Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Enamel Matrix Derivative and Xenograft for Mandibular Molar Furcation Defects

17 de agosto de 2026 atualizado por: Vy Truong Tuong Huynh, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative Combined With Xenograft in the Treatment of Furcation Defects in Mandibular Molars

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare two regenerative surgical approaches for the treatment of mandibular molar Class II furcation defects in patients with periodontitis. Eligible furcation defects will be randomly assigned to receive either xenograft bone combined with enamel matrix derivative (EMD) or xenograft bone combined with a collagen membrane. Both approaches are used to support periodontal tissue regeneration.

Participants will be followed for approximately 7 months. The study will evaluate postoperative pain and patient-reported satisfaction, periodontal clinical parameters, changes in furcation defect volume and relative bone density on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and changes in gingival crevicular fluid TWEAK levels. Clinical and radiographic outcomes will be assessed before surgery and during follow-up, including at 3 and 6 months after surgery.

The study is intended to determine whether xenograft bone combined with EMD provides clinical, radiographic, biological, and patient-reported outcomes comparable or superior to xenograft bone combined with a collagen membrane in the regenerative treatment of mandibular molar Class II furcation defects.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

This is a randomized controlled clinical trial involving patients with periodontitis who have Class II furcation defects affecting mandibular first and/or second molars. A total of 24 eligible teeth are planned, with 12 teeth assigned to each treatment group.

Before surgery, participants will undergo clinical periodontal examination, intraoral three-dimensional scanning, CBCT imaging, and gingival crevicular fluid collection. Clinical measurements include plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing pocket depth (PPD), vertical clinical attachment loss (VCAL), and horizontal clinical attachment loss (HCAL).

Eligible defects will be randomly assigned to one of two regenerative surgical treatments. Following flap elevation, debridement, root surface cleaning, and conditioning with 24% EDTA, the control group will receive xenograft bone covered with a resorbable collagen membrane. The experimental group will receive enamel matrix derivative applied to the defect-related root surface, followed by xenograft bone combined with enamel matrix derivative. The flap will then be repositioned and sutured.

Postoperative pain will be assessed using a visual analog scale, together with analgesic consumption and patient-reported satisfaction regarding swelling and chewing ability. Participants will return for follow-up at approximately 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. Gingival crevicular fluid will be collected during follow-up for measurement of TWEAK concentration.

At 3 months, selected periodontal and biological assessments will be repeated. At 6 months, periodontal clinical measurements, intraoral three-dimensional scanning, furcation defect classification, and CBCT imaging will be repeated to evaluate changes in defect volume and relative bone density.

The primary purpose of the study is to compare the regenerative effectiveness of xenograft bone combined with enamel matrix derivative with that of xenograft bone combined with a collagen membrane for the treatment of mandibular molar Class II furcation defects.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

24

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Binh Phu
      • Ho Chi Minh City, Binh Phu, Vietnã, 700000
        • Recrutamento
        • Faculty of Dentistry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) ≤ 20%.
  • Full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) ≤ 20%.
  • Willingness to participate in the study and provide informed consent.
  • Mandibular first and/or second molar with a buccal Class II furcation defect classified as subgroup A2 or B2.
  • Probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 5 mm at the eligible furcation site.
  • Keratinized gingival height ≥ 2 mm at the eligible site.
  • No gingival recession extending apically beyond the buccal furcation roof; the furcation entrance must not be clinically exposed above the gingival margin.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic diseases or conditions that may affect periodontal treatment outcomes, including uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, heart disease requiring anticoagulant therapy, hematologic disorders, or immunodeficiency.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Untreated endodontic pathology involving the study tooth.
  • Class III furcation involvement according to the Hamp classification.
  • Untreated occlusal trauma involving the study tooth.
  • Grade II tooth mobility that has not been stabilized by splinting, or Grade III tooth mobility according to the Miller classification.
  • Defective restorations at the surgical site, including overhanging, bulky, or poorly adapted restorations.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Xenograft + Enamel Matrix Derivative
Periodontal regenerative surgery is performed using xenograft bone combined with enamel matrix derivative (EMD). After flap elevation, thorough defect debridement, and root surface conditioning with 24% EDTA for 2 minutes, EMD is applied to the root surface associated with the furcation defect. The xenograft bone is mixed with EMD and placed to completely fill the defect. The flap is then repositioned and sutured.
Comparador Ativo: Xenograft + Collagen Membrane
Periodontal regenerative surgery is performed using xenograft bone combined with a resorbable collagen membrane. After flap elevation, thorough defect debridement, and root surface conditioning with 24% EDTA for 2 minutes, the xenograft bone is mixed with sterile saline and placed to completely fill the furcation defect. A trimmed resorbable collagen membrane is positioned to completely cover the defect and secured before flap repositioning and suturing.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD)
Prazo: Baseline and 6 months after surgery
Probing pocket depth (PPD) is measured in millimeters from the gingival margin to the base of the periodontal pocket using a UNC-15 periodontal probe at the mesiobuccal, buccal, and distobuccal sites of the treated tooth. Measurements are standardized using an individualized acrylic stent. The change in PPD from baseline to 6 months after surgery will be compared between the two treatment groups.
Baseline and 6 months after surgery
Change in Horizontal Clinical Attachment Loss (HCAL)
Prazo: Baseline and 6 months after surgery
Horizontal clinical attachment loss (HCAL) is measured in millimeters from the buccal entrance of the furcation to the deepest horizontal point of the furcation defect using a Nabers periodontal probe and an individualized acrylic stent.
Baseline and 6 months after surgery

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change in Vertical Clinical Attachment Loss (VCAL)
Prazo: Baseline and 6 months after surgery
Baseline and 6 months after surgery
Change in Buccal Gingival Recession (REC)
Prazo: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery
Change in Plaque Index (PI)
Prazo: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery
Change in Gingival Index (GI)
Prazo: Baseline and 6 months after surgery
Baseline and 6 months after surgery
Change in Furcation Defect Volume on CBCT
Prazo: Baseline and 6 months after surgery
Baseline and 6 months after surgery
Change in Relative Bone Density on CBCT
Prazo: Baseline and 6 months after surgery
Baseline and 6 months after surgery
Change in Gingival Crevicular Fluid TWEAK Concentration
Prazo: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery
Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery
Postoperative Pain Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Prazo: 12 hours, 24 hours, and 72 hours after surgery
12 hours, 24 hours, and 72 hours after surgery
Postoperative Analgesic Consumption
Prazo: During the first 3 days after surgery
During the first 3 days after surgery
Patient Satisfaction With Postoperative Swelling
Prazo: 3 and 7 days after surgery
Patient-reported satisfaction with postoperative swelling will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, and 5 = very satisfied. Higher scores indicate better satisfaction (better outcome).
3 and 7 days after surgery
Patient Satisfaction With Chewing Ability
Prazo: 3 and 7 days after surgery
Patient-reported satisfaction with chewing ability after surgery will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, and 5 = very satisfied. Higher scores indicate better satisfaction (better outcome).
3 and 7 days after surgery

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

29 de junho de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

29 de setembro de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

30 de setembro de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

12 de agosto de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

17 de agosto de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

20 de agosto de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

20 de agosto de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

17 de agosto de 2026

Última verificação

1 de agosto de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever