- ICH GCP
- Реестр клинических исследований США
- Клиническое испытание NCT01045993
A Study To Evaluate Methods To Evaluate Back Pain
21 февраля 2013 г. обновлено: Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
A Pilot Study To Evaluate Various Methodologies For Assessing The Treatment Of Low Back Pain
The study is designed to assess methods used in clinical research.
Обзор исследования
Статус
Завершенный
Условия
Вмешательство/лечение
Тип исследования
Интервенционный
Регистрация (Действительный)
61
Фаза
- Непригодный
Контакты и местонахождение
В этом разделе приведены контактные данные лиц, проводящих исследование, и информация о том, где проводится это исследование.
Места учебы
-
-
California
-
Loma Linda, California, Соединенные Штаты, 92350
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Критерии участия
Исследователи ищут людей, которые соответствуют определенному описанию, называемому критериям приемлемости. Некоторыми примерами этих критериев являются общее состояние здоровья человека или предшествующее лечение.
Критерии приемлемости
Возраст, подходящий для обучения
От 18 лет до 55 лет (Взрослый)
Принимает здоровых добровольцев
Нет
Полы, имеющие право на обучение
Все
Описание
Inclusion Criteria:
- Lower back pain
- Male or female in generally good health, from 18 to 55 years of age (inclusive)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or lactating
- Subject has evidence or history of radiculopathy, i.e. sciatica extending below the knee (numbness, tingling, or shooting pain), or other neurologic deficits (abnormal straight leg raise test, patellar reflexes, and/or bowel and bladder function);
- Subject has a history of previous back surgery;
- Subject has back pain resulting from traumatic injury involving physical evidence of bruising, swelling, or inflammation to the abdomen or low back area which occurred less than 48 hours prior to enrollment
- Has taken an investigational drug within the past 30 days prior to entering the study, or currently enrolled in another investigational study
- Is a member or relative of the study site staff, CRO or Sponsor organization directly involved with the study or had a household member or relative participate concurrently or previously in this study
- Has previously been enrolled in this study
Учебный план
В этом разделе представлена подробная информация о плане исследования, в том числе о том, как планируется исследование и что оно измеряет.
Как устроено исследование?
Детали дизайна
- Основная цель: Уход
- Распределение: Рандомизированный
- Интервенционная модель: Параллельное назначение
- Маскировка: Одинокий
Оружие и интервенции
Группа участников / Армия |
Вмешательство/лечение |
|---|---|
|
Активный компаратор: 1
Heat device
|
8-Hour Heatwrap
Другие имена:
|
|
Фальшивый компаратор: 2
Placebo arm
|
Inactive wrap worn for 8 hours
|
|
Активный компаратор: 3
Marketed analgesic
|
2 x 200 mg ibuprofen tablets
|
|
Плацебо Компаратор: 4
(Oral) Placebo comparator
|
2 x placebo tablets
|
Что измеряет исследование?
Первичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to First Perceptible Relief (Confirmed by Meaningful Relief)
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) up to 4 hours
|
"First perceptible relief" defined as the elapsed time from wrap application or oral treatment until the participant depressed the first stopwatch labeled "first perceptible relief" (any pain relieving effect), provided the participant also depressed the second stopwatch labeled "meaningful relief" (meaningful to participant) by the end of the scheduled in-patient evaluation (4 hours / 240 minutes).
If the confirmation was not achieved, the participant was censored at the time when the first stopwatch was depressed.
Confidence interval (CI) calculated using the method of Simon & Lee.
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) up to 4 hours
|
Вторичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Meaningful Relief
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) up to 4 hours
|
Time to "meaningful relief" defined as elapsed time from start of treatment until participant depressed the second stopwatch indicating "meaningful relief" (meaningful to participant).
Participant consider censored if participant did not depress the stopwatch by end of 4-hour in-patient evaluation, or became a treatment failure (rescue or discontinuation) during the time prior to depressing the second stopwatch.
Censoring was at time of dropout if participant withdrew for non-efficacy related reasons during the 4-hour in-patient portion of the study.
CI calculated using method of Simon & Lee.
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) up to 4 hours
|
|
Time Weighted Sum of Pain Relief From 0 Through 8 Hours (TOTPAR 0-8)
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) up to 8 hours
|
TOTPAR 0-8 sum of pain relief from 0 through 8 hours, weighted by the time duration between the current timepoint and the previous timepoint.
Pain relief rated hourly (from baseline) by the participant on a 6-point scale: 0=no relief, 1=a little relief, 2=less than half relief, 3=more than half relief, 4=a lot of relief, 5=complete relief.
Total possible score 0 to 40; higher score indicated better relief.
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) up to 8 hours
|
|
Time Weighted Sum of Change From Baseline in the Back Stiffness Score Over 8 Hours
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) up to 8 hours
|
Time weighted sum of change calculated as sum of change from baseline in back stiffness scores from 0 through 8 hours, weighted by time duration between current timepoint and previous timepoint.
Based on hourly (from baseline) back stiffness assessment rating from 0 (no muscle stiffness) to 100 (most possible muscle stiffness).
Sum of change derived by subtracting score at post-dosing time point from baseline score.
Total possible score -800 to 800; higher positive value was indicative of greater improvement.
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) up to 8 hours
|
|
Time to Treatment Failure
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) up to 8 hours
|
Time to treatment failure defined as time from dosing to the time of rescue medication within the scheduled duration of the study (8 hours); or for participants who withdrew from the study due to lack of efficacy without taking rescue medication, the time of the last assessment was considered the time to treatment failure; or if participant did not take rescue medication, or did not discontinue due to lack of efficacy, the time to treatment failure was considered censored at 8 hours (the scheduled duration of the study).
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) up to 8 hours
|
|
Individual Time-Point Pain Relief Scores
Временное ограничение: At 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, and 480 minutes
|
Pain relief rated hourly (from baseline) by the participant on a 6-point scale: 0=no relief, 1=a little relief, 2=less than half relief, 3=more than half relief, 4=a lot of relief, 5=complete relief.
|
At 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, and 480 minutes
|
|
Change From Baseline in Individual Time-point Back Stiffness Scores
Временное ограничение: At 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, and 480 minutes
|
Low back muscle stiffness rated hourly (from baseline) by the participant by placing a line on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 millimeters (mm) to 100 mm in length with 0=no muscle stiffness up to 100 (most possible stiffness).
|
At 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, and 480 minutes
|
|
Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Combined Flexibility Score: Extension
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
Flexibility assessed using Paris Plinth table with maximum extension (as if performing a sit-up) of 20 degrees movement.
Angle at Bsl and at 4 hours standardized to 100 for assessment of maximum angle (x degrees), x degrees minus 5, and x degrees plus 5. Flexibility score derived using standardized value and VAS score (participant rating of pain by marking level of pain on 100 mm line 0=no pain up to 100=worst pain).
Final derived data for extension flexibility were average of the extension flexibility data on the combined score (range -66 to 552); higher value indicated greater improvement.
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
|
Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Overall Combined Flexibility Score: Side-to-Side
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
Flexibility assessed using Paris Plinth table with maximum side-to-side movement of plus or minus (+/-) 10 degrees for left, and right (L, R), movement.
Angle at Bsl and 4 hours standardized to 100 for assessment of maximum angle (x degrees), x degrees - 5, and x degrees + 5. Flexibility score derived using standardized value and VAS score (participant rating of level of pain on 100 mm line 0=no pain to 100=worst pain).
Final derived data for overall flexibility was the average of side-to-side (L, R) flexibility data on the combined score (range -81 to 264); higher value=greater improvement.
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
|
Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Overall Combined Flexibility Score: Rotation
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
Flexibility assessed using Paris Plinth table with maximum rotation at waist of plus or minus (+/-) 30 degrees for left, and right (L, R), movement.
Angle at Bsl and at 4 hours standardized to 100 for assessment of maximum angle (x degrees), x degrees - 5, and x degrees + 5. Flexibility score derived using standardized value and VAS score (participant rating of level of pain on 100 mm line 0=no pain up to 100=worst pain).
Final derived data for overall flexibility were the average of rotation (L, R) flexibility data on combined score (range -80 to 155); higher value=greater improvement.
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Angle Measurement at Maximum Flexion for Flexibility Measures: Extension
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
Participant placed in a prone position on Paris Plinth table which is moved at 1 degree per second to maximum movement of 20 degrees for extension (as if performing a sit-up) to the degree of movement at which participant perceives discomfort or pain.
Higher score indicated greater improvement.
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Angle Measurement at Maximum Flexion for Flexibility Measures: Side-to-Side
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
Participant placed in a prone position on Paris Plinth table which is moved at 1 degree per second to maximum movement +/- 10 degrees for left, and right, side-to-side movement to the degree of movement at which participant perceives discomfort or pain.
Maximum flexion based on the average of the left and right side-to-side scores.
Higher score indicated greater improvement.
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Angle Measurement at Maximum Flexion for Flexibility Measures: Rotation
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
Participant placed in a prone position on Paris Plinth table which is moved at 1 degree per second to maximum rotation at waist of +/- 30 degrees for left, and right, movement to the degree of movement at which participant perceives discomfort or pain.
Maximum flexion based on the average of the left and right rotation scores.
Higher score indicated greater improvement.
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
|
Change From Baseline (Bsl) in Pain Measurement for Flexibility Measure: Extension
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
Flexibility assessed using Paris Plinth table with maximum extension of 20 degrees movement (as if performing a sit-up).
When participant feels discomfort or pain, participant places a mark to rate discomfort/pain (maximum) on a VAS of 100 mm in length with 0=no discomfort/no pain up to 100=most discomfort/most pain.
Movement decreased 5 degrees (minus) and discomfort rated on VAS.
Movement increased 5 degrees (plus) beyond first point when pain was reported and discomfort/pain again rated on the VAS.
Higher score indicated greater discomfort/pain.
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pain Measurement for Flexibility Measure: Side-to-Side
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
Flexibility assessed using Paris Plinth table with maximum side-to-side movement of +/- 10 degrees for L, R movement.
When participant feels discomfort or pain, participant places a mark to rate discomfort/pain (maximum) on a VAS of 100 mm in length with 0=no discomfort/no pain up to 100=most discomfort/most pain.
Movement decreased 5 degrees (minus) and discomfort rated on VAS.
Movement increased 5 degrees (plus) beyond first point when pain was reported and discomfort/pain again rated on the VAS.
Analyses based on the average of L, R scores.
Higher score indicated greater discomfort/pain.
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pain Measurement for Flexibility Measure: Rotation
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
Flexibility assessed using Paris Plinth table with maximum rotation at waist of +/- 30 degrees for L, R movement.
When participant feels discomfort or pain, participant places a mark to rate discomfort/pain (maximum) on a VAS of 100 mm in length with 0=no discomfort/no pain up to 100=most discomfort/most pain.
Movement decreased 5 degrees (minus) and discomfort rated on VAS.
Movement increased 5 degrees (plus) beyond first point when pain was reported and discomfort/pain again rated on the VAS.
Analyses based on the average of L, R scores.
Higher score indicated greater discomfort/pain.
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) and 4 hours
|
|
Number of Participants Per Categorical Score for Global Assessment of Study Treatment
Временное ограничение: Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) up to 8 hours
|
At hour 8, or at the time of rescue, if it occurred, participants performed a global assessment in their diary in response to the question: How would you rate the study treatment as a pain reliever?
Very Poor=0, Poor=1, Fair=2, Good=3, Very Good=4, Excellent=5.
|
Baseline (time of wrap application or oral treatment administration) up to 8 hours
|
Соавторы и исследователи
Здесь вы найдете людей и организации, участвующие в этом исследовании.
Публикации и полезные ссылки
Лицо, ответственное за внесение сведений об исследовании, добровольно предоставляет эти публикации. Это может быть что угодно, связанное с исследованием.
Даты записи исследования
Эти даты отслеживают ход отправки отчетов об исследованиях и сводных результатов на сайт ClinicalTrials.gov. Записи исследований и сообщаемые результаты проверяются Национальной медицинской библиотекой (NLM), чтобы убедиться, что они соответствуют определенным стандартам контроля качества, прежде чем публиковать их на общедоступном веб-сайте.
Изучение основных дат
Начало исследования
1 февраля 2010 г.
Первичное завершение (Действительный)
1 июля 2010 г.
Завершение исследования (Действительный)
1 июля 2010 г.
Даты регистрации исследования
Первый отправленный
8 января 2010 г.
Впервые представлено, что соответствует критериям контроля качества
8 января 2010 г.
Первый опубликованный (Оценивать)
11 января 2010 г.
Обновления учебных записей
Последнее опубликованное обновление (Оценивать)
1 апреля 2013 г.
Последнее отправленное обновление, отвечающее критериям контроля качества
21 февраля 2013 г.
Последняя проверка
1 февраля 2013 г.
Дополнительная информация
Термины, связанные с этим исследованием
Ключевые слова
Дополнительные соответствующие термины MeSH
Другие идентификационные номера исследования
- TC-09-20
Эта информация была получена непосредственно с веб-сайта clinicaltrials.gov без каких-либо изменений. Если у вас есть запросы на изменение, удаление или обновление сведений об исследовании, обращайтесь по адресу register@clinicaltrials.gov. Как только изменение будет реализовано на clinicaltrials.gov, оно будет автоматически обновлено и на нашем веб-сайте. .
Клинические исследования Heat Device
-
Boston Medical CenterEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...ЗавершенныйДетское ожирение | Технология лечения ожиренияСоединенные Штаты
-
Ohio State UniversityMedical University of South Carolina; Northwestern UniversityПрекращеноИнсульт | ПарезСоединенные Штаты
-
University of California, DavisThrasher Research Fund; California Department of Health Services; University Research...Завершенный
-
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...РекрутингТерминальная стадия почечной недостаточности на диализеКитай
-
University of RochesterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Еще не набираютРак молочной железы | Усталость, связанная с ракомСоединенные Штаты
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreЕще не набираютТравма Травма | Гипотермия | Массивное кровотечение
-
University Hospital, ToulouseПрекращено
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignЗавершенный
-
University of MinnesotaРекрутингШум в ушахСоединенные Штаты
-
Fundacion Miguel ServetРекрутингСосудистый доступ | Катетерная инфекция | Осложнение сосудистого доступа | Медсестра | Осложнения сосудистого доступа | Неисправность катетера | Управление медсестринским уходом | Терапевтическое лечение лекарств | Инновационные процедурыИспания