Evaluation of a New Design of Crowns in the Posterior Teeth
Evaluation of IPS E.Max-CAD Endocrown in Molars Compared to the Conventional Design
Background: no randomized controlled trial has tried to compare treatment outcomes between the IPS.emmax endocrowns and the IPS.emmax conventional crowns .
Objective: to investigate the clinical performance of the IPS.emmax endocrowns and the IPS.emmax conventional crowns Design and setting: Parallel-groups randomized controlled trial on patients with one or more intensive damaged molars requiring crowning and being treated at the University of Damascus, Dental School in Damascus, Syria .All molars will be examined at the baseline assessment using a modified US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.
Participants: Incoming patients to the Fixed Prosthetic and Endodontic Departments will be examined to find any excessively damaged molars requiring crowning. Forty patients will be recruited according to specific inclusion criteria. Randomization will be performed using computer-generated tables; allocation will be concealed using sequentially numbered opaque and sealed envelopes.The included 40 patients will be analyzed (age range between 20-60 years). They will be randomly distributed into two groups with 20 patients in each group (1:1 allocation ratio).
Intervention: Excessively damaged and endodontically treated molars will be restored with IPS.emmax endocrowns or IPS.emmax crowns supported with composite core.
Main outcome measure: marginal adaptation and anatomic form will be investigated clinically and by apical radiographs at the baseline assessment using the modified (USPHS) at six assessment times during an 18-month observation period.
Assessor blinding will be employed.
研究概览
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Damascus、阿拉伯叙利亚共和国、DM20AM18
- Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Damsacus
-
Damascus、阿拉伯叙利亚共和国、DM20AM18
- University of Damascus Dental School
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients between 20 to 60 years old
- Good oral hygiene
- Gingival index (GI) equal 0
- Plaque index (PI) equal 0 or 1
- Primary acceptation and commitment to the trail
Inclusion criteria of molars:
- Two remaining axial walls at least.
- 0.5 mm above the gingival line at least for damaged axial walls.
- Good endodontic treatment and apical seal
- First and second upper and lower molars only.
- Against teeth could be natural or crowned.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with an open bite or cross bite.
- Bruxism
- Periodontitis
- Gingival hyperplasia
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：三倍
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
无干预：IPS.emmax crown
|
|
|
实验性的：IPS.emmax endocrown
Patients with excessively undermined and endodontically treated molars will receive the IPS.emmax endocrown as the restoration of choice.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Marginal Adaptation
大体时间：at 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 15 months (T5), and 18 months (T6) following application
|
The presence of marginal adaptation means that the restoration margins cannot be distinguished, the probe cannot find a step between the margins and the surrounding tissue, and no discoloration visible.
|
at 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 15 months (T5), and 18 months (T6) following application
|
|
Change in the Anatomic Form
大体时间：at 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 15 months (T5), and 18 months (T6) following application
|
The anatomic form is considered satisfactory when the crown has a correct contour with tight proximal contact, no worn facets on restorations and no worn facets on opposing teeth.
|
at 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 15 months (T5), and 18 months (T6) following application
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Retention Status
大体时间：at 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 15 months (T5), and 18 months (T6) following application
|
Retention loss is considered when the crown becomes loose or mobile.
|
at 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), 12 months (T4), 15 months (T5), and 18 months (T6) following application
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Rana Dallool, DDS、University of Damascus Dental School
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- Bernhart J, Brauning A, Altenburger MJ, Wrbas KT. Cerec3D endocrowns--two-year clinical examination of CAD/CAM crowns for restoring endodontically treated molars. Int J Comput Dent. 2010;13(2):141-54. English, German.
- Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent. 2012 Mar-Apr;37(2):130-6. doi: 10.2341/11-105-L. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
- Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years--preliminary results. J Adhes Dent. 1999 Autumn;1(3):255-65.
- Fischer H, Marx R. Fracture toughness of dental ceramics: comparison of bending and indentation method. Dent Mater. 2002 Jan;18(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00005-7.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (估计)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (估计)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- UDDS-FixPro-01-2014
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.