Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Adapting the Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression Therapy to Reduce Intimate Partner Violence and Promote Psychosocial Recovery in Veteran Couples (MERA-C) (MERA-C)

31 de julho de 2026 atualizado por: VA Office of Research and Development
This study will address a pressing unmet need for effective and accessible treatment for Veteran couples with intimate partner violence (IPV). The primary objective is to adapt a brief intervention originally developed to reduce general aggression among individual Veterans with PTSD symptoms (Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression; MERA) to reduce IPV among Veteran couples. First, the investigators will conduct stakeholder interviews to inform the content, dose, and timing of the adapted MERA-Couples manual (MERA-C). Second, the investigators will examine the preliminary feasibility and acceptability of MERA-C through a single-arm feasibility trial among 10 Veteran couples with IPV. Finally, the investigators will conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (N= 60 couples) to examine the preliminary within- and between-couple effects of MERA-C versus MERA on (1) participant acceptability and retention and (2) physical and psychological IPV occurrence; emotion regulation; relationship functioning; and psychosocial functioning from pre- to post-treatment and at 1-month follow-up.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

SPECIFIC AIMS Intimate partner violence (IPV), which includes a wide spectrum of physical and non-physical behaviors, is a serious and prevalent public health problem that disproportionately affects the Veteran population. IPV is most commonly bidirectional, meaning that both partners in a couple use aggression towards one another at both the couple and the event levels. It is also characterized by lower severity, a high degree of frequency and severity symmetry between partners, and reactive rather than premeditated aggression. IPV directly impacts Veterans Health Administration (VHA) operations: Up to 49% of Veterans who used VHA health care in the past year reported using IPV and similar proportions report experiencing victimization. IPV is associated with myriad detrimental outcomes, including significant physical and mental health problems, housing instability, suicidality, and reduced quality of life and psychosocial functioning. Unsurprisingly, Veterans who experience IPV are more likely to subsequently utilize VHA services compared to those who do not.

While VHA has greatly improved reliable trauma-informed IPV victimization screening and referral practices there is substantial room to improve intervention options to reduce IPV use. Despite the widely varying nature of IPV experiences and treatment preferences among Veterans, only one IPV intervention program is currently available at select VHA facilities. Strength at Home consists of 12 x 1 hour group therapy sessions for individual Veterans, most of whom are men (81%) involved in the criminal justice system (62%). Just as more than one treatment option is available to Veterans for common presenting problems in the psychosocial health arena, a one-size-fits-all approach is insufficient to address the complex and inherently dyadic problem of IPV among Veterans4. A brief dyadic approach is safe, feasible, and acceptable for couples engaging in less severe and bidirectional forms of "situational" or "common" couple violence16 and consistent with Veterans' IPV-focused treatment preferences as compared to lengthier individual or group modalities.

The existing literature agrees that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a common mental health concern among Veterans seeking VHA services, exacerbates risk for IPV use. This salient link is commonly explained by social information processing theory, which suggests that individuals with PTSD incur heightened risk for IPV use as a result of hostile attribution bias, excessive perception of threat, chronic emotional and physiological hyperarousal, and impaired emotion regulation capabilities. Indeed, difficulty with emotion regulation, or the process through which people manage their emotional experiences and emotional expression, is common among Veterans, a central feature of PTSD, a known risk factor for IPV, and a promising IPV intervention target. Notably, recent empirical literature among couples has highlighted the role of emotional co-regulation in mediating both adaptive and maladaptive couple conflict behaviors including IPV.

The purpose of the proposed Stage 1a/1b study is to create a novel dyadic adaptation of the Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA) therapy protocol (i.e., MERA-Couples or MERA-C). In its current form, the MERA treatment is a brief trauma-informed cognitive behavioral modality designed to reduce impulsive general aggression among individual Veterans with PTSD symptoms. Findings from a published single arm clinical trial of MERA among male Veterans (N=27, CX001337, PI: Miles) indicated strong feasibility and acceptability and substantial reductions in aggression with medium-to-large effect sizes and medium effect sizes in emotion regulation improvement. Dr. Miles (MPI) is currently testing MERA's efficacy in a VA-sponsored two-site Stage II trial (N=204, CX002135). Retention in the treatment phase is 96% to date, with 76% of participants being partnered. Importantly, MERA was developed specifically for Veterans with PTSD symptoms within VHA and is presently available to any VA provider to administer with their patients. Thus, adapting MERA to address IPV among Veteran couples (MERA-C) is one promising pathway to better address the rehabilitation and recovery needs of Veteran couples experiencing IPV.

Specific Aim 1: Conduct semi-structured stakeholder interviews with Veteran couples (N= 10 couples) and VHA mental health treatment providers (N= 10 providers) to adapt the MERA manual into MERA-C.

Specific Aim 2: Conduct a single-arm pilot test of the MERA-C intervention among Veteran couples (N= 10 couples) to further refine the adapted treatment manual.

Specific Aim 3: Conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (N= 60 couples) to compare the effects of MERA-C to MERA on (a) participant acceptability and retention and (b) IPV occurrence; emotion regulation; relationship functioning; and psychosocial functioning from pre- to post-treatment and at 1-month follow-up.

