Measuring Quality of Medical Student Performance at Contextualizing Care
研究概览
详细说明
Clinical decision making requires two distinct skills: the ability to classify patients' conditions into diagnostic and management categories that permit the application of "best evidence" guidelines, and the ability to individualize or - more precisely - to contextualize care for patients whose circumstances and needs require variation from the standard approach to care. Most assessment in medical education places heavy emphasis on biomedical decision-making with little emphasis on how to incorporate contextual factors that may be essential to planning patients' care.
The goal of this project is to demonstrate and provide validity evidence for an innovative standardized patient (SP) method of assessing medical students in the clinical years on their ability to detect and respond to individual contextual factors in a patient encounter that overcomes the aforementioned challenges.
During the project, fourth-year medical students participating in a Medicine sub-internship will be randomized to an intervention group or a control group; the intervention group will receive additional training in the application of qualitative methodology to elicit and incorporate contextual factors in the clinical encounter. All students will participate in an SP assessment consisting of four SPs, blinded to trial arm, presenting cases with and without important biomedical and contextual factors in a counterbalanced factorial design. Performance will be compared between trial arms. In addition, performance will be compared with United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 2 clinical knowledge scores to determine whether contextualizing ability is independent of clinical knowledge, and consistency of performance across individual SP cases will be studied to determine the number of cases necessary to achieve sufficient reliability for the assessment to be used.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago、Illinois、美国、60612
- University of Illinois at Chicago
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fourth-year medical students at University of Illinois at Chicago
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
无干预:控制
无干预
|
|
|
实验性的:Contextualization workshop
A four-hour course on contextualization.
|
A four-hour course on contextualization.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Developing an Appropriate Treatment Plan (for Contextual Variant of Encounters)
大体时间:1 month
|
Probability that the learner writes a correct treatment plan for the standardized patient encounters undertaken at assessment at end of subinternship that include contextual red flags.
All learners are scheduled to see 4 encounters, based on combinations of four cases and four potential variants (baseline, biomedical, contextual, biocontextual) with counterbalancing by study month; each has a single contextual variant encounter.
Treatment plans are assessed by an investigator blinded to the learner's assignment to intervention or control group.
|
1 month
|
|
Probing for Contextual Issues
大体时间:1 month
|
Probability that the learner probes contextual red flags raised in standardized patient encounters undertaken at assessment at end of subinternship.
Each learner undertakes four encounters, each of which presents a contextual red flag that may or may not be probed; in a small number of cases, the standardized patient was ill and the learner undertook fewer than four encounters as a result.
Assessment of probing is made by an investigator blinded to learner's assignment to group.
|
1 month
|
|
Probing for Biomedical Issues
大体时间:1 month
|
Probability that the learner probes biomedical red flags raised in standardized patient encounters undertaken at assessment at end of subinternship.
Each learner undertakes four encounters, each of which presents a biomedical red flag that may or may not be probed; in a small number of cases, the standardized patient was ill and the learner undertook fewer than four encounters as a result.
Assessment of probing is made by an investigator blinded to learner's assignment to group.
|
1 month
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Alan Schwartz, PhD、University of Illinois at Chicago
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (估计)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (估计)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.