Pilot Testing ACCOMPANI: A Nurse-Targeted Intervention to Promote Psychosocial Equity in Pediatric Oncology (ACCOMPANI)
Pilot Testing ACCOMPANI: A Nurse?Targeted Intervention to Promote Psychosocial Equity in Pediatric Oncology
This study is evaluating ACCOMPANI, a nurse-targeted intervention intended to promote psychosocial equity in pediatric oncology nurses and stakeholders.
Обзор исследования
Статус
Вмешательство/лечение
Подробное описание
This protocol, titled "Pilot Testing ACCOMPANI: A Nurse-Targeted Intervention to Promote Psychosocial Equity in Pediatric Oncology," includes multiple study aims. For qualitative aims, participants will be recruited from the relevant pediatric oncology nurse population, and activities may include focus groups, stakeholder sessions, and semi-structured interviews conducted remotely or in approved private settings.
For the pilot intervention aim, nurse participants will attend four study visits, with sessions planned at approximately 30 minutes weekly. Participants will be randomized in waves until the target of 20 participants per group is reached for the intervention and usual care groups. Each intervention group will include 5 to 10 participants, and sessions will be offered on a rolling basis approximately 1 to 2 weeks apart depending on enrollment and study team availability.
Тип исследования
Регистрация (Оцененный)
Фаза
- Непригодный
Контакты и местонахождение
Контакты исследования
- Имя: Ijeoma Eche-Ugwu, MD
- Номер телефона: 857-215-1248
- Электронная почта: ijeomaj_eche@dfci.harvard.edu
Критерии участия
Критерии приемлемости
Возраст, подходящий для обучения
Принимает здоровых добровольцев
Полы, имеющие право на обучение
Описание
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pediatric oncology nurses who work at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute or Boston Children's Hospital in a:
- Full time OR Part time
- Provide direct care to children with cancer and their families
- Inpatient OR outpatient setting
- Age 18 years and older
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Nurses will be excluded if they are:
- In orientation OR
- no longer working as a bedside pediatric oncology nurse
Учебный план
Как устроено исследование?
Детали дизайна
- Основная цель: Поддерживающая терапия
- Распределение: Рандомизированный
- Интервенционная модель: Параллельное назначение
- Маскировка: Нет (открытая этикетка)
Оружие и интервенции
Группа участников / Армия |
Вмешательство/лечение |
|---|---|
|
Экспериментальный: ACCOMPANI Intervention
Nurse participants receive the ACCOMPANI intervention through four study visits. Sessions are planned to be about 30 minutes weekly, delivered in groups of 5-10 participants, with rolling scheduling based on enrollment and staff availability. Sessions occur in private areas within the DFCI/BCH campus. Participants are reminded of consent elements at the beginning of each session. |
Nurse participants receive the ACCOMPANI intervention through four study visits. Sessions are planned to be about 30 minutes weekly, delivered in groups of 5-10 participants, with rolling scheduling based on enrollment and staff availability. Sessions occur in private areas within the DFCI/BCH campus. Participants are reminded of consent elements at the beginning of each session. |
|
Активный компаратор: Usual Care
Participants in the comparator group are assigned to usual care. |
Participants in the comparator group are assigned to usual care. |
Что измеряет исследование?
Первичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Enrollment Rate
Временное ограничение: 6 months
|
Enrollment rate is defined as the proportion of approached nurses who enroll in the pilot randomized controlled trial. |
6 months
|
|
Intervention completion rate
Временное ограничение: Up to 5 weeks
|
Completion will be defined as the proportion of enrolled participants who complete the post-intervention follow-up survey assessment. |
Up to 5 weeks
|
|
Acceptability of Intervention (AIM) Rate
Временное ограничение: At post-intervention follow-up (T2), approximately 5 weeks after baseline.
|
The AIM assessment has 4 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree). A higher score is greater perceived acceptability. An overall score for each participant is calculated as the mean of the responses to the 4 items. The AIM rate is the proportion of particpants who have an overall mean score of 4 or higher. |
At post-intervention follow-up (T2), approximately 5 weeks after baseline.
|
|
Appropriateness of Intervention (IAM) Rate
Временное ограничение: At post-intervention follow-up (T2), approximately 5 weeks after baseline.
|
The IAM assessment has 4 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree). A higher score is greater perceived appropriateness. An overall score for each participant is calculated as the mean of the responses to the 4 items. The IAM rate is the proportion of particpants who have an overall mean score of 4 or higher. |
At post-intervention follow-up (T2), approximately 5 weeks after baseline.
|
Вторичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in New General Self-Efficacy Scale (NGSE) score from Baseline to Post-Intervention Follow-Up
Временное ограничение: At baseline and post-intervention follow-up (T2), up to approximately 5 weeks
|
The NGSE assessment has 8 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). A higher score is greater self-efficacy. An overall score for each participant is calculated as the mean of the responses to the 8 items. The change in NGSE score is the NGSE score at post-intervention follow-up less the NGSE score at baseline. |
At baseline and post-intervention follow-up (T2), up to approximately 5 weeks
|
|
Change in Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professionals-Revised (IAPCC-R) score from Baseline to Post-Intervention Follow-Up
Временное ограничение: At baseline and post-intervention follow-up (T2), up to approximately 5 weeks
|
The IAPCC-R assessment has 25 items scored on a 4-point scale (1 = strongly agree to 4 = strongly disagree). A higher score is greater self-efficacy. An overall score for each participant is calculated with a range of 25-100. The change in IAPCC-R score is the IAPCC-R score at post-intervention follow-up less the IAPCC-R score at baseline. |
At baseline and post-intervention follow-up (T2), up to approximately 5 weeks
|
|
Duration of Contact with Components of the Intervention
Временное ограничение: Weekly up to 4 weeks
|
The duration of contact with components of the intervention is measured in minutes for each week and summed across all 4 sessions. |
Weekly up to 4 weeks
|
|
Number of Components Accessed
Временное ограничение: Weekly up to 4 weeks
|
The number of components accessed is counted for each week and summed across all 4 sessions. |
Weekly up to 4 weeks
|
|
Number of Modules Completed
Временное ограничение: Weekly up to 4 weeks
|
The number of modules completed is counted for each week and summed across all 4 sessions. |
Weekly up to 4 weeks
|
|
Number of Access Attempts
Временное ограничение: Weekly up to 4 weeks
|
The number of access attempts is counted for each week and summed across all 4 sessions. |
Weekly up to 4 weeks
|
Соавторы и исследователи
Спонсор
Соавторы
Следователи
- Главный следователь: Ijeoma Eche-Ugwu, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Даты записи исследования
Изучение основных дат
Начало исследования (Оцененный)
Первичное завершение (Оцененный)
Завершение исследования (Оцененный)
Даты регистрации исследования
Первый отправленный
Впервые представлено, что соответствует критериям контроля качества
Первый опубликованный (Действительный)
Обновления учебных записей
Последнее опубликованное обновление (Действительный)
Последнее отправленное обновление, отвечающее критериям контроля качества
Последняя проверка
Дополнительная информация
Термины, связанные с этим исследованием
Ключевые слова
Дополнительные соответствующие термины MeSH
Другие идентификационные номера исследования
- 26-474
Планирование данных отдельных участников (IPD)
Планируете делиться данными об отдельных участниках (IPD)?
Описание плана IPD
The Harvard Cancer Consortium encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: [contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
Сроки обмена IPD
Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication
Критерии совместного доступа к IPD
Contact the Belfer office for Dana -Farber Innovations (BODFI) at innovations@dfci.harvard.edu
Совместное использование IPD Поддерживающий тип информации
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- САП
Информация о лекарствах и устройствах, исследовательские документы
Изучает лекарственный продукт, регулируемый FDA США.
Изучает продукт устройства, регулируемый Управлением по санитарному надзору за качеством пищевых продуктов и медикаментов США.
Эта информация была получена непосредственно с веб-сайта clinicaltrials.gov без каких-либо изменений. Если у вас есть запросы на изменение, удаление или обновление сведений об исследовании, обращайтесь по адресу register@clinicaltrials.gov. Как только изменение будет реализовано на clinicaltrials.gov, оно будет автоматически обновлено и на нашем веб-сайте. .