此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

iPad as a Distraction Tool During Facial Laceration Repair

2019年7月3日 更新者：Amy Williams、University of California, San Diego
Children aged 2-12 presenting to the Rady Children's Hospital San Diego (RCHSD) emergency department with facial lacerations requiring suture repair will be eligible to participate in the study. Participating children will be randomized to standard care versus standard care plus iPad use during the procedure. Children's anxiety levels assessed using a validated scale will be measured from video recordings made of the procedure. Parent and provider satisfaction surveys will be completed following the procedure. The primary study aim is to determine how iPad use affects children's anxiety levels during facial laceration repair. The secondary study aim is to determine how iPad use affects parent and provider satisfaction regarding a child's facial laceration repair. Hypothesis is that iPad use decreases children's anxiety levels during facial laceration repair and increases parent and provider satisfaction regarding a child's facial laceration repair.

研究概览

地位

完全的

条件

干预/治疗

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

80

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

  • 美国
    • California
      • San Diego、California、美国、92123
        • Rady Children's Hospital San Diego

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

2年 至 12年 (孩子)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients: Male and female children aged 2-12 of all ethnic backgrounds and socioeconomic levels presenting to the emergency department for laceration repair. Children sustaining single, uncomplicated facial lacerations, which can be repaired with basic suture techniques, are eligible for the study. Lacerations repaired using LET cream, lidocaine injection, and LET cream and lidocaine injection are all eligible for the study.
  2. Parents of enrolled patients.
  3. Providers of enrolled patients: Residents, fellows, attendings, and nurse practitioners serving as the primary provider performing the laceration repair.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients: Lacerations to parts of the body other than the face. Children with developmental disabilities. Children with laceration repair requiring sedation. Children with complex lacerations requiring subspecialty repair.
  2. Parents and/or providers of children not eligible or enrolled in the study.
  3. Providers: Medical students performing the laceration repair.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 主要用途：支持治疗
  • 分配：随机化
  • 介入模型：并行分配
  • 屏蔽：无（打开标签）

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的：iPad
iPad with age-appropriate applications, videos, and music
设备：iPad
iPad with age-appropriate applications, videos, and music
其他：Standard Care
All study participants will receive standard care, which consists of procedural explanation and preparation by providers, verbal encouragement and comforting by providers and parents, and topical anesthetic (LET) followed by injectable lidocaine administration (whether one or both of these anesthetics will be used will be determined by the provider prior to randomization).
有源比较器：Standard Care
All study participants will receive standard care, which consists of procedural explanation and preparation by providers, verbal encouragement and comforting by providers and parents, and topical anesthetic (LET) followed by injectable lidocaine administration (whether one or both of these anesthetics will be used will be determined by the provider prior to randomization).
其他：Standard Care
All study participants will receive standard care, which consists of procedural explanation and preparation by providers, verbal encouragement and comforting by providers and parents, and topical anesthetic (LET) followed by injectable lidocaine administration (whether one or both of these anesthetics will be used will be determined by the provider prior to randomization).

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Observational Score Behavioral Distress Revised (OSBD-R)
大体时间：Entire laceration repair procedure
Weighted average Observational Score Behavioral Distress Revised (OSBD-R) scored from videotapes of the entire laceration repair procedure Scale 0-23.5 (0 low/better, 23.5 high/worse)
Entire laceration repair procedure

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Parent Survey
大体时间：Survey administered immediately following the laceration repair
Parent rating of own anxiety during the procedure Likert-based scale 1-5 (1 low/better, 5 high/worse)
Survey administered immediately following the laceration repair

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

University of California, San Diego

调查人员

  • 首席研究员：Bema Bonsu, MD、University of California, San Diego and Rady Children's Hospital San Diego
  • 首席研究员：Amy Williams, MD、University of California, San Diego and Rady Children's Hospital San Diego

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2014年4月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2015年7月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2015年7月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2014年8月8日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2014年8月14日

首次发布 (估计)

2014年8月15日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2019年7月23日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2019年7月3日

最后验证

2019年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • iPadWilliams

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