Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Graded Motor Imagery in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

30 de agosto de 2026 atualizado por: Zeynep Yıldız Kızkın, Artvin Coruh University

Is There an Advantage to Incorporating a Central Nervous System-targeted Intervention Within an Exercise Program for Individuals Diagnosed With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome? A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to investigate whether the addition of Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) to progressive neurodynamic exercises is more effective than progressive neurodynamic exercises alone in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The objectives are to reduce pain and symptom severity, improve pain, sensorimotor function, physical performance, and grip strength through the addition of GMI.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Ainda não está recrutando

Condições

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

46 voluntary patients with CTS, aged between 30-60 years will be randomly divided into two groups: GMI and progressive neurodynamic exercise group. Interventions will be applied for 6 weeks, 2 times a week (12 sessions). Both groups will receive progressive neurodynamic exercises and a nighttime resting splint. The GMI group will additionally receive Graded Motor Imagery, while the control group will receive no additional intervention. The patients will be assessed before, and after treatment. Upper extremity function and disability will be assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, cognitive status will be screened using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and symptom severity and functional status related to CTS will be evaluated using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ). Sensory function will be assessed using the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test and the Two-Point Discrimination Test, fine manual dexterity will be evaluated using the Purdue Pegboard Test, and hand grip strength will be measured using a Jamar hand dynamometer.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

46

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • mild to moderate unilateral CTS based on the Bland classification of electrodiagnostic testing ;
  • positive Phalen or Tinel tests;
  • symptoms such as paresthesia and pain associated with CTS that last longer than 3 months;
  • patients aged 30-60 years (when CTS becomes more prevalent);
  • patients who achieved a minimum score of 24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • bilateral CTS;
  • history of prior CTS surgery;
  • clinical indicators of cervical radiculopathy or polyneuropathy;
  • pregnancy or cognitive impairment;
  • the presence of orthopedic, neurological, or functional problems on the unaffected side that could affect hand function (e.g., history of trauma or surgery, peripheral nerve injury, tendinopathy, tenosynovitis, trigger finger, arthritis, sequelae of a fracture, etc.);
  • receipt of any conservative treatment for CTS within the last month.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Graded Motor Imagery
Each patient in the Graded Motor Imagery group will receive a treatment protocol consisting of Graded Motor Imagery, progressive neurodynamic exercises, and nighttime resting splints.
Outro: Graded Motor Imagery (GMI)

GMI includes three stages. GMI program will span over 6 weeks. The first 2 weeks will focus on lateralization, followed by 2 weeks of motor imagery, and the final 2 weeks will involve mirror therapy.

Lateralization: Patients will be asked to differentiate whether the hands shown in the Recognise™ Hand application belongs to the right or left side of their body.

Motor Imagery: Patients will be instructed to imagine slowly and smoothly moving their affected extremities to the posture depicted in the photos in the Recognise™ Hand application and then returning to the starting position.

Mirror Therapy: Using a mirror measuring 300 x 300 x 300 mm³ placed between the upper extremities, patients will be instructed to progressively move only their unaffected extremity, then their affected extremity, and finally both extremities.

Outro: Progressive Neurodynamic Exercise
The progressive neurodynamic exercises involved holding each position for 5 seconds. Each session included two sets of 10 repetitions (2×10). The treatment lasted for 30-minute sessions, conducted twice weekly over a total of 6 weeks.
Outro: Nighttime Resting Splint
The night splint was fitted with a wrist splint that keeps the wrist in a neutral position, permits finger flexion, maintains the wrist within a 0°-5° extension range, and ends just distal to the distal palmar crease.
Comparador Ativo: Progressive Neurodynamic Exercises
Each patient in the progressive neurodynamic exercises group will receive a treatment protocol consisting of progressive neurodynamic exercises and nighttime resting splints.
Outro: Progressive Neurodynamic Exercise
The progressive neurodynamic exercises involved holding each position for 5 seconds. Each session included two sets of 10 repetitions (2×10). The treatment lasted for 30-minute sessions, conducted twice weekly over a total of 6 weeks.
Outro: Nighttime Resting Splint
The night splint was fitted with a wrist splint that keeps the wrist in a neutral position, permits finger flexion, maintains the wrist within a 0°-5° extension range, and ends just distal to the distal palmar crease.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH)
Prazo: Baseline
DASH is a 30-item self-report tool assessing upper-extremity disability and symptoms, including daily activities, pain, numbness, joint stiffness, weakness, sleep issues, and psychological effects. Examples include turning a doorknob, changing a light bulb, and cutting food. Scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and impairment.
Baseline
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH)
Prazo: After the 6-week intervention
DASH is a 30-item self-report tool assessing upper-extremity disability and symptoms, including daily activities, pain, numbness, joint stiffness, weakness, sleep issues, and psychological effects. Examples include turning a doorknob, changing a light bulb, and cutting food. Scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and impairment.
After the 6-week intervention

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Mini exame do estado mental
Prazo: Linha de base
O Mini-Exame do Estado Mental (MEEM) será usado para avaliar o estado cognitivo dos pacientes. É composto por 11 questões e é avaliado numa escala de 30 pontos. Uma pontuação entre 24-30 é considerada normal, 18-23 indica comprometimento cognitivo leve e uma pontuação de 17 ou menos é indicativa de demência grave. O MMSE avalia orientação, memória, atenção, cálculo, recordação, linguagem, função motora, percepção e habilidades visuoespaciais.
Linha de base
Mini Mental State Examination
Prazo: After the 6-week intervention
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) will be used to assess the cognitive status of patients. It consists of 11 questions and is evaluated on a scale of 30 points. A score between 24-30 is considered normal, 18-23 indicates mild cognitive impairment, and a score of 17 or below is indicative of severe dementia. The MMSE assesses orientation, memory, attention, calculation, recall, language, motor function, perception, and visuospatial abilities.
After the 6-week intervention
Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ)
Prazo: Baseline
A patient-reported assessment uses a 5-point Likert scale with two subscales: the 11-item Symptom Severity Scale (CTSQ-S) for symptom intensity like numbness and pain, and the 8-item Functional Status Scale (CTSQ-F) for ADL ability such as writing and dressing. Higher scores mean more severe symptoms and impairment. The BCTQ shows high reliability, validity, and sensitivity to clinical changes.
Baseline
Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ)
Prazo: After the 6-week intervention
A patient-reported assessment uses a 5-point Likert scale with two subscales: the 11-item Symptom Severity Scale (CTSQ-S) for symptom intensity like numbness and pain, and the 8-item Functional Status Scale (CTSQ-F) for ADL ability such as writing and dressing. Higher scores mean more severe symptoms and impairment. The BCTQ shows high reliability, validity, and sensitivity to clinical changes.
After the 6-week intervention
The Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test
Prazo: Baseline
The assessment used a monofilament test (0.49-0.96), known for high sensitivity in diagnosing CTS. Sensory thresholds were checked at the radial tips of the thumbs, index, middle, and ring fingers. The monofilament was applied perpendicularly to the dorsal finger pads with eyes closed and the wrist in a neutral position. Pressure was applied for 1 to 1.5 seconds until slight bending of the filament. Lower readings indicate better sensory function; higher readings suggest worse light touch perception. A gauge of 2.83 grams is the normal threshold, while 3.22 grams or higher indicates moderate-to-severe sensory impairment in CTS.
Baseline
The Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test
Prazo: After the 6-week intervention
The assessment used a monofilament test (0.49-0.96), known for high sensitivity in diagnosing CTS. Sensory thresholds were checked at the radial tips of the thumbs, index, middle, and ring fingers. The monofilament was applied perpendicularly to the dorsal finger pads with eyes closed and the wrist in a neutral position. Pressure was applied for 1 to 1.5 seconds until slight bending of the filament. Lower readings indicate better sensory function; higher readings suggest worse light touch perception. A gauge of 2.83 grams is the normal threshold, while 3.22 grams or higher indicates moderate-to-severe sensory impairment in CTS.
After the 6-week intervention
Purdue Pegboard Test
Prazo: Baseline
The Purdue Pegboard consists of 50 holes in two columns, with pins, washers, and sleeves in four recesses at the top. Patients sat in front of the apparatus and performed four tests: the dominant hand, non-dominant hand, two-hand, and assembly test. For the hand tests, they inserted pins into holes with their hands for 30 seconds each; the two-hand test used both hands. In the assembly test, they placed materials in order: pin → washer → collars → washer within 60 seconds. Each test was repeated three times, and scores were averaged. This test assesses fine motor skills, coordination, finger dexterity, hand-eye coordination, and small object manipulation; lower scores indicate poorer hand skills.
Baseline
Purdue Pegboard Test
Prazo: After the 6-week intervention
The Purdue Pegboard consists of 50 holes in two columns, with pins, washers, and sleeves in four recesses at the top. Patients sat in front of the apparatus and performed four tests: the dominant hand, non-dominant hand, two-hand, and assembly test. For the hand tests, they inserted pins into holes with their hands for 30 seconds each; the two-hand test used both hands. In the assembly test, they placed materials in order: pin → washer → collars → washer within 60 seconds. Each test was repeated three times, and scores were averaged. This test assesses fine motor skills, coordination, finger dexterity, hand-eye coordination, and small object manipulation; lower scores indicate poorer hand skills.
After the 6-week intervention
The Two-Point Discrimination Test
Prazo: Baseline
The two-point discrimination threshold was evaluated using an esthesiometer applied to the pulp of the thumb, index, and middle fingers. During the evaluation, participants' eyes remained closed, and light stimuli, consisting of either one or two points, were randomly presented along the longitudinal axis of the fingers. The procedure began at a distance of 5 mm, with 10 trials conducted at each specified interval. If the participant failed to achieve at least seven correct responses, the distance was increased by 1 mm, and the test was repeated. The discrimination threshold was defined as the smallest distance at which at least seven out of ten responses were correct. Testing was discontinued at a maximum distance of 15 mm, with values below 6 mm considered within normal limits.
Baseline
The Two-Point Discrimination Test
Prazo: After the 6-week intervention
The two-point discrimination threshold was evaluated using an esthesiometer applied to the pulp of the thumb, index, and middle fingers. During the evaluation, participants' eyes remained closed, and light stimuli, consisting of either one or two points, were randomly presented along the longitudinal axis of the fingers. The procedure began at a distance of 5 mm, with 10 trials conducted at each specified interval. If the participant failed to achieve at least seven correct responses, the distance was increased by 1 mm, and the test was repeated. The discrimination threshold was defined as the smallest distance at which at least seven out of ten responses were correct. Testing was discontinued at a maximum distance of 15 mm, with values below 6 mm considered within normal limits.
After the 6-week intervention
Grip Strength
Prazo: Baseline
Grip strength was measured using a hand dynamometer. The participant sat comfortably with shoulder abducted, elbow at 90°, and forearm neutral. The wrist was between 0° and 30° extension. Each hand was tested three times with one-minute rests, and the average was recorded.
Baseline
Grip Strength
Prazo: After the 6-week intervention
Grip strength was measured using a hand dynamometer. The participant sat comfortably with shoulder abducted, elbow at 90°, and forearm neutral. The wrist was between 0° and 30° extension. Each hand was tested three times with one-minute rests, and the average was recorded.
After the 6-week intervention

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Artvin Coruh University

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Zeynep Yıldız Kızkın, Artvin Coruh University

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de março de 2027

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de julho de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

30 de dezembro de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

30 de agosto de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

30 de agosto de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

2 de setembro de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

2 de setembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

30 de agosto de 2026

Última verificação

1 de agosto de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Palavras-chave

Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • Graded Motor Imagery in CTS

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever