Evaluation of Fluid Biomarkers Around Implants Exhibiting Early Stage Periimplant Bone Loss
7 maj 2026 uppdaterad av: Raziye Tugce Can Keles, Pamukkale University
Evaluation of Biomarkers Involved In Bone Metabolism (Remodeling) In Periimplanter Crevicular Fluid of Implants With Early Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Clinical Study
This study aimed to compare biological mediators known to be important in peri-implant diseases in implants with and without early stage marginal bone loss.
A total of 118 implants in 59 patients were designated as test and control groups.
The radiographic and periodontal data of the included implants, along with peri-implant sulcus fluid samples, were evaluated.
Studieöversikt
Status
Avslutad
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljerad beskrivning
This study included clinical and radiographic records of patients who received implant treatment in the maxilla and/or mandible between 11/2021 and 9/2024.
Patients were divided into test and control groups based on the presence/absence of EMBL after prosthetic loading.
Periodontal clinical measurements were recorded and peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF) samples were collected.
Sclerostin, calprotectin, type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptide (NTx), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8, and MMP-9 levels were analyzed using ELISA.
Group comparisons were performed with the statistical analyses.
Studietyp
Observationell
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
59
Kontakter och platser
Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.
Studieorter
-
-
-
Denizli, Turkiet (Türkiye), 20160
- Pamukkale University, Faculty of Dentistry, Periodontology
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
- Barn
- Vuxen
- Äldre vuxen
Tar emot friska volontärer
Ja
Testmetod
Icke-sannolikhetsprov
Studera befolkning
Patients who received implant treatment at the Department of Periodontology, Pamukkale University Faculty of Dentistry.
Beskrivning
Inclusion Criteria:
- Presence of 1 mm or more of radiographic marginal bone loss within the first 3 months after implant placement
- Availability of radiographic documentation
- Availability of demographic data, surgical records, and data related to the implant used
- Physical condition classified as Class I and II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification
- Patients with no smoking history in the last 10 years
- Fixed implant-supported restorations
- Screw-retained implants
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients receiving and/or maintaining implant treatment at centers other than the Department of Periodontology, Pamukkale University Faculty of Dentistry
- Patients with incomplete or unreachable files or radiographic documentation
- Patients with a known systemic disease/condition that alters their physical condition or bone metabolism
- Severe bruxism cases
- Pregnant and breastfeeding patients
- Patients with incomplete implant-supported prosthesis
- Areas grafted during or before implant surgery
- Removable implant-supported restorations
- Cement-retained implants
- Patients undergoing peri-implantitis treatment
Studieplan
Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
Kohorter och interventioner
Grupp / Kohort |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Test
Presence of marginal bone loss of 1 mm or more within the first 3 months after implant placement
|
To evaluate biomarkers associated with peri-implant bone loss, periopaper was placed in the peri-implant pocket and absorbed with sulcus fluid.
Parallel cone technique was used during periapical imaging to accurately measure peri-implant bone loss.
|
|
Control
Presence of less than 1 mm of marginal bone loss within the first 3 months after implant placement
|
To evaluate biomarkers associated with peri-implant bone loss, periopaper was placed in the peri-implant pocket and absorbed with sulcus fluid.
Parallel cone technique was used during periapical imaging to accurately measure peri-implant bone loss.
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Calprotectin levels in peri-implant crevicular fluid
Tidsram: 6-8 week after prosthetic treatment
|
After collecting peri-implant sulcus fluid using the paper strip method, calprotectin levels in the peri-implant sulcus region were determined using the ELISA method and recorded in ng/ml.
|
6-8 week after prosthetic treatment
|
|
Sclerostin levels in peri-implant crevicular fluid
Tidsram: 6-8 week after prosthetic treatment
|
After collecting peri-implant sulcus fluid using the paper strip method, sclerostin levels in the peri-implant sulcus region were determined using the ELISA method and recorded in pg/ml.
|
6-8 week after prosthetic treatment
|
|
NTx levels in peri-implant crevicular fluid
Tidsram: 6-8 week after prosthetic treatment
|
After collecting peri-implant sulcus fluid using the paper strip method, NTx levels in the peri-implant sulcus region were determined using the ELISA method and recorded in ng/ml.
|
6-8 week after prosthetic treatment
|
|
MMP-8 levels in peri-implant crevicular fluid
Tidsram: 6-8 week after prosthetic treatment
|
After collecting peri-implant sulcus fluid using the paper strip method, MMP-8 levels in the peri-implant sulcus region were determined using the ELISA method and recorded in ng/ml.
|
6-8 week after prosthetic treatment
|
|
MMP-9 levels in peri-implant crevicular fluid
Tidsram: 6-8 week after prosthetic treatment
|
After collecting peri-implant sulcus fluid using the paper strip method, MMP-9 levels in the peri-implant sulcus region were determined using the ELISA method and recorded in ng/ml.
|
6-8 week after prosthetic treatment
|
Andra resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Radiographic detecting of Peri-implant marginal bone loss
Tidsram: Baseline, 3 months
|
The amount of marginal bone loss was determined by comparing the periapical radiograph taken on the day the implants were placed with the radiograph taken at 3 months.
Measurements of digital radiographic images were performed using computer software.
Then, study groups were determined according to the presence or absence of peri-implant marginal bone loss.
|
Baseline, 3 months
|
|
Modified Bleeding İndex
Tidsram: During the same session as the peri-implant fluid collection procedure
|
This assessment was performed based on the bleeding response following gentle probing with a plastic probe in the four regions of each implant (mesial, distal, palatal/lingual, and buccal).
The severity of bleeding observed within approximately 10-30 seconds after probing was scored and recorded.
The scoring system was graded as follows: 0: no bleeding, 1: bleeding at a single point, 2: bleeding at several points or in a linear pattern, 3: heavy bleeding following probing.
|
During the same session as the peri-implant fluid collection procedure
|
|
Peri-implant pocket depth
Tidsram: During the same session as the peri-implant fluid collection procedure
|
A plastic periodontal probe was used to determine peri-implant pocket depth.
Measurements were taken by using the probe, supported by its own weight, parallel to the long axis of the tooth.
Pocket depth was measured at 6 sites (mesio-buccal, buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-palatal/lingual, palatal/lingual, disto-palatal/lingual) for each implant included in the study and recorded in millimeters (mm).
The pocket depth value for each dental implant was obtained by calculating the average of the 6 measured values.
|
During the same session as the peri-implant fluid collection procedure
|
|
Gingival İndex
Tidsram: During the same session as the peri-implant fluid collection procedure
|
The mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual/palatal surfaces of each tooth/implant were evaluated separately, and the average of the scores obtained was recorded as the gingival index value for that tooth/implant.
Scoring during the evaluation was performed as follows: 0 = normal gingiva, 1 = mild inflammation (color change, mild edema, no bleeding on probing), 2 = moderate inflammation (redness, edema, bleeding on probing), 3 = severe inflammation (marked redness, edema, ulceration, spontaneous bleeding).
Subsequently, all values were summed and divided by the total number of teeth and implants to record the gingival index score.
|
During the same session as the peri-implant fluid collection procedure
|
|
Modified Plaque İndex
Tidsram: During the same session as the peri-implant fluid collection procedure
|
The mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual/palatal surfaces around the teeth/implants were examined, and the average of the scores obtained for each surface was recorded as the plaque index for that tooth/implant.
The scoring criteria were as follows: 0 = no plaque, 1 = plaque detectable only with a probe, 2 = soft plaque accumulation visible to the naked eye, 3 = the tooth surface covered with a distinct plaque layer.
Subsequently, all values were summed and divided by the total number of teeth and implants to record the modified plaque index score.
|
During the same session as the peri-implant fluid collection procedure
|
|
Peri-implant mucosal recession
Tidsram: During the same session as the peri-implant fluid collection procedure
|
The abutment-implant interface was designated as the reference point for determining the extent of peri-implant mucosal recession, and the distance between the reference point and the free gingival margin was measured using a periodontal probe.
Mucosal recession was recorded in four regions (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal, mid-lingual/palatal) for each implant included in the study.
The recession value for each implant was obtained by calculating the average of the four measured values.
|
During the same session as the peri-implant fluid collection procedure
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.
Sponsor
Samarbetspartners
Utredare
- Huvudutredare: Raziye Tugce Can Keles, R.A., Pamukkale University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology
- Studierektor: Gizem Torumtay Cin, Assoc. Prof., Pamukkale University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology
Studieavstämningsdatum
Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.
Studera stora datum
Studiestart (Faktisk)
6 mars 2025
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
6 september 2025
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
6 september 2025
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
3 maj 2026
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
7 maj 2026
Första postat (Faktisk)
13 maj 2026
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
13 maj 2026
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
7 maj 2026
Senast verifierad
1 maj 2026
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Nyckelord
Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- E-60116787-020-604271
- 2025DİŞF001 (Annan identifierare: Office of Scientific Research Projects of Pamukkale University)
Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)
Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?
NEJ
Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt
Nej
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt
Nej
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .