Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Influences on Cognitive Inhibition in Schizophrenia

25. April 2018 aktualisiert von: Nira Mashal, Bar-Ilan University, Israel
A deficit in cognitive suppression is a trait of patients with schizophrenia. Cognitive suppression is the ability to control or suppress irrelevant responses and to adopt relevant responses instead. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on information suppression in schizophrenic patients. This is a noninvasive technique of brain stimulation that induces prolonged functional changes in the cerebral cortex through the application of a weak direct current to the scalp (Nitsche & Paulus, 2001). The aim of this study is to test whether bilateral tDCS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) differentially modify performance on several cognitive tasks.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

A deficit in cognitive suppression is a trait of patients with schizophrenia. Cognitive suppression is the ability to control or suppress irrelevant information and to adopt relevant responses instead. This ability is a basic skill which is essential to maintain a normal well-adjusted life. We need to suppress distracting information in order to focus attention, to suppress irrelevant cues in order to retrieve particular memories, and to suppress habitual responses in order to make adaptive choices (Dillon & Pizzagalli, 2007). The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on information suppression in schizophrenic patients. This is a noninvasive technique of brain stimulation that induces prolonged functional changes in the cerebral cortex through the application of a weak direct current to the scalp (Nitsche & Paulus, 2001; Nitsche et al., 2003, 2004; Antal et al., 2004). The aim of this study is to test whether anodal and cathodal tDCS differentially modify performance on several cognitive tasks when applied to the left/right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).

Sixty patients will be divided into four groups: 1) 15 schizophrenic subjects in a tDCS treatment group; 2) 15 schizophrenic subjects in a sham tDCS group; 3) 15 healthy subjects in a tDCS treatment group; 4) 15 healthy subjects in a sham tDCS group. All participants will complete baseline tests including an n-back test, the Hayling test and metaphoric comprehension test. The schizophrenic subjects only, will complete a bank of cognitive tests as a baseline (MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). The first meeting for the schizophrenic subjects only will be used to determine the best stimulation area (right/left DLPFC) and type (anodal/ cathodal). Schizophrenic subjects in both the treatment and the control groups will undergo six treatment sessions in total. The cognitive tests will be given to all participants once again at the end of the study. In order to evaluate improvement between the pre-test and the post-test, differences in reaction times and error rate will be calculated for each participant.

This study is important for few reasons. First, this study focus on the difficulty of suppressing irrelevant information, executive function ability essential to leading a normal life. Special populations, and specifically people with schizophrenia, have difficulty suppressing irrelevant information, and a correlation has been noted between this characteristic and weak executive functioning capabilities. In this study we evaluate the potential of minimizing these difficulties through use of tDCS. This particular tool was chosen for the study because it is easy to use, non-invasive, and painless. Research has shown that tDCS stimulation of the DLPFC can improve performance in cognitive tasks, a result that has not been mirrored through use of medications. Second, in recognition of the heterogeneity of schizophrenic patients (substantiated by the fact that the success of other treatments varies from patient to patient), our study will perform tests to identify the preferred stimulation region, DLPFC left/right. The results will help determine more specifically if there is a degree of heterogeneity in terms of the region responsible for suppressing irrelevant information . Related to this, we will be able to assess the impact of stimulation, including whether or not stimulation benefits all schizophrenic patients or, alternatively, if there are unknown variables involved which determine the relative success of this treatment amongst individuals. In addition, we will be able to explore differences or correlations between healthy subjects' verbal abilities in relation to the various tests conducted, and assess the impact of these tests on healthy subjects' cognitive inhibition and working memory. Finally, this study is critical because if the treatment method proves to be successful, we would be able to extend this study to other populations that have difficulties with executive functioning, and in addition, to examine the effect of electrical stimulation on other cognitive abilities.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

30

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

      • Ramat-Gan, Israel, 52621
        • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 55 Jahre (Erwachsene)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • must be 18 years old or above.
  • Clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
  • must be with a stable mental status as demonstrated by a stable Positive and -Negative Symptom Score (PANSS) score over a period of 2 weeks.
  • must have no medication changes in the 2 weeks prior to obtaining informed consent.
  • must be able to give informed consent for the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling or unable, in the opinion of the Investigator, to comply with study instructions
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • current DSM-V substance or alcohol abuse.
  • Concurrent delirium
  • mental retardation
  • drug-induced psychosis
  • history of clinically significant brain trauma documented by CT or MRI.
  • epilepsy or had seizures 6 months prior the beginning of the study

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Doppelt

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Schein-Komparator: Schein-tDCS
the sham tDCS group. Neuropsychological testing and symptom ratings will be conducted at baseline and 4 weeks after the end of treatment
Experimental: bilateral Anodal-L/R Cathodal-R/L tDCS

bilateral Anodal-left and cathodal-right tDCS over DLPFC or bilateral Anodal-right and cathodal-left tDCS over DLPFC.

Intervention: Device: transcranial direct current stimulation

arm Participants will receive bilateral anodal-left cathodal-right tDCS or anodal-right cathodal-left tDCS over the DLPFC.

The following parameters will be used: stimulation intensity of 2 milliAmps for 20 minutes (6 consecutive sessions ).

Andere Namen:
  • Active Comparator: sham tDCS

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Progression score on cognitive tasks
Zeitfenster: two years
Improve performance in cognitive tasks in particular, higher scores on the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery in the post vs. before intervention tests.
two years

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Mitarbeiter

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Nira Mashal, Ph.D., Bar-Ilan University

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. Januar 2015

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

7. März 2018

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

7. März 2018

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

12. Oktober 2013

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

28. Oktober 2013

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

29. Oktober 2013

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

27. April 2018

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

25. April 2018

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. April 2018

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • BARILAN-13-0116-MV-CTIL

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur transcranial direct current stimulation

3
Abonnieren