Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Influences on Cognitive Inhibition in Schizophrenia

25 avril 2018 mis à jour par: Nira Mashal, Bar-Ilan University, Israel
A deficit in cognitive suppression is a trait of patients with schizophrenia. Cognitive suppression is the ability to control or suppress irrelevant responses and to adopt relevant responses instead. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on information suppression in schizophrenic patients. This is a noninvasive technique of brain stimulation that induces prolonged functional changes in the cerebral cortex through the application of a weak direct current to the scalp (Nitsche & Paulus, 2001). The aim of this study is to test whether bilateral tDCS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) differentially modify performance on several cognitive tasks.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

A deficit in cognitive suppression is a trait of patients with schizophrenia. Cognitive suppression is the ability to control or suppress irrelevant information and to adopt relevant responses instead. This ability is a basic skill which is essential to maintain a normal well-adjusted life. We need to suppress distracting information in order to focus attention, to suppress irrelevant cues in order to retrieve particular memories, and to suppress habitual responses in order to make adaptive choices (Dillon & Pizzagalli, 2007). The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on information suppression in schizophrenic patients. This is a noninvasive technique of brain stimulation that induces prolonged functional changes in the cerebral cortex through the application of a weak direct current to the scalp (Nitsche & Paulus, 2001; Nitsche et al., 2003, 2004; Antal et al., 2004). The aim of this study is to test whether anodal and cathodal tDCS differentially modify performance on several cognitive tasks when applied to the left/right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).

Sixty patients will be divided into four groups: 1) 15 schizophrenic subjects in a tDCS treatment group; 2) 15 schizophrenic subjects in a sham tDCS group; 3) 15 healthy subjects in a tDCS treatment group; 4) 15 healthy subjects in a sham tDCS group. All participants will complete baseline tests including an n-back test, the Hayling test and metaphoric comprehension test. The schizophrenic subjects only, will complete a bank of cognitive tests as a baseline (MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). The first meeting for the schizophrenic subjects only will be used to determine the best stimulation area (right/left DLPFC) and type (anodal/ cathodal). Schizophrenic subjects in both the treatment and the control groups will undergo six treatment sessions in total. The cognitive tests will be given to all participants once again at the end of the study. In order to evaluate improvement between the pre-test and the post-test, differences in reaction times and error rate will be calculated for each participant.

This study is important for few reasons. First, this study focus on the difficulty of suppressing irrelevant information, executive function ability essential to leading a normal life. Special populations, and specifically people with schizophrenia, have difficulty suppressing irrelevant information, and a correlation has been noted between this characteristic and weak executive functioning capabilities. In this study we evaluate the potential of minimizing these difficulties through use of tDCS. This particular tool was chosen for the study because it is easy to use, non-invasive, and painless. Research has shown that tDCS stimulation of the DLPFC can improve performance in cognitive tasks, a result that has not been mirrored through use of medications. Second, in recognition of the heterogeneity of schizophrenic patients (substantiated by the fact that the success of other treatments varies from patient to patient), our study will perform tests to identify the preferred stimulation region, DLPFC left/right. The results will help determine more specifically if there is a degree of heterogeneity in terms of the region responsible for suppressing irrelevant information . Related to this, we will be able to assess the impact of stimulation, including whether or not stimulation benefits all schizophrenic patients or, alternatively, if there are unknown variables involved which determine the relative success of this treatment amongst individuals. In addition, we will be able to explore differences or correlations between healthy subjects' verbal abilities in relation to the various tests conducted, and assess the impact of these tests on healthy subjects' cognitive inhibition and working memory. Finally, this study is critical because if the treatment method proves to be successful, we would be able to extend this study to other populations that have difficulties with executive functioning, and in addition, to examine the effect of electrical stimulation on other cognitive abilities.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

30

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Ramat-Gan, Israël, 52621
        • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 55 ans (Adulte)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • must be 18 years old or above.
  • Clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
  • must be with a stable mental status as demonstrated by a stable Positive and -Negative Symptom Score (PANSS) score over a period of 2 weeks.
  • must have no medication changes in the 2 weeks prior to obtaining informed consent.
  • must be able to give informed consent for the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling or unable, in the opinion of the Investigator, to comply with study instructions
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • current DSM-V substance or alcohol abuse.
  • Concurrent delirium
  • mental retardation
  • drug-induced psychosis
  • history of clinically significant brain trauma documented by CT or MRI.
  • epilepsy or had seizures 6 months prior the beginning of the study

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur factice: TDCS factice
the sham tDCS group. Neuropsychological testing and symptom ratings will be conducted at baseline and 4 weeks after the end of treatment
Expérimental: bilateral Anodal-L/R Cathodal-R/L tDCS

bilateral Anodal-left and cathodal-right tDCS over DLPFC or bilateral Anodal-right and cathodal-left tDCS over DLPFC.

Intervention: Device: transcranial direct current stimulation

arm Participants will receive bilateral anodal-left cathodal-right tDCS or anodal-right cathodal-left tDCS over the DLPFC.

The following parameters will be used: stimulation intensity of 2 milliAmps for 20 minutes (6 consecutive sessions ).

Autres noms:
  • Active Comparator: sham tDCS

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Progression score on cognitive tasks
Délai: two years
Improve performance in cognitive tasks in particular, higher scores on the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery in the post vs. before intervention tests.
two years

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Collaborateurs

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Nira Mashal, Ph.D., Bar-Ilan University

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 janvier 2015

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

7 mars 2018

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

7 mars 2018

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

12 octobre 2013

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

28 octobre 2013

Première publication (Estimation)

29 octobre 2013

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

27 avril 2018

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

25 avril 2018

Dernière vérification

1 avril 2018

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • BARILAN-13-0116-MV-CTIL

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner