Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Fracture Surgery

3 de novembro de 2026 atualizado por: Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael, Beni-Suef University

Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Patients With Fracture Neck of Femur Undergoing Hip Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare two different nerve block techniques-the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block and the Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESPB)-for managing pain after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients.

Hip fractures are common in older adults and often cause significant pain. Managing this pain effectively helps patients recover faster and move around sooner after surgery. Traditional pain relief options include nerve blocks and strong pain medications (opioids). However, opioids can cause unwanted side effects like nausea and drowsiness, while some traditional nerve blocks can weaken the leg muscles, making early walking difficult.

Nerve blocks inject a local anesthetic (numbing medication) around specific nerves or within muscle layers to temporarily block pain signals:

  1. PENG Block: Targets the specific sensory nerves supplying the front of the hip joint while minimizing leg muscle weakness.
  2. Lumbar ESPB: Injects numbing medication near the lower spine to block pain signals coming from the hip region.

Participants in this study will include adults aged 60 and older undergoing hip surgery for a femoral neck fracture under spinal anesthesia. Participants will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to receive either the PENG block or the Lumbar ESPB before their surgery. Both blocks are performed under ultrasound guidance to ensure precise medication placement.

Researchers will compare:

  • Pain levels at rest and during movement over the first 48 hours after surgery.
  • The total amount of additional pain medication (opioids) required.
  • Leg muscle (quadriceps) strength after surgery.
  • Any side effects or complications, as well as the overall length of hospital stay.

The findings from this study will help doctors determine which nerve block provides better pain relief while preserving leg strength, aiding in safer and faster recovery for elderly patients after hip surgery.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE:

Hip fractures in elderly patients are associated with significant morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and functional decline. Effective perioperative analgesia is crucial for early recovery. While systemic opioids and conventional nerve blocks (such as femoral or fascia iliaca blocks) provide pain relief, they are often limited by quadriceps weakness, opioid-related side effects, and delayed mobilization.

The Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block targets the articular branches of the femoral, obturator, and accessory obturator nerves supplying the anterior hip capsule, offering motor-sparing analgesia. The lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) is a paraspinal fascial plane block allowing craniocaudal local anesthetic spread to dorsal and ventral rami. Head-to-head evidence comparing L-ESPB and PENG blocks in patients with femoral neck fractures undergoing hip surgery remains limited.

STUDY PROTOCOL & INTERVENTIONS:

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial evaluates elderly patients (age ≥60 years, ASA II-III) undergoing hip surgery (hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty) under spinal anesthesia.

Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either:

  1. Group P: Ultrasound-guided PENG block using 20-25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine.
  2. Group E: Ultrasound-guided L-ESPB at L3/L4 level using 25-30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine.

Blocks are performed 20 minutes preoperatively by a dedicated anesthetist not involved in outcome assessment. All patients receive standardized intraoperative spinal anesthesia and postoperative multimodal systemic analgesia (scheduled IV/oral paracetamol with IV pethidine as rescue analgesia). Pain scores at rest and on movement, cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption, quadriceps strength (MRC scale), block-related complications, and length of hospital stay will be evaluated.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

64

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Locais de estudo

      • Banī Suwayf, Egito, 62515
        • Beni-Suef University Hospital

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

60 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 60 years or older.
  2. Unilateral fracture neck of femur scheduled for hip surgery (hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty) under spinal anesthesia (with or without light sedation).
  3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II-III.
  4. Ability to understand and use Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scoring and to provide informed consent (or availability of a legally authorized representative according to local regulations).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient refusal to participate.
  2. Coagulopathy (platelet count < 100,000/µL, INR > 1.4) or ongoing therapeutic anticoagulation that precludes deep peripheral or neuraxial blocks per current guidelines.
  3. Infection at the injection site, systemic sepsis, or hemodynamic instability.
  4. Pre-existing significant neurological deficit in the involved lower limb, advanced peripheral neuropathy, or cognitive impairment precluding reliable pain assessment.
  5. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to amide local anesthetics or study medications.
  6. Severe chronic opioid use (defined as > 30 mg oral morphine equivalent daily for > 3 months).
  7. Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35 kg/m² if considered to significantly hinder ultrasound visualization, at investigator discretion.
  8. Prior hip surgery on the same side or severe anatomical hip deformity affecting block performance.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Dobro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: PENG Block

Patients receive an ultrasound-guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block preoperatively using 20-25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (50-62.5 mg) deposited in the fascial plane between the iliopsoas tendon and pubic ramus near the iliopubical eminence (IPE). Standard spinal anesthesia and postoperative multimodal systemic analgesia are administered.

Ultrasound-guided nerve block performed 20 minutes preoperatively in the supine position. A 22G echogenic needle is directed in-plane lateral-to-medial to target the fascial plane deep to the iliopsoas tendon. Following negative aspiration and hydrodissection (2-3 mL saline), 20-25 mL bupivacaine 0.25% (or 15-20 mL in frail/small patients) is injected in 3-5 mL aliquots.

Outros nomes:
  • Bloco PENG
Comparador Ativo: Lumbar ESPB

Patients receive an ultrasound-guided Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESPB) preoperatively at the L3 or L4 transverse process level using 25-30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (62.5-75 mg) deposited deep to the erector spinae muscle. Standard spinal anesthesia and postoperative multimodal systemic analgesia are administered.

Ultrasound-guided fascial plane block performed 20 minutes preoperatively in the lateral decubitus or sitting position. A 22G echogenic needle is advanced in-plane cranial-to-caudal to contact the L3 or L4 transverse process. Following negative aspiration and hydrodissection confirming muscle lifting, 25-30 mL bupivacaine 0.25% is injected in 3-5 mL aliquots.

Outros nomes:
  • L-ESPB
  • Lumbar ESPB

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Postoperative Pain Score on Movement at 12 Hours
Prazo: 12 hours after the end of surgery

Pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Pain is evaluated during gentle passive leg movement (flexion or rotation) of the operated limb.

12 hours after the end of surgery

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Postoperative Pain Scores at Rest and Movement at Specified Time Points
Prazo: 30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after surgery

Pain intensity measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain) at rest and during gentle passive movement of the operated limb.

30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after surgery
Cumulative Opioid Consumption in the First 24 Hours
Prazo: First 24 hours postoperatively

Total dose of intravenous pethidine (meperidine) administered as rescue analgesia in milligrams (mg).

First 24 hours postoperatively
Time to First Rescue Analgesic Request
Prazo: Up to 48 hours postoperatively

Duration of time measured in hours from the end of surgery until the patient requests the first dose of rescue IV pethidine.

Up to 48 hours postoperatively
Quadriceps Motor Function (Knee Extension Strength)
Prazo: At 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively

Evaluation of ipsilateral quadriceps muscle strength using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, ranging from 0 (no movement) to 5 (normal strength). Motor weakness is defined as an MRC grade ≤ 3/5.

At 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
Incidence of Block-Related Complications and Opioid-Related Adverse Events
Prazo: Up to 48 hours postoperatively

Percentage of participants experiencing adverse events including postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pruritus, urinary retention, hypotension, bradycardia, signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), hematoma, injection site infection, neurological deficit/nerve injury, or falls.

Up to 48 hours postoperatively
Length of Hospital Stay
Prazo: From date of surgery until hospital discharge (up to approximately 30 days)

Duration of time from surgery completion until discharge from the hospital, measured in total days.

From date of surgery until hospital discharge (up to approximately 30 days)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

5 de novembro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

30 de abril de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

15 de maio de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

27 de outubro de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

27 de outubro de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

2 de novembro de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

4 de novembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

3 de novembro de 2026

Última verificação

1 de outubro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

SIM

Descrição do plano IPD

Individual de-identified participant data underlying the published primary and secondary results (including demographic data, baseline characteristics, NRS pain scores, cumulative opioid consumption, quadriceps motor strength scores, and adverse events) will be made available upon reasonable request to qualified academic researchers.

Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD

Data will become available starting 6 months following publication of the primary manuscript in a peer-reviewed journal and will remain accessible for up to 3 years.

Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD

Data will be shared with researchers whose proposed use has been approved by an independent review committee or the principal investigator to achieve the aims of an approved scientific proposal. Requests should be directed to the Principal Investigator (Dr. Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael) via email. A signed Data Use Agreement (DUA) may be required.

Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
  • SEIVA

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever