Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Chest Pain Choice Trial (CPC)
2017年11月10日 更新者：Erik P. Hess、Mayo Clinic
Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: The Chest Pain Choice Trial
Our long-term goal is to promote evidence-based patient-centered evaluation in the acute setting to more closely tailor testing to disease risk. To compare the use of risk stratification tools with usual clinical approaches to treatment selection or administration, we propose the following:
Test if Chest Pain Choice safely improves validated patient-centered outcome measures in a pragmatic parallel patient randomized trial.
Hypothesis: The intervention will significantly increase patient knowledge, engagement, and satisfaction with no increase in adverse events.
- Test if the decision aid has an effect on healthcare utilization within 30 days after enrollment.
Hypothesis: The intervention will significantly reduce the rate of hospital admission, rate of cardiac testing, and total healthcare utilization.
研究概览
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
898
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
California
-
Sacramento、California、美国、95817
- University of California, Davis
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville、Florida、美国、32224
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis、Indiana、美国、46202
- Indiana University Hospital: IU
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester、Minnesota、美国、55905
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia、Pennsylvania、美国、19107
- Thomas Jefferson University
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18+ years of age (at least 18).
- Admitted to emergency department for chest pain.
- Being considered by the treating clinician for admission for cardiac testing.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Ischemic changes on the electrocardiogram not known to be old as determined by the treating clinician in real time.
- Elevated cardiac troponin (cTn) above the 99th percentile reference limit.
- Known coronary artery disease as defined by consensus guidelines on risk stratification studies for emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndrome (≥ 50% stenosis on cardiac catheterization; prior electrocardiographic changes indicative of ischemia, e.g., ST-segment depression, T-wave inversion, or left bundle branch block; perfusion defects or wall motion abnormalities on previous exercise, pharmacological, or rest imaging studies; previous documentation of acute myocardial infarction; or, if no records are available, patient self-report of coronary artery disease).
- Cocaine use within the previous 72 hours by clinician history.
- Pregnancy.
- Referral to the emergency department by a personal physician for admission.
- Patients who indicate that a hospital different than the site hospital is his or her "hospital of choice" in the event of a return emergency department visit.
- Patients undergoing medical clearance for a detox center or any involuntary court or magistrate order.
- Homelessness, out-of-town residence or other condition known to preclude follow-up.
- Patients in police custody or currently incarcerated individuals.
- Patients who have, in their clinician's best judgment, major communication barriers such as visual or hearing impairment or dementia that would compromise their ability to give written informed consent (or use the decision aid).
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：卫生服务研究
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：双倍的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器：Chest Pain Choice Decision Aid
Patients randomized to the decision aid arm.
|
The clinician will review the decision aid with the patient.
The decision aid will be used as a tool to facilitate discussion and educate the patient regarding the rationale for their evaluation up to that point in the emergency department visit and their individual risk for a heart attack or pre-heart attack.
The clinician will provide the patient with management options consistent with both the patient's values and preferences and the clinician's level of comfort.
其他名称：
|
|
无干预：Usual Care
Patients randomized to the usual care arm (no decision aid used)
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Test if Chest Pain Choice Safely Improves Patient Knowledge.
大体时间：Directly following intervention (on day 1)
|
Patient knowledge was measured by immediate post-visit survey that included 8 questions about the patient's risk for acute coronary syndrome and the available management options.
|
Directly following intervention (on day 1)
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Test if the Decision Aid Has an Effect on Healthcare Utilization Within 30 Days After Enrollment.
大体时间：Within 30 days of study enrollment
|
We will measure the effect of the decision aid on the frequency of hospital admission and cardiac testing within 30 days of enrollment.
|
Within 30 days of study enrollment
|
|
Test if the Decision Aid Safely Improves Patient Engagement.
大体时间：Immediately after the intervention (on day 1)
|
1) Patient engagement in the decision-making process as measured by the OPTION scale.
The OPTION scale is composed of 12 items with a value of 0-4; they are summed, divided by 48, and then multiplied by 100.
Scores range from 0-100, where higher scores are reflective of higher levels of patient engagement.
|
Immediately after the intervention (on day 1)
|
|
Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
大体时间：within 30 days of enrollment
|
A MACE was defined as acute myocardial infarction, death due to a cardiac or unknown cause, emergency revascularization, ventricular arrhythmia, or cardiogenic shock.
|
within 30 days of enrollment
|
|
Total Testing Within 45 Days (a Component of Healthcare Utilization)
大体时间：45 days
|
In addition to measuring the effect of the decision aid on the frequency of hospital admission and cardiac testing within 30 days, we measured the total number of tests of any type within 45 days.
Although we pre-specified 30-day healthcare utilization, on further discussion among the investigative team the consensus was that we collected utilization data out to 45 days and reporting testing utilization at 45 days will provide more robust results.
|
45 days
|
|
Decisional Conflict
大体时间：Immediately after the visit (day 1)
|
Decisional conflict, which represents the degree of uncertainty patients experience related to feeling uninformed about the management options, is measured by the decisional conflict scale.
The decisional conflict scale includes 16 items that are scored from 0-4; the items are summed, divided by 16, and then multiplied by 25.
The scale is from 0-100, where higher scores are reflective of increased patient uncertainty about the choice.
|
Immediately after the visit (day 1)
|
|
Physician Trust
大体时间：Immediately after the visit (day 1)
|
The trust in physician scale consists of 9 items scored from 1-5; the items are subtracted by 1, summed, divided by 9, and then multiplied by 25.
The scale ranges from 0-100, where higher values are reflective of higher levels of patient trust in their physician.
|
Immediately after the visit (day 1)
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
赞助
合作者
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Erik Hess, MD, MSc、Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
一般刊物
- Hess EP, Hollander JE, Schaffer JT, Kline JA, Torres CA, Diercks DB, Jones R, Owen KP, Meisel ZF, Demers M, Leblanc A, Shah ND, Inselman J, Herrin J, Castaneda-Guarderas A, Montori VM. Shared decision making in patients with low risk chest pain: prospective randomized pragmatic trial. BMJ. 2016 Dec 5;355:i6165. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6165.
- Anderson RT, Montori VM, Shah ND, Ting HH, Pencille LJ, Demers M, Kline JA, Diercks DB, Hollander JE, Torres CA, Schaffer JT, Herrin J, Branda M, Leblanc A, Hess EP. Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials. 2014 May 10;15:166. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-166.
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始
2013年10月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2015年8月1日
研究完成 (实际的)
2015年12月1日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2013年10月17日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2013年10月21日
首次发布 (估计)
2013年10月25日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2018年8月6日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2017年11月10日
最后验证
2017年11月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- 13-001359
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
是的
IPD 计划说明
A link to the pre-test probability web tool and the Chest Pain Choice decision aid (DA) can be accessed at the Mayo Clinic Shared Decision Making National Resource Center at http://shareddecisions.mayoclinic.org/decision-aid-information/chest-pain-choice-decision-aid/.
De-identified patient level data and statistical code can be requested from the corresponding author at hess.erik@mayo.edu and provided to investigators who agree to adhere to a signed research data use agreement with the Mayo Clinic after 12/31/2017.
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.