This study is directly responsive to several VHA priorities. The investigators will translate a transdiagnostic mechanism of behavior change (i.e., emotion regulation) into urgently needed and more accessible clinical intervention for Veterans with IPV. This study addresses a high priority comorbidity of PTSD and IPV and does so among couples to create sustainable change. The MERA-C treatment manual will be immediately available to providers and the study team is ideally positioned to disseminate and implement MERA-C among Veterans in the long-term.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

120

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, Estados Unidos, 29401-5703
        • Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
        • Investigador principal:
          • Julianne Christina Flanagan, PhD
        • Contato:
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

Veteran and Partner Inclusion criteria

  1. At least one partner in each couple must be a U.S. military Veteran
  2. Married, cohabiting, or in a committed relationship for at least 6 months
  3. Cognitive functioning sufficient to provide informed consent and participate accurately (≥ 23 on the Mini-Mental Status Exam [MMSE])
  4. Veteran meets criteria for subthreshold PTSD or greater (Criterion A plus scoring 2 or higher on at least one symptom from each of clusters B, C, D, and E as measured by the PCL-5)
  5. At least 1 instance of mild or moderate physical intimate partner violence (IPV) in the current relationship in the past year (as defined by the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale [CTS-2])
  6. Not currently enrolled in couple therapy
  7. Participants taking psychotropic medications will be required to be maintained on a stable dose for at least four weeks before study initiation. This is because initiation or change of psychotropic medications during the course of the trial may interfere with interpretation of results

Exclusion Criteria:

Veteran and Partner Exclusion criteria

  1. Any severe physical or sexual IPV (as measured by the CTS-2) at any time in the current relationship
  2. Having a psychiatric condition requiring a higher level of care as assessed by the Quick Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders (QuickSCID), such as psychotic or bipolar disorders. Those participants will be referred clinically.
  3. Severe substance use disorder. Nicotine dependence is allowed. Participants requiring specialty care for substance use disorders or smoking cessation aid will be referred clinically.
  4. Current suicidal, self-harm behavior, or homicidal ideation and intent requiring a higher level of care or who are likely to require hospitalization during the study. Those participants will be referred clinically.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: MERA-C
Phase 3/Aim 3 of this study involves a behavioral intervention. Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression-Couples (MERA-C). Although the exact duration and timing of MERA-C will be established in Aim 1, the investigators anticipate that MERA-C will be the same duration as individual MERA: 4 weekly couples/dyadic therapy sessions of 45-60 minutes each.
4 weekly dyadic/couples therapy sessions of 45-60 minutes each.
Outros nomes:
  • MERA-C
Comparador Ativo: MERA
Manage Emotions to Reduce Aggression (MERA). 4 weekly individual therapy sessions of 45-60 minutes each.
4 weekly individual therapy sessions of 45-60 minutes each.
Outros nomes:
  • MERA

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Time Line Follow Back
Prazo: 2 months
The Time Line Follow-Back (TLFB) will be used as the primary IPV assessment given the need for a count variable to compare time points at varying intervals. The TLFB is a calendar-assisted, semi-structured interview assessing daily quantity and frequency of alcohol and drug consumption (e.g., cannabis) and IPV use and victimization. Participants report the total number of days substances are used and the amount of substance used (e.g., standard drink units for alcohol) and the days on which IPV use and/or victimization occurred as well as each partner's specific IPV behaviors. The TLBF will be administered at baseline to study participation and at each subsequent time point.
2 months
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
Prazo: 2 months
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16) is a 36-item self-report measure that assesses 6 facets of emotion regulation: nonacceptance of emotional responses, difficulty engaging in goal-directed behavior, impulse control difficulties, lack of emotional awareness, limited access to emotion regulation strategies, and lack of emotional clarity. Respondents are asked to indicate how frequently each item applies to them, from 1 ("almost never, 0-10% of the time") to 5 ("almost always, 91-100% of the time"). Higher scores indicate greater difficulties with emotion regulation. The DERS has demonstrated strong internal consistency and good construct validity among treatment-seeking adults.
2 months
Dyadic Adjustment Scale-7
Prazo: 2 months
The Dyadic Adjustment Scale-7 (DAS-7) is a psychometrically sound alternative to the original 32-item measure. The DAS-7 assesses domains of relationship functioning. Six items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale and 1 item is rated on a 7-point scale, for a total score ranging from 0-36 (higher scores indicate more positive relationship adjustment and less distress). The DAS-7 has demonstrated good internal consistency and construct validity and effectively discriminates between distressed and non-distressed couples.
2 months
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form
Prazo: 2 months
The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) is a 16-item self-report measure assessing overall enjoyment and satisfaction with life domains. Responses range from 1 ("not at all or never") to 5 ("frequently or all the time"). Fourteen items are summed to create a total score of 14-70, with higher scores indicating greater life satisfaction. There is no specific clinical cutoff score for this measure. The two items that are not included in the total score assess medications and overall life satisfaction. The Q-LES-Q-SF has demonstrated strong psychometric properties, is sensitive to change over time, and is suitable for assessing treatment outcomes.
2 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Julianne Christina Flanagan, PhD, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de janeiro de 2027

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

30 de setembro de 2030

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

30 de setembro de 2030

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

31 de julho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

31 de julho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

6 de agosto de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

6 de agosto de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

31 de julho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de julho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Palavras-chave

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • RRD4-006-25W
  • 194392 (Outro identificador: VA IRB)

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever