Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Influences on Cognitive Inhibition in Schizophrenia
研究概览
详细说明
A deficit in cognitive suppression is a trait of patients with schizophrenia. Cognitive suppression is the ability to control or suppress irrelevant information and to adopt relevant responses instead. This ability is a basic skill which is essential to maintain a normal well-adjusted life. We need to suppress distracting information in order to focus attention, to suppress irrelevant cues in order to retrieve particular memories, and to suppress habitual responses in order to make adaptive choices (Dillon & Pizzagalli, 2007). The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on information suppression in schizophrenic patients. This is a noninvasive technique of brain stimulation that induces prolonged functional changes in the cerebral cortex through the application of a weak direct current to the scalp (Nitsche & Paulus, 2001; Nitsche et al., 2003, 2004; Antal et al., 2004). The aim of this study is to test whether anodal and cathodal tDCS differentially modify performance on several cognitive tasks when applied to the left/right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).
Sixty patients will be divided into four groups: 1) 15 schizophrenic subjects in a tDCS treatment group; 2) 15 schizophrenic subjects in a sham tDCS group; 3) 15 healthy subjects in a tDCS treatment group; 4) 15 healthy subjects in a sham tDCS group. All participants will complete baseline tests including an n-back test, the Hayling test and metaphoric comprehension test. The schizophrenic subjects only, will complete a bank of cognitive tests as a baseline (MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). The first meeting for the schizophrenic subjects only will be used to determine the best stimulation area (right/left DLPFC) and type (anodal/ cathodal). Schizophrenic subjects in both the treatment and the control groups will undergo six treatment sessions in total. The cognitive tests will be given to all participants once again at the end of the study. In order to evaluate improvement between the pre-test and the post-test, differences in reaction times and error rate will be calculated for each participant.
This study is important for few reasons. First, this study focus on the difficulty of suppressing irrelevant information, executive function ability essential to leading a normal life. Special populations, and specifically people with schizophrenia, have difficulty suppressing irrelevant information, and a correlation has been noted between this characteristic and weak executive functioning capabilities. In this study we evaluate the potential of minimizing these difficulties through use of tDCS. This particular tool was chosen for the study because it is easy to use, non-invasive, and painless. Research has shown that tDCS stimulation of the DLPFC can improve performance in cognitive tasks, a result that has not been mirrored through use of medications. Second, in recognition of the heterogeneity of schizophrenic patients (substantiated by the fact that the success of other treatments varies from patient to patient), our study will perform tests to identify the preferred stimulation region, DLPFC left/right. The results will help determine more specifically if there is a degree of heterogeneity in terms of the region responsible for suppressing irrelevant information . Related to this, we will be able to assess the impact of stimulation, including whether or not stimulation benefits all schizophrenic patients or, alternatively, if there are unknown variables involved which determine the relative success of this treatment amongst individuals. In addition, we will be able to explore differences or correlations between healthy subjects' verbal abilities in relation to the various tests conducted, and assess the impact of these tests on healthy subjects' cognitive inhibition and working memory. Finally, this study is critical because if the treatment method proves to be successful, we would be able to extend this study to other populations that have difficulties with executive functioning, and in addition, to examine the effect of electrical stimulation on other cognitive abilities.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Ramat-Gan、以色列、52621
- The Chaim Sheba Medical Center
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- must be 18 years old or above.
- Clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
- must be with a stable mental status as demonstrated by a stable Positive and -Negative Symptom Score (PANSS) score over a period of 2 weeks.
- must have no medication changes in the 2 weeks prior to obtaining informed consent.
- must be able to give informed consent for the trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unwilling or unable, in the opinion of the Investigator, to comply with study instructions
- Pregnant or breast-feeding.
- current DSM-V substance or alcohol abuse.
- Concurrent delirium
- mental retardation
- drug-induced psychosis
- history of clinically significant brain trauma documented by CT or MRI.
- epilepsy or had seizures 6 months prior the beginning of the study
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:双倍的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
假比较器:假 tDCS
|
the sham tDCS group.
Neuropsychological testing and symptom ratings will be conducted at baseline and 4 weeks after the end of treatment
|
|
实验性的:bilateral Anodal-L/R Cathodal-R/L tDCS
bilateral Anodal-left and cathodal-right tDCS over DLPFC or bilateral Anodal-right and cathodal-left tDCS over DLPFC. Intervention: Device: transcranial direct current stimulation |
arm Participants will receive bilateral anodal-left cathodal-right tDCS or anodal-right cathodal-left tDCS over the DLPFC. The following parameters will be used: stimulation intensity of 2 milliAmps for 20 minutes (6 consecutive sessions ).
其他名称:
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Progression score on cognitive tasks
大体时间:two years
|
Improve performance in cognitive tasks in particular, higher scores on the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery in the post vs. before intervention tests.
|
two years
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Nira Mashal, Ph.D.、Bar-Ilan University
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (估计)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.