Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Benefits of Judicial Assistance Dogs for Child Victims in Child Advocacy and Pediatric Assessment Units (UAPEDs) (AudiCAJ)

3 de setembro de 2026 atualizado por: Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans

Child maltreatment is common and encompasses various forms, including psychological, physical, and sexual abuse, exposure to domestic violence, neglect, and sexual exploitation. Each year, French police and gendarmerie services record more than 50,000 child victims of intrafamilial violence, according to data from the Ministerial Statistical Service for Internal Security (SSMSI). Approximately two-thirds of these children are victims of physical violence and one-third are victims of sexual violence. These figures have increased steadily over recent years, particularly for sexual violence, in the context of greater disclosure by victims. Violence against children constitutes a major public health issue because of its short- and long-term physical, psychological, and developmental consequences, as well as the increased risk of involvement in future violence during adolescence or adulthood, either as victims or perpetrators.

Children presumed to be victims of abuse are managed in Child Advocacy and Pediatric Assessment Units (Unités d'Accueil Pédiatrique Enfance en Danger, UAPEDs) by multidisciplinary teams comprising physicians, psychologists, nurses, and social workers, following judicial referral or concerns raised by parents or caregivers. Depending on the circumstances, the child may undergo a forensic interview conducted on-site by law enforcement officers (police or gendarmerie), followed by a medico-legal and/or psychological assessment to evaluate the impact of the alleged abuse. This model enables comprehensive care to be delivered in a single location and within a limited timeframe, with professionals working around the child, thereby minimizing repeated disclosures and reducing the risk of retraumatization. The vast majority of forensic interviews are conducted by investigators trained in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) protocol for interviewing children.

It has been hypothesized that the involvement of a Judicial Assistance Dog (JAD) may provide benefits to children during forensic interviews, a key stage of the judicial process that can be highly stressful for child victims of abuse who are asked to recount traumatic experiences to an unfamiliar investigator.

For centuries, dogs have been domesticated to accompany humans. Since the late twentieth century, they have been specifically trained to assist vulnerable individuals, support people with chronic conditions, and participate in animal-assisted interventions. The role of dogs as part of healthcare and psychosocial support has been extensively studied in recent years. Animal-assisted interventions have been used in a variety of clinical settings with the aim of reducing anxiety, pain, and stress-related symptoms through mechanisms involving emotional regulation and attentional processes. Several studies have reported benefits among children with mental health conditions, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety disorders, and problematic video gaming behaviors. Assistance dogs are also frequently incorporated into interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder to promote prosocial behaviors, with beneficial interactions observed regardless of the child's verbal communication abilities. In pediatric hospital settings, animal-assisted therapy has been associated with reductions in both blood pressure and pain levels.

These effects may be mediated by physiological mechanisms. Exposure to a dog for 15 minutes has been associated with significant reductions in cortisol levels (13), while human-dog interactions have also been linked to changes in electroencephalographic activity and heart rate, potentially enhancing shared attention and emotional regulation.

The concept of the Judicial Assistance Dog first emerged in the United States in the early 2000s within court settings. In France, following a model similar to that developed in North America, the first Judicial Assistance Dog, named Lol, joined the Cahors Court of Justice in 2019 to support victims throughout judicial proceedings. Orko, the second Judicial Assistance Dog trained in France, joined the Child Advocacy and Pediatric Assessment Unit of Orléans University Hospital in 2020.

Several potential benefits of Judicial Assistance Dogs during forensic interviews have been suggested, including reductions in signs of distress and anxiety among child victims. A study conducted in the United States demonstrated significant decreases in heart rate and blood pressure among presumed child victims of sexual abuse who were accompanied by an assistance dog during the forensic process.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

This study aims to measure the anxious state of the minor when he first arrives at the unit (T0) and 10 minutes later (T1) with or without the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog (JAD).

The minor is randomized in one of the two groups of the study:

  • the interventional group (minor in the dedicated waiting room with the JAD for 10min)
  • or the control group (minor in the dedicated waiting room without the JAD for 10min).

Then an anxiety measure occurs. Two time point are evaluated: at arrival (T0) and after waiting 10min (T1):

  1. Anxiety questionnaire: STAI-C translated in French answered with the help of a registered nurse trained for psychometric tests (10 min)
  2. Anxiety level self-assessment (2 min)
  3. Cardiac frequency measure by the registered nurse in charge of the minor (5 min): an average of 3 measures will be taken

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

46

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

      • Orléans, França, 45067
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Orléans

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Filho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. First-time interview in a child advocacy and pediatric assessment unit (UAPED)
  2. Age ≥ 7 years
  3. Ability to understand and complete the Stat-trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-C)
  4. Written informed consent obtained from the child's legal guardian

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous contact with the Judicial Assistant Dog
  2. Known dog allergy
  3. Lack of informed consent from the legal guardian
  4. Lack of assent from the child

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Cuidados de suporte
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Judicial Assistance Dog group
Children assigned to this group will have contact with the Judicial Assistance Dog before the forensic interview.
After randomization, the Judicial Assistance Dog will be introduced to the child in the waiting room, and the child will remain in contact with the dog for 10 minutes.
Sem intervenção: Standard waiting room group
Children assigned to this group will undergo the standard pre-interview waiting period without contact with the Judicial Assistance Dog.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
To evaluate the effect of the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog on the chil's anxiety level prior to the forensic interview.
Prazo: At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting
Comparison of the change in STAI-C scores between T1 (after 10 min of waiting) and T0 (baseline assessment upon arrival) between the intervention group (10-minute exposure to the Judicial Assistance Dog) and the control group (10 minutes in a standard waiting room)
At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
To evaluate the effect of the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog on heart rate
Prazo: At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting
Comparison of the change in heart rate (beats per minute, bpm) between T1 (after 10 minutes of waiting) and T0 (baseline assessment upon arrival) between the intervention group (10-minute exposure to the judicial assistant dog) and the control group (10 minutes in a standard waiting room)
At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting
To evaluate the effect of the presence of a Judicial Assistance Dog on perceived anxiety
Prazo: At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting
Comparison of the change in score on the Anxiety Level Self-Assessment Scale between T1 (after 10 minutes of waiting) and T0 (baseline assessment upon arrival) between the intervention group (10-minute exposure to the judicial assistant dog) and the control group (10 minutes in a standard waiting room).
At T0: Baseline assessment upon arrival At T1: After 10 minutes of waiting

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Sarah EID, Doctor, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Orléans

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de outubro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de abril de 2028

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de abril de 2028

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

3 de setembro de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

3 de setembro de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

10 de setembro de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

10 de setembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

3 de setembro de 2026

Última verificação

1 de setembro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

INDECISO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever