Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Palmitoylethanolamide Modulates Central Sensitisation and Neuroinflammation in Chronic Low Back Pain

17 de agosto de 2026 atualizado por: Hager Essam Nasrallah, Beni-Suef University

Palmitoylethanolamide Modulates Central Sensitisation and Neuroinflammation in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Neurophysiological and Biomarker Correlates

Low back pain (LBP) is a public and occupational health problem that is a major professional, economic and social burden. Up to 84% of the general population will experience an episode of LBP during its life time, and recurrence rates are high. Acute LBP is the second reason for consultations in general medicine, and chronic LBP is the eighth. One in five LBP episodes result in sick leave. LBP represents 30% of sick leaves that are longer than 6 months, and 20% of work accidents. LBP has become the leading cause of exclusion from work before the age of 45, and the third cause of work disabilities in France.

In 2020 globally, LBP affected approximately 619 million people, making it the leading cause of disability worldwide. This number is projected to rise to 843 million by 2050, driven by population growth and aging.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Recrutamento

Condições

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

Chronic LBP is a heterogenous condition with mixed nociceptive and neuropathic components in many patients. Mechanisms that sustain chronicity include ongoing peripheral nociceptor sensitization, neuroimmune activation (mast cells, microglia), and maladaptive central nervous system plasticity (altered cortical excitability, changes in descending modulatory systems).

Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β have been implicated in maintenance of peripheral and central sensitization and the transition from acute to chronic pain. Measuring an inflammatory biomarker (e.g., serum TNF-α) alongside clinical pain and neurophysiological markers can therefore help test an anti-neuroinflammatory treatment hypothesis.

Today's management of chronic LBP includes analgesics (paracetamol), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, opioids, and topical treatments , with oral agents recommended as first-line therapy. Analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs target the nociceptive component of LBP without affecting neuropathic pain components, while opioids target both nociceptive and (to a lesser degree) neuropathic pain, and antidepressants target only the neuropathic component, although data concerning their efficacy is conflicting.

Analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs target the nociceptive component of LBP without affecting neuropathic pain components, while opioids target both nociceptive and (to a lesser degree) neuropathic pain, and antidepressants target only the neuropathic component, although data concerning their efficacy is conflicting.

Although relieving neuropathic pain to some extent, classical opioid analgesics suffer from frequent side effects, particularly at the gastrointestinal level that limit their long-term use. An innovative approach in the management of chronic pain diseases is represented by palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), a member of the N-acylethanolamine family, produced by most mammalian cells and which is particularly abundant in brain tissues.

PEA is involved in endogenous protective mechanisms activated by stimulation of inflammatory responses. PEA exerts its effects on cellular targets involved in the generation and maintenance of pain by down-modulating mast cell activation and controlling microglial cell behaviors.

PEA acts through several complementary mechanisms that are relevant to chronic pain: PEA is a ligand of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α); activation has anti-inflammatory and analgesic consequences., Mast cell stabilization / Autacoid Local Inflammation Antagonism (ALIA) mechanism: PEA reduces mast cell degranulation and local release of pro-nociceptive mediators, historically described as ALIA. Indirect endocannabinoid-modulating effects: PEA can indirectly modulate the endocannabinoid system, contributing to analgesia without psychotropic effects. Biomarkers can be used to aid diagnosis, clarify disease pathophysiology, classify the extent of a disease, indicate disease prognosis, and predict or monitor the disease over time and in response to interventions.

Central sensitization is defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) as an increased responsiveness of nociceptive neurons in the central nervous system to their normal or subthreshold afferent input . Historically, the discovery that injury at peripheral tissues induces hyperexcitability of spinal cord nociceptive neurons has prompted a massive research effort that has consistently confirmed enhanced responsiveness of central nociceptive pathways with different animal models.

One proposed biomarker for assessing CNS pathophysiology in chronic pain is transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). TMS uses electromagnetic induction to noninvasively generate an electrical current in the brain.TMS involves a high-current pulse generator that discharges an electrical current of several thousand amperes through an insulated metal stimulating coil for a period of < 1ms, generating a brief and focal magnetic field of approximately 1 to 2 Tesla-].

When the coil is placed on an individual's scalp overlying the primary motor cortex (M1), the magnetic field can induce an intracortical electric current sufficient to depolarize superficial corticospinal neurons and activate a target muscle leading to a measurable electromyographic responseThe neurotransmitters involved in various TMS-evoked measurements have been well characterized thus making TMS a putative biomarker for the study of chronic pain.

Mechanistic link between TNF-α and TMS measures:Neuroinflammation, characterized by elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), can profoundly influence cortical excitability. TNF-α modulates synaptic transmission by enhancing AMPA receptor trafficking to the postsynaptic membrane and reducing GABA_A receptor surface expression, leading to an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission.

This cytokine-driven shift toward hyperexcitability alters the functional state of intracortical circuits. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) provides a noninvasive means to quantify these changes: short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) reflects GABA_A-mediated inhibitory tone, while intracortical facilitation (ICF) reflects glutamatergic excitatory activity.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

106

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

  • Nome: Wael Fathy Hassan, M.D

Locais de estudo

      • Banī Suwayf, Egito
        • Recrutamento
        • Beni Suef University Hospital
        • Contato:
          • Mohamed Abdelbadie Ali, Lecturer
        • Contato:
          • Marwa Abd elsalam khames Elgaly, Lecturer

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • With chronic pain (more than 3 months)
  • Patients with NRS (4 -7)
  • MRI evidence of disc protrusion or prolapse limited to one or two lumbar discs, without extensive multi-level pathology
  • Diagnosed clinically with low back pain due to disc disease.
  • ASA I and ASA II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological disorders
  • psychiatric illness
  • pregnancy
  • prior spinal surgery
  • concurrent use of immunomodulatory drugs
  • contraindications to TMS.
  • Allergy to the drug

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: Micronized Palmitoylethanolamide Group
About 53 patients suffering from low back pain will receive Micronized Palmitoylethanolamide 600 mg tablets orally twice daily with the traditional treatment (NSAIDs, muscle relaxant and gabapentin): and physiotherapy for 6 months.
to evaluate the effect of PEA and traditional treatment versus traditional treatment alone for the patiens with chronic low back pain on pain intensity, disability and patient satisfaction at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Outros nomes:
  • traditional treatment
Comparador Ativo: Control group
About 53 patients suffering from low back pain will receive Traditional treatment (NSAIDs, Muscle relaxant, gabapentin) and physiotherapy.
to evaluate the effect of PEA and traditional treatment versus traditional treatment alone for the patiens with chronic low back pain on pain intensity, disability and patient satisfaction at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Outros nomes:
  • traditional treatment

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
Prazo: 6 Months
Number of Participants With Treatment by adjunctive Palmitoylethanolamide Assessed by reducing pain intensity from baseline to 3 months and 6 months following treatment initiation, as measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). NRS ranges from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst imaginable pain.
6 Months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Cadeira de estudo: Hatem Elmoutaz Mahmoud, M.D, Professor of Anaesthesiology,Surgical intensive care and pain management,Faculty of medicine

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

1 de janeiro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de junho de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

10 de junho de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

12 de agosto de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

17 de agosto de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

19 de agosto de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

19 de agosto de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

17 de agosto de 2026

Última verificação

1 de janeiro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • Chronic Low Back Pain

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever