Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of an AI-powered Physician Assistant in Improving Patients' and Physician's Satisfaction in an Outpatient Setting of a Tertiary Care Hospital.

7 de agosto de 2026 atualizado por: Saqib Bakhshi, Aga Khan University

Patients' satisfaction depends on several factors, including health care costs, access to care, and the waiting time to see a healthcare professional. In Pakistan, hospitals face overcrowding, which in turn results in long waiting times, particularly in outpatient departments. Longer waiting times not only hurt patients' experience and hospitals' performance but also increase stress on the physicians.

These challenges can be addressed with the effective use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and related technologies. By leveraging machine learning algorithms and advanced data prediction models, AI can augment healthcare providers in clinical decision-making and streamline their work processes. However, these applications are largely studied and implemented in high-income countries, creating a lack of evidence from low- and middle-income countries.

Hence, a randomized controlled trial will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of an AI physician assistant in improving patient and physician satisfaction within outpateint clincis of a resource constrained setting.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Ainda não está recrutando

Intervenção / Tratamento

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

367

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

      • Karachi, Paquistão
        • Aga Khan University Hospital
        • Contato:
        • Contato:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Saqib Bakhshi

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria (Patients):

  • Informed consent before enrolment.
  • Adults aged 18 years and above.
  • Initial patients registering at the clinic during the entire trial duration.
  • Possession of a digital device for an OTP (one-time password)
  • Can read and write Urdu and/or English

Inclusion Criteria (Physicians):

  • Informed Consent
  • Agree to include AI physician assistant in their workflows

Exclusion Criteria (Patients):

  • Patients requiring emergency care
  • Patients who refuse to complete the history process with the AI physician assistant.

Exclusion Criteria (Physicians):

- Physicians from non-surgical specialties

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Outro
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: AI Physician Assistant

The intervention group will comprise participants enrolled in the application (AI physician assistant) in addition to the standard of care

The study participant allocated to the intervention will interact with the AI-physician assistant application "Hami" before they consult with the physician. The application will collect the medical history of the patient. This will then be followed by an AI-generated clinical summary, which their physicians will receive before the consultation begins. Physicians will review this summary and ask further questions of patients if required, and update the patient's record through an inbuilt scribe feature in the application.

The intervention evaluated here is an AI Physician Assistant. The assistant takes the patient's history using a specialty-specific line of questioning. Once the interaction ends, the application converts the information into an AI-generated clinical summary for physicians to review.

The physician reviews the summary and asks the patient additional questions, if required. Any additions or changes to the patient's history are recorded in the application. The physician then conducts a physical examination and can view AI-generated and guideline-based recommendations for assessment and treatment within the application. These recommendations may be selected, modified, or disregarded according to the physician's clinical expertise.

All additions to the patient's record can be entered manually or dictated verbally and automatically added through the application's ambient scribe feature. Once the treatment plan has been documented, the application generates a SOAP note.

Sem intervenção: Standard of Care
The arm will comprise participants who receive standard care. In surgical clinics, standard care involves residents seeing the patients before the physicians. However, as part of the study, we will include physicians who agree to see patients without residents taking the history first. Hence, the trial uses the term 'physician' as part of the control group or standard care terminology.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Patient's satisfaction
Prazo: Every day from each patient for a period of 2 months
Patient satisfaction is conceptualized through the lens of perceived quality of care, which is influenced by the effective utilization of waiting time and the provision of patient-centred care. Effective utilization of waiting time refers to patients' perceptions regarding whether their waiting time was used meaningfully during the visit. The domains of patient-centred care have been adapted from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) framework and include respect for patients' values and preferences, coordinated and integrated care, adequacy of information and communication, emotional support, involvement of family and friends, and physical comfort. These questions have been adapted based on the study objectives. The questionnaire will include demographic questions and five-point Likert-scale items (Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree) and one open-ended question to obtain additional feedback regarding patients' experiences and satisfaction.
Every day from each patient for a period of 2 months

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Physician Satisfaction
Prazo: From each physician at the end of each day for two months.

It will be assessed with regards to integration of an AI-powered physician assistant, focusing on usability, impact on workflow efficiency, evidence based treatment recommendations and improved patient-physician interaction.

Physician's satisfaction will be calculated utilizing mean scoring system, where each question will be scored on a 5 point Likert scale (Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree). Additionally, we will ask one open-ended question at the end of the survey as part of physician satisfaction. This tool will be made exclusively for this study and will undergo content validation.

From each physician at the end of each day for two months.
Mean consultation time
Prazo: Every day for each patient consultation for a period of 2 months

Consultation time (calculated in minutes) refers to the time taken by the physician while the patient is in the physician's room and the time taken by the physician for each of the following: to inquire about symptoms, conduct an examination, prescribe treatment, and provide counselling.

It will be measured using timestamps from a stopwatch from the time the patient enters the consultation room till the time they leave.

Every day for each patient consultation for a period of 2 months

Outras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Process flow evaluation outcome - Mean queuing time
Prazo: Every day for each patient visit for a period of 2 months

Mean queuing time for each patient before the consultation process begins. Queuing time (calculated in minutes) refers to the time spent by a patient in the waiting area after their registration has been completed till the start of their consultation.

It will be recorded using timestamps in two steps: one starting from the registration till the vitals are taken, secondly after vitals have been recorded till the patient visit the physician. These timings will be combined into a single aggregated time and will be calculated once for each patient.

Every day for each patient visit for a period of 2 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de setembro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de novembro de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de novembro de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

7 de agosto de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

7 de agosto de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

10 de agosto de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

10 de agosto de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

7 de agosto de 2026

Última verificação

1 de janeiro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 2026-12176-39541

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever