent Within the Target Quadriceps Activation Zone
Prazo: During each of the 8 rehabilitation sessions, over approximately 3 weeks
Duration, expressed in seconds, during which quadriceps muscle activation remains within ±5% of the predefined target level of 80% of EMGmax during each contraction. A longer time within the target zone indicates better motor control.
During each of the 8 rehabilitation sessions, over approximately 3 weeks
Quadriceps Motor Latency
Prazo: During each of the 8 rehabilitation sessions, over approximately 3 weeks
Time, expressed in seconds, between the instruction to initiate the contraction and the onset of the quadriceps muscle activation recorded by surface electromyography. A shorter latency indicates a faster motor response.
During each of the 8 rehabilitation sessions, over approximately 3 weeks
Maximal Quadriceps Surface Electromyography Activity
Prazo: At the beginning of each of the 8 rehabilitation sessions, over approximately 3 weeks
Maximum quadriceps muscle activation recorded by surface electromyography during the calibration procedure performed at the beginning of each session. EMGmax is determined from three maximal voluntary contractions lasting 5 seconds each
At the beginning of each of the 8 rehabilitation sessions, over approximately 3 weeks
Pain Intensity Assessed Using a Numeric Rating Scale
Prazo: At the end of each of the 8 rehabilitation sessions, over approximately 3 weeks
Participant-reported pain intensity assessed at the end of each rehabilitation session using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
At the end of each of the 8 rehabilitation sessions, over approximately 3 weeks
Perceived Exertion Assessed Using the Borg Scale
Prazo: At the end of each of the 8 rehabilitation sessions, over approximately 3 weeks
Participant-reported perceived exertion assessed at the end of each rehabilitation session using the Borg CR10 Scale (range: 0-10). Higher scores indicate greater perceived exertion.
At the end of each of the 8 rehabilitation sessions, over approximately 3 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Sylvain SB BELOT, MD, Hôpitaux Paris Est Val-de-Marne (HPEVM)

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de agosto de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

30 de setembro de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

31 de dezembro de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

24 de julho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

24 de julho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

30 de julho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

19 de agosto de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

17 de agosto de 2026

Última verificação

1 de agosto de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Descrição do plano IPD

No plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever