- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT07769619
Integrative AI-Based Multiomic and Neurophysiological Profiling of Chronic Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA-PAIN-AI)
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Descrição detalhada
Background and rationale. Chronic pain in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) represents a complex, multidimensional clinical phenomenon extending beyond the traditional paradigm of inflammation-driven nociception. Despite significant therapeutic advances enabling effective control of peripheral inflammation with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs and tsDMARDs), an estimated 20-30% of patients continues to experience persistent moderate-to-severe pain, even after achieving clinical remission. This therapeutic gap highlights the evolution of pain mechanisms from peripheral nociception toward central sensitization and nociplastic pain. Evidence from quantitative sensory testing (QST) studies demonstrates widespread pressure pain threshold reduction at sites remote from inflamed joints, indicating generalized central sensitization. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) protocols reveal impaired descending inhibitory pathways. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies show pathological hyperconnectivity between the default mode network and the insula, correlating with pain centralization independently of inflammatory markers. At the molecular level, transcriptomic analyses of human dorsal root ganglia have revealed pathological remodeling of primary sensory neurons, including ectopic immunoglobulin signaling and neurogenesis. Metabolomic and lipidomic profiling demonstrates hypoxia-driven glycolytic reprogramming, lactate accumulation acting as an independent algogen through acid-sensing ion channels, and glycerophospholipid metabolism disruption impairing production of specialized pro-resolving mediators. Integrative multi-omic studies have further identified distinct immunometabolic signatures between ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA, suggesting serotype-dependent pain mechanisms.
Study design. The RA-PAIN-AI study is designed as a prospective, observational, case-control study integrating clinical, laboratory, neurophysiological, and multiomic data. Two main groups are enrolled: a study group of patients with confirmed RA in an active phase of the disease, qualified for biological therapy according to the Polish national drug program B.33, and a control group of patients with RA in long-term remission (≥1.5 years) under biological therapy, without clinically significant chronic pain.
Non-interventional nature. The study is non-interventional. No experimental therapeutic interventions are administered as part of this study, and all biological analyses are performed ex vivo. All participants continue to receive standard clinical care according to routine rheumatology practice; study procedures are aligned with routine clinical visits whenever possible. Participation is associated with minimal risk. The primary procedures involving participants include venous blood collection, questionnaire assessments, and, optionally (at the discretion of the investigator), electroencephalography (EEG). The risks associated with these procedures are comparable to those encountered in routine clinical practice.
Study procedures - Visit 1 (Baseline, Day 0). All participants undergo: verification of eligibility criteria; collection of informed consent; clinical assessment and medical history; completion of standardized questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L, PHQ-9, VAS, DN4, painDETECT, HAQ, SF-36, FAS, ISI, HADS, GAD-7, CSQ, RS-25); peripheral blood collection (approximately 30 mL total). EEG assessment is performed in selected participants, at the discretion of the investigator.
Study procedures - Visit 2 (Follow-up, 3-6 months after baseline). Participants undergo repeat peripheral blood collection (approximately 10 mL), completion of standardized questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L, PHQ-9, VAS, DN4, painDETECT, HAQ, SF-36, FAS, ISI, HADS, GAD-7, CSQ, RS-25) and, in participants who underwent EEG at Visit 1, repeat EEG assessment, at the discretion of the investigator.
Key assessment tools. The study integrates three complementary assessment domains: (i) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) covering pain intensity and character (VAS, DN4, painDETECT), functional status (HAQ), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L, SF-36), psychological status (PHQ-9, HADS, GAD-7, CSQ, RS-25), and sleep quality (ISI), and fatigue (FAS); (ii)optional neurophysiological assessment by EEG (in selected participants, at the discretion of the investigator); and (iii) biological samples (peripheral blood) analyzed for multiomic and laboratory profiles, including whole genome sequencing (genomics), mRNA expression profiling (transcriptomics), and circulating protein measurement (secretomics).
Study setting. The study is conducted at the 4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic (4WSzKzP SPZOZ) in Wrocław, Poland, a tertiary referral center. Laboratory and multiomic analyses are conducted in collaboration with the Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences (IITD PAN; responsible for genomic and transcriptomic analyses) and the Biobank and Research Group at Łukasiewicz - PORT Polish Center for Technology Development (blood processing for genomic analysis and long-term biobanking). All procedures are conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines and applicable national regulations.
Analysis framework. All clinical, biological, and neurophysiological data will be analyzed using both conventional statistical methods and artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches. Statistical analyses will include descriptive statistics, between-group comparisons, correlation analyses, and multivariable analyses, as appropriate. In addition, AI methods, including dimensionality reduction, clustering, and supervised machine learning, will be used to identify distinct pain-related endotypes, develop predictive models for chronic pain persistence and treatment response, and support the transition from inflammation-centered management toward mechanism-based, personalized pain treatment in RA. The study also aims to create a structured, high-quality dataset and biobank resource to support future research in precision medicine and chronic pain in RA.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Estimado)
Contactos e Locais
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Wojciech Tanski, gen. bryg. dr hab. n. med.
- Número de telefone: 0048261 660 321
- E-mail: cwbk@4wsk.pl
Estude backup de contato
- Nome: Anna Skotny, dr n. med.
- E-mail: askotny@4wsk.pl
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Wroclaw, Polônia, 50-981
- Recrutamento
- 4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic (4WSzKzP SPZOZ)
-
Contato:
- Wojciech Tanski, gen. bryg. dr hab. n. med.
- Número de telefone: 0048261 660 204
- E-mail: cwbk@4wsk.pl
-
Investigador principal:
- Mariusz Kiszka, Płk lek.
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Método de amostragem
População do estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria - Study Group (Active RA)
- Age ≥18 years.
- Confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis according to applicable classification criteria.
- Active phase of the disease requiring initiation of biological therapy.
- Qualification for treatment under the national drug program B.33: "Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis with aggressive course (ICD-10: M05, M06, M08)".
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
- Willingness to participate in clinical assessments, EEG, biological sample collection, and questionnaire-based evaluation.
Exclusion Criteria - Study Group
- Contraindications to biological therapy as defined by the Polish Society of Rheumatology recommendations and the National Health Fund (NFZ) requirements under the B.33 drug program.
- Inability to provide informed consent.
- Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with study participation or data interpretation.
Inclusion Criteria - Control Group (RA in Remission)
- Age ≥18 years
- Confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.
- Ongoing biological therapy with sustained remission for at least 1.5 years and good tolerance of the treatment.
- No current chronic pain reported in the clinical interview.
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
- Willingness to participate in study procedures, including biological sampling, EEG and questionnaire assessments.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
Coortes e Intervenções
Grupo / Coorte |
|---|
|
Group 1 - Active RA With Chronic Pain (Study Group)
Group 1 - Active RA With Chronic Pain (Study Group) Description: Adult patients with confirmed rheumatoid arthritis in the active phase of disease, qualified for initiation of biological therapy under the Polish national drug program B.33 (Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis with aggressive course; ICD-10: M05, M06, M08). Participants undergo clinical assessment, biological sample collection (peripheral blood approximately 30 mL), standardized questionnaire evaluation, and, optionally (at the discretion of the investigator), EEG assessment. Intervention(s): No therapeutic intervention. Study procedures: blood collection, PROM assessment, optional EEG (at the discretion of the investigator), multiomic profiling (ex vivo). |
|
Group 2 - RA in Sustained Remission Without Chronic Pain (Control Group)
Description: Adult patients with confirmed rheumatoid arthritis in sustained clinical remission for at least 1.5 years under biological therapy, with good treatment tolerance and not reporting current chronic pain in clinical interview. Participants undergo the same assessment procedures as the study group. Intervention(s): No therapeutic intervention. Same study procedures as Group 1. |
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Multiomic Profiles Associated With Chronic Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Genomic, transcriptomic, and secretomic profiles associated with chronic pain in rheumatoid arthritis.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
|
Integrated Differentiation Between Study Groups
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Integrated clinical, biological, and neurophysiological features differentiating participants with active rheumatoid arthritis and chronic pain from participants with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission without clinically significant chronic pain.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
|
AI-Based Classification of Pain-Related Endotypes
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Development of integrative artificial intelligence-based models for classification of pain-related endotypes using clinical, multiomic, and neurophysiological data.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Intensity Assessed Using the Visual Analogue Scale.
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Self-reported pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale.
Scores range from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 mm indicates no pain and 100 mm indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
|
Functional Status Assessed Using the Health Assessment Questionnaire.
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Functional status will be assessed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire.
Scores range from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates no disability and 3 indicates severe disability.
Higher scores indicate worse functional status.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
|
Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed Using the EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels Index Value.
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels instrument.
The EQ-5D-5L index value will be calculated according to the applicable value set.
Index values generally range from values below 0 to 1, where 1 indicates full health, 0 indicates a health state equivalent to death, and values below 0 indicate health states valued as worse than death.
Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
|
Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed Using the Short Form Health Survey.
Prazo: Time Frame: Baseline, Day 0, and Visit 2, 3-6 months after baseline.
|
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Short Form Health Survey.
Domain scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale.
Higher scores indicate better health status / better health-related quality of life.
|
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 0, and Visit 2, 3-6 months after baseline.
|
|
Depressive Symptoms Assessed Using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Total scores range from 0 to 27.
Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
|
Sleep Quality Assessed Using the Insomnia Severity Index.
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Sleep quality / insomnia severity will be assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index.
Total scores range from 0 to 28.
Higher scores indicate greater insomnia severity and worse sleep quality.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
|
Between-Group Comparison of Genomic Profiles.
Prazo: Time Frame: Baseline, Day 0.
|
Genomic profiles will be compared between participants with active rheumatoid arthritis and chronic pain and participants with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission without clinically significant chronic pain using whole genome sequencing.
Results will be reported as genomic variants or genomic signatures associated with chronic pain status according to the Statistical Analysis Plan.
|
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 0.
|
|
Electroencephalography-Derived Markers of Altered Pain Processing.
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
In participants who undergo optional exploratory electroencephalography, predefined electroencephalography-derived markers of altered pain processing will be assessed according to the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Associations between each predefined electroencephalography-derived parameter and pain intensity and neuropathic pain features will be explored.
Results will be reported separately for each predefined electroencephalography parameter.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
|
Predictive Performance of an Integrative Biomarker Model for Chronic Pain Persistence.
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Predictive performance of an integrative biomarker model for chronic pain persistence at Visit 2 will be assessed using model performance metrics specified in the Statistical Analysis Plan, such as discrimination metrics for classification models.
Higher discrimination values indicate better predictive performance.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
|
Number of Participants Assigned to Each Multidimensional Pain Phenotype Cluster.
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Participants will be assigned to multidimensional pain phenotype clusters using an integrative analytical approach based on clinical, laboratory, patient-reported, neurophysiological, and multiomic variables, according to the Statistical Analysis Plan.
The outcome will be reported as the number of participants assigned to each derived phenotype cluster.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
|
Neuropathic Pain Features Assessed Using the DN4 Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire.
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Neuropathic pain features will be assessed using the DN4 Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire.
Total scores range from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more neuropathic pain features / greater likelihood of neuropathic pain.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
|
Fatigue Assessed Using the Fatigue Assessment Scale.
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Fatigue will be assessed using the Fatigue Assessment Scale.
Total scores range from 10 to 50.
Higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
|
Pain Coping Strategies Assessed Using the Coping Strategies Questionnaire.
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Pain coping strategies will be assessed using the Coping Strategies Questionnaire.
Coping-strategy subscales will be reported separately according to the questionnaire scoring instructions.
For each coping-strategy subscale, higher scores indicate greater use of the respective coping strategy.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
|
Psychological Resilience Assessed Using the Resilience Scale-25.
Prazo: Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
Psychological resilience will be assessed using the Resilience Scale-25.
Total scores range from 25 to 175.
Higher scores indicate greater psychological resilience.
|
Baseline (Day 0) and Visit 2 (3-6 months after baseline)
|
|
Anxiety Symptoms Assessed Using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale.
Prazo: Time Frame: Baseline, Day 0, and Visit 2, 3-6 months after baseline.
|
Anxiety symptoms will be assessed using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale.
Total scores range from 0 to 21.
Higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptom severity.
|
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 0, and Visit 2, 3-6 months after baseline.
|
|
Anxiety and Depression Symptoms Assessed Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Prazo: Time Frame: Baseline, Day 0, and Visit 2, 3-6 months after baseline.
|
Anxiety and depression symptoms will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
The instrument includes two subscales: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression.
Each subscale ranges from 0 to 21.
Higher scores indicate greater anxiety or depression symptom severity.
|
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 0, and Visit 2, 3-6 months after baseline.
|
|
Between-Group Comparison of Transcriptomic Profiles.
Prazo: Time Frame: Baseline, Day 0, and Visit 2, 3-6 months after baseline.
|
Transcriptomic profiles will be compared between participants with active rheumatoid arthritis and chronic pain and participants with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission without clinically significant chronic pain using messenger RNA expression profiling.
Results will be reported as differentially expressed transcripts or transcriptomic signatures associated with chronic pain status according to the Statistical Analysis Plan.
|
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 0, and Visit 2, 3-6 months after baseline.
|
|
Between-Group Comparison of Secretomic Profiles.
Prazo: Time Frame: Baseline, Day 0, and Visit 2, 3-6 months after baseline.
|
Secretomic profiles will be compared between participants with active rheumatoid arthritis and chronic pain and participants with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission without clinically significant chronic pain using quantitative measurement of circulating proteins.
Results will be reported as differentially abundant circulating proteins or secretomic signatures associated with chronic pain status according to the Statistical Analysis Plan.
|
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 0, and Visit 2, 3-6 months after baseline.
|
|
Predictive Performance of an Integrative Biomarker Model for Response to Biological Therapy.
Prazo: Time Frame: Baseline predictors; treatment response assessed at Visit 2, 3-6 months after baseline.
|
Predictive performance of an integrative biomarker model for response to biological therapy at Visit 2 will be assessed using model performance metrics specified in the Statistical Analysis Plan, such as discrimination metrics for classification models.
Higher discrimination values indicate better predictive performance.
|
Time Frame: Baseline predictors; treatment response assessed at Visit 2, 3-6 months after baseline.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Mariusz Kiszka, Płk lek., 4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic (4WSzKzP SPZOZ)
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
- Dor
- Manifestações Neurológicas
- Doenças musculoesqueléticas
- Artrite
- Doenças articulares
- Doenças Reumáticas
- Doenças do Tecido Conjuntivo
- Doenças autoimunes
- Doenças do sistema imunológico
- Condições Patológicas, Sinais e Sintomas
- Doenças da Pele e do Tecido Conjuntivo
- Sinais e sintomas
- Dor crônica
- Artrite, Reumatóide
- Dor Nociplásica
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 2023/ABM/02/00005/P/02
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .