Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Chest Pain Choice Trial (CPC)
2017年11月10日 更新者：Erik P. Hess、Mayo Clinic
Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: The Chest Pain Choice Trial
Our long-term goal is to promote evidence-based patient-centered evaluation in the acute setting to more closely tailor testing to disease risk. To compare the use of risk stratification tools with usual clinical approaches to treatment selection or administration, we propose the following:
Test if Chest Pain Choice safely improves validated patient-centered outcome measures in a pragmatic parallel patient randomized trial.
Hypothesis: The intervention will significantly increase patient knowledge, engagement, and satisfaction with no increase in adverse events.
- Test if the decision aid has an effect on healthcare utilization within 30 days after enrollment.
Hypothesis: The intervention will significantly reduce the rate of hospital admission, rate of cardiac testing, and total healthcare utilization.
調査の概要
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
898
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
California
-
Sacramento、California、アメリカ、95817
- University of California, Davis
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville、Florida、アメリカ、32224
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis、Indiana、アメリカ、46202
- Indiana University Hospital: IU
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester、Minnesota、アメリカ、55905
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia、Pennsylvania、アメリカ、19107
- Thomas Jefferson University
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
18年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
受講資格のある性別
全て
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18+ years of age (at least 18).
- Admitted to emergency department for chest pain.
- Being considered by the treating clinician for admission for cardiac testing.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Ischemic changes on the electrocardiogram not known to be old as determined by the treating clinician in real time.
- Elevated cardiac troponin (cTn) above the 99th percentile reference limit.
- Known coronary artery disease as defined by consensus guidelines on risk stratification studies for emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndrome (≥ 50% stenosis on cardiac catheterization; prior electrocardiographic changes indicative of ischemia, e.g., ST-segment depression, T-wave inversion, or left bundle branch block; perfusion defects or wall motion abnormalities on previous exercise, pharmacological, or rest imaging studies; previous documentation of acute myocardial infarction; or, if no records are available, patient self-report of coronary artery disease).
- Cocaine use within the previous 72 hours by clinician history.
- Pregnancy.
- Referral to the emergency department by a personal physician for admission.
- Patients who indicate that a hospital different than the site hospital is his or her "hospital of choice" in the event of a return emergency department visit.
- Patients undergoing medical clearance for a detox center or any involuntary court or magistrate order.
- Homelessness, out-of-town residence or other condition known to preclude follow-up.
- Patients in police custody or currently incarcerated individuals.
- Patients who have, in their clinician's best judgment, major communication barriers such as visual or hearing impairment or dementia that would compromise their ability to give written informed consent (or use the decision aid).
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：ダブル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Chest Pain Choice Decision Aid
Patients randomized to the decision aid arm.
|
The clinician will review the decision aid with the patient.
The decision aid will be used as a tool to facilitate discussion and educate the patient regarding the rationale for their evaluation up to that point in the emergency department visit and their individual risk for a heart attack or pre-heart attack.
The clinician will provide the patient with management options consistent with both the patient's values and preferences and the clinician's level of comfort.
他の名前：
|
|
介入なし：Usual Care
Patients randomized to the usual care arm (no decision aid used)
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Test if Chest Pain Choice Safely Improves Patient Knowledge.
時間枠：Directly following intervention (on day 1)
|
Patient knowledge was measured by immediate post-visit survey that included 8 questions about the patient's risk for acute coronary syndrome and the available management options.
|
Directly following intervention (on day 1)
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Test if the Decision Aid Has an Effect on Healthcare Utilization Within 30 Days After Enrollment.
時間枠：Within 30 days of study enrollment
|
We will measure the effect of the decision aid on the frequency of hospital admission and cardiac testing within 30 days of enrollment.
|
Within 30 days of study enrollment
|
|
Test if the Decision Aid Safely Improves Patient Engagement.
時間枠：Immediately after the intervention (on day 1)
|
1) Patient engagement in the decision-making process as measured by the OPTION scale.
The OPTION scale is composed of 12 items with a value of 0-4; they are summed, divided by 48, and then multiplied by 100.
Scores range from 0-100, where higher scores are reflective of higher levels of patient engagement.
|
Immediately after the intervention (on day 1)
|
|
Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
時間枠：within 30 days of enrollment
|
A MACE was defined as acute myocardial infarction, death due to a cardiac or unknown cause, emergency revascularization, ventricular arrhythmia, or cardiogenic shock.
|
within 30 days of enrollment
|
|
Total Testing Within 45 Days (a Component of Healthcare Utilization)
時間枠：45 days
|
In addition to measuring the effect of the decision aid on the frequency of hospital admission and cardiac testing within 30 days, we measured the total number of tests of any type within 45 days.
Although we pre-specified 30-day healthcare utilization, on further discussion among the investigative team the consensus was that we collected utilization data out to 45 days and reporting testing utilization at 45 days will provide more robust results.
|
45 days
|
|
Decisional Conflict
時間枠：Immediately after the visit (day 1)
|
Decisional conflict, which represents the degree of uncertainty patients experience related to feeling uninformed about the management options, is measured by the decisional conflict scale.
The decisional conflict scale includes 16 items that are scored from 0-4; the items are summed, divided by 16, and then multiplied by 25.
The scale is from 0-100, where higher scores are reflective of increased patient uncertainty about the choice.
|
Immediately after the visit (day 1)
|
|
Physician Trust
時間枠：Immediately after the visit (day 1)
|
The trust in physician scale consists of 9 items scored from 1-5; the items are subtracted by 1, summed, divided by 9, and then multiplied by 25.
The scale ranges from 0-100, where higher values are reflective of higher levels of patient trust in their physician.
|
Immediately after the visit (day 1)
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
スポンサー
協力者
捜査官
- 主任研究者：Erik Hess, MD, MSc、Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
一般刊行物
- Hess EP, Hollander JE, Schaffer JT, Kline JA, Torres CA, Diercks DB, Jones R, Owen KP, Meisel ZF, Demers M, Leblanc A, Shah ND, Inselman J, Herrin J, Castaneda-Guarderas A, Montori VM. Shared decision making in patients with low risk chest pain: prospective randomized pragmatic trial. BMJ. 2016 Dec 5;355:i6165. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6165.
- Anderson RT, Montori VM, Shah ND, Ting HH, Pencille LJ, Demers M, Kline JA, Diercks DB, Hollander JE, Torres CA, Schaffer JT, Herrin J, Branda M, Leblanc A, Hess EP. Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials. 2014 May 10;15:166. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-166.
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始
2013年10月1日
一次修了 (実際)
2015年8月1日
研究の完了 (実際)
2015年12月1日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2013年10月17日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2013年10月21日
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
2013年10月25日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2018年8月6日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2017年11月10日
最終確認日
2017年11月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 13-001359
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
はい
IPD プランの説明
A link to the pre-test probability web tool and the Chest Pain Choice decision aid (DA) can be accessed at the Mayo Clinic Shared Decision Making National Resource Center at http://shareddecisions.mayoclinic.org/decision-aid-information/chest-pain-choice-decision-aid/.
De-identified patient level data and statistical code can be requested from the corresponding author at hess.erik@mayo.edu and provided to investigators who agree to adhere to a signed research data use agreement with the Mayo Clinic after 12/31/2017.
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。
胸痛の臨床試験
-
Dexa Medica Group完了