Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Influences on Cognitive Inhibition in Schizophrenia

25 aprile 2018 aggiornato da: Nira Mashal, Bar-Ilan University, Israel
A deficit in cognitive suppression is a trait of patients with schizophrenia. Cognitive suppression is the ability to control or suppress irrelevant responses and to adopt relevant responses instead. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on information suppression in schizophrenic patients. This is a noninvasive technique of brain stimulation that induces prolonged functional changes in the cerebral cortex through the application of a weak direct current to the scalp (Nitsche & Paulus, 2001). The aim of this study is to test whether bilateral tDCS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) differentially modify performance on several cognitive tasks.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

A deficit in cognitive suppression is a trait of patients with schizophrenia. Cognitive suppression is the ability to control or suppress irrelevant information and to adopt relevant responses instead. This ability is a basic skill which is essential to maintain a normal well-adjusted life. We need to suppress distracting information in order to focus attention, to suppress irrelevant cues in order to retrieve particular memories, and to suppress habitual responses in order to make adaptive choices (Dillon & Pizzagalli, 2007). The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on information suppression in schizophrenic patients. This is a noninvasive technique of brain stimulation that induces prolonged functional changes in the cerebral cortex through the application of a weak direct current to the scalp (Nitsche & Paulus, 2001; Nitsche et al., 2003, 2004; Antal et al., 2004). The aim of this study is to test whether anodal and cathodal tDCS differentially modify performance on several cognitive tasks when applied to the left/right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).

Sixty patients will be divided into four groups: 1) 15 schizophrenic subjects in a tDCS treatment group; 2) 15 schizophrenic subjects in a sham tDCS group; 3) 15 healthy subjects in a tDCS treatment group; 4) 15 healthy subjects in a sham tDCS group. All participants will complete baseline tests including an n-back test, the Hayling test and metaphoric comprehension test. The schizophrenic subjects only, will complete a bank of cognitive tests as a baseline (MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). The first meeting for the schizophrenic subjects only will be used to determine the best stimulation area (right/left DLPFC) and type (anodal/ cathodal). Schizophrenic subjects in both the treatment and the control groups will undergo six treatment sessions in total. The cognitive tests will be given to all participants once again at the end of the study. In order to evaluate improvement between the pre-test and the post-test, differences in reaction times and error rate will be calculated for each participant.

This study is important for few reasons. First, this study focus on the difficulty of suppressing irrelevant information, executive function ability essential to leading a normal life. Special populations, and specifically people with schizophrenia, have difficulty suppressing irrelevant information, and a correlation has been noted between this characteristic and weak executive functioning capabilities. In this study we evaluate the potential of minimizing these difficulties through use of tDCS. This particular tool was chosen for the study because it is easy to use, non-invasive, and painless. Research has shown that tDCS stimulation of the DLPFC can improve performance in cognitive tasks, a result that has not been mirrored through use of medications. Second, in recognition of the heterogeneity of schizophrenic patients (substantiated by the fact that the success of other treatments varies from patient to patient), our study will perform tests to identify the preferred stimulation region, DLPFC left/right. The results will help determine more specifically if there is a degree of heterogeneity in terms of the region responsible for suppressing irrelevant information . Related to this, we will be able to assess the impact of stimulation, including whether or not stimulation benefits all schizophrenic patients or, alternatively, if there are unknown variables involved which determine the relative success of this treatment amongst individuals. In addition, we will be able to explore differences or correlations between healthy subjects' verbal abilities in relation to the various tests conducted, and assess the impact of these tests on healthy subjects' cognitive inhibition and working memory. Finally, this study is critical because if the treatment method proves to be successful, we would be able to extend this study to other populations that have difficulties with executive functioning, and in addition, to examine the effect of electrical stimulation on other cognitive abilities.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

30

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

      • Ramat-Gan, Israele, 52621
        • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

Da 18 anni a 55 anni (Adulto)

Accetta volontari sani

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • must be 18 years old or above.
  • Clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
  • must be with a stable mental status as demonstrated by a stable Positive and -Negative Symptom Score (PANSS) score over a period of 2 weeks.
  • must have no medication changes in the 2 weeks prior to obtaining informed consent.
  • must be able to give informed consent for the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling or unable, in the opinion of the Investigator, to comply with study instructions
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • current DSM-V substance or alcohol abuse.
  • Concurrent delirium
  • mental retardation
  • drug-induced psychosis
  • history of clinically significant brain trauma documented by CT or MRI.
  • epilepsy or had seizures 6 months prior the beginning of the study

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Doppio

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Comparatore fittizio: Sham tDCS
the sham tDCS group. Neuropsychological testing and symptom ratings will be conducted at baseline and 4 weeks after the end of treatment
Sperimentale: bilateral Anodal-L/R Cathodal-R/L tDCS

bilateral Anodal-left and cathodal-right tDCS over DLPFC or bilateral Anodal-right and cathodal-left tDCS over DLPFC.

Intervention: Device: transcranial direct current stimulation

arm Participants will receive bilateral anodal-left cathodal-right tDCS or anodal-right cathodal-left tDCS over the DLPFC.

The following parameters will be used: stimulation intensity of 2 milliAmps for 20 minutes (6 consecutive sessions ).

Altri nomi:
  • Active Comparator: sham tDCS

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Progression score on cognitive tasks
Lasso di tempo: two years
Improve performance in cognitive tasks in particular, higher scores on the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery in the post vs. before intervention tests.
two years

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Collaboratori

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Nira Mashal, Ph.D., Bar-Ilan University

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio

1 gennaio 2015

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

7 marzo 2018

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

7 marzo 2018

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

12 ottobre 2013

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

28 ottobre 2013

Primo Inserito (Stima)

29 ottobre 2013

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

27 aprile 2018

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

25 aprile 2018

Ultimo verificato

1 aprile 2018

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • BARILAN-13-0116-MV-CTIL

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su transcranial direct current stimulation

Sottoscrivi