Cough Reflex Sensitivity and Bronchial Hyper-responsiveness
2017年2月16日 更新者：Kenneth R. DeVault, M.D.、Mayo Clinic
Pilot Studies Evaluating Cough Reflex Sensitivity and Bronchial Hyper-responsiveness: The Road to Cough and Wheeze in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux.
The aim of this study is to provide pilot data on the possible gastrointestinal predictors of respiratory hyper-responsiveness and how these relate to the clinical sub-types of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and visceral acid hypersensitivity.
研究概览
地位
完全的
详细说明
This study recruited participants into three groups: reflux patients with non-erosive disease (NERD) with abnormal levels of acid reflux, NERD patients with normal levels of reflux and healthy volunteers.
Participants were assessed for cough reflex sensitivity (CRS) to citric acid and bronchial-hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine challenge, both before (baseline) and after esophageal acid infusion (HCl, 0.15M) or normal saline control (8ml/min).
The order of CRS and BHR was randomized, as was the order of the acid/saline infusions.
研究类型
观察性的
注册 (实际的)
24
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville、Florida、美国、32224
- Mayo Clinic Florida
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 至 60年 (成人)
接受健康志愿者
是的
有资格学习的性别
全部
取样方法
概率样本
研究人群
This study will recruit participants into three groups ages 18-60 years: 12 reflux patients with non-erosive disease (NERD) with abnormal levels of acid reflux, 12 NERD patients with normal levels of reflux and 12 healthy volunteers.
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- symptomatic reflux (i.e., one symptom at least one day a week, with at least 'moderate' severity)
- no evidence of esophagitis
- non-smokers
Exclusion Criteria:
- previous gastrointestinal surgery (excluding minor surgeries, such as cholecystectomy, appendectomy
- active peptic ulcer disease
- Zollinger Ellison Syndrome
- Barrett's esophagus
- eosinophilic esophagitis
- cardiac disease
- diabetes or neurological deficit
- use of tricyclics
- selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
- narcotics or benzodiazepines
- current use of medications that may affect symptoms of perception,lower esophageal sphincter basal pressure, acid clearance time or acid suppression
- antibiotics within 60 days
- Nursing mothers will be excluded
- allergies to citrus
- asthma
- chronic lung disease
- heart attack or stroke within the last three months
- hypersensitivity to methacholine products
- know aortic aneurysm
- uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic pressure greater than 200 or diastolic greater than 100)
- reduced pulmonary function test (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) or the FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio (FEV1/FVC) of less that 70% of predicted value)
- None of the controls will have any GERD symptoms or ever used antireflux treatment.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
Healthy Volunteers
Subjects in this arm were healthy volunteers.
Subjects underwent both Cough Reflex Sensitivity and the Methacholine Challenge procedures.
|
Subjects inhaled increasing concentrations of citric acid, which induces coughing in a dose-dependent, reproducible matter.
Following each inhalation, the number of coughs in the subsequent 15 seconds was counted and recorded.
The challenge was terminated once the citric acid induced 5 or more coughs and the logarithmic (base 10) concentration provoking 5 coughs was recorded.
A baseline spirometry was used to assess how well the participant's lungs work by measuring how much air was inhale, how much was exhale and how quickly the participant exhaled.
If this was normal, the subject inhaled slowly and deeply the methacholine test solution from a nebulizer and was told to hold their breath for 5 seconds.
This was repeated until 5 inhalations were performed in no more than two minutes.
|
|
Non-erosive reflux disease with reflux
Subjects enrolled in this arm had non-erosive reflux disease with reflux (heartburn) for at least 6 of the preceding 12 months.
Subjects underwent both Cough Reflex Sensitivity and the Methacholine Challenge procedures.
|
Subjects inhaled increasing concentrations of citric acid, which induces coughing in a dose-dependent, reproducible matter.
Following each inhalation, the number of coughs in the subsequent 15 seconds was counted and recorded.
The challenge was terminated once the citric acid induced 5 or more coughs and the logarithmic (base 10) concentration provoking 5 coughs was recorded.
A baseline spirometry was used to assess how well the participant's lungs work by measuring how much air was inhale, how much was exhale and how quickly the participant exhaled.
If this was normal, the subject inhaled slowly and deeply the methacholine test solution from a nebulizer and was told to hold their breath for 5 seconds.
This was repeated until 5 inhalations were performed in no more than two minutes.
|
|
Non-erosive reflux disease without reflux
Subjects enrolled in this arm had non-erosive reflux disease with normal levels of reflux (heartburn).
Subjects underwent both Cough Reflex Sensitivity and the Methacholine Challenge procedures.
|
Subjects inhaled increasing concentrations of citric acid, which induces coughing in a dose-dependent, reproducible matter.
Following each inhalation, the number of coughs in the subsequent 15 seconds was counted and recorded.
The challenge was terminated once the citric acid induced 5 or more coughs and the logarithmic (base 10) concentration provoking 5 coughs was recorded.
A baseline spirometry was used to assess how well the participant's lungs work by measuring how much air was inhale, how much was exhale and how quickly the participant exhaled.
If this was normal, the subject inhaled slowly and deeply the methacholine test solution from a nebulizer and was told to hold their breath for 5 seconds.
This was repeated until 5 inhalations were performed in no more than two minutes.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|
|
Change in cough reflex sensitivity (CRS)
大体时间：baseline, approximately 4 weeks
|
baseline, approximately 4 weeks
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2012年12月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2016年2月1日
研究完成 (实际的)
2016年2月1日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2013年1月24日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2013年1月24日
首次发布 (估计)
2013年1月29日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2017年2月17日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2017年2月16日
最后验证
2017年2月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.