此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Understanding the Value of Community Vital Signs in Primary Care

2018年2月26日 更新者:Virginia Commonwealth University
Social determinants of health (e.g. the income, education, and environment of patients) may exert greater influence on health outcomes than traditional clinical factors (e.g. lab results, diagnoses, and family history). Calls for integrating primary care and public health are therefore increasing, but merging these domains of care is logistically difficult. Research is lacking on the incremental benefit of adding public health data at the practice level-- in improving either health outcomes or care delivery. This proof of concept pilot will merge data from electronic health records (EHRs) with community vital signs, a set of metrics that describes key community resources that affect health. The investigators will identify resource poor communities, or cold spots, based on four variables (education, poverty, life expectancy, and access to healthy foods) at the census tract level - referred to as a community vital sign. The hypothesis is that patients coming from cold spots are more likely to have worse health outcomes and that clinicians will deliver better care if they know a patient's community context and his/her specific social needs. This study will involve 12 primary care practices in Northern Virginia that care for more than 170,000 patients. Patient addresses will be geocoded for each practice and determine which patients reside in cold spots for each community vital sign. The variation for each community vital sign for each practice's patients will be calculated and a bivariate and regression analyses will be used to determine whether coming from a cold spot is associated with worse clinical quality metrics. 15 clinicians will be alerted when they see a patient from a cold spot, patients will complete a social needs survey, and clinicians will prospectively document through surveys whether such knowledge affects interpersonal interactions (such as time spent with patients and the use of clearer language) or clinical management (such as referrals to care coordination or community resources). By pragmatically integrating community vital signs into care, this innovative proposal will seek to understand which community data clinicians value, how these data might influence care, and how best to incorporate these data into clinical and population care.

研究概览

详细说明

The investigators will integrate community vital signs into clinical data, identify cold spots, and determine prospectively how clinicians use these community data at the point of care and for populations of patients. The investigators hypothesize that (1) the patients in a primary care practice live in a range of communities with different social determinants of health, including cold spots that lack health-promoting resources, (2) community vital signs are associated with patient health outcomes (e.g., being up-to-date with preventive care, control of chronic conditions, morbidity), and (3) knowing that a patient resides in a cold spot will help clinicians improve patient care.

Aim 1a: Determine community vital sign cold spots in the catchment area of 12 primary care practices.

Aim 1b: Determine whether patients residing in cold spots experience worse outcomes, such as receiving inadequate care, worse chronic disease control, or higher morbidity.

Aim 2: Determine whether knowing a patient's community vital signs and social needs at the point of care will change clinical management; and explore how practices could use community vital signs for population care.

Aim 3: Identify other community vital signs that practices would find useful for managing patients.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

120

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Virginia
      • Fairfax、Virginia、美国、22033
        • Fairfax Family Practice Centers
      • Richmond、Virginia、美国、23298
        • Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 99年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

是的

有资格学习的性别

全部

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

Aims 1a and 1b: The participants include all unique patients seen at the 12 study practices (approximately 170,000 patients over the past two years). Aims 2 and 3: The clinicians in this analysis will include 15 participants recruited from the approximately 100 clinicians at the 12 practices - ideally 1-2 clinicians from each office. Because the study will characterize the upper bounds, or ideal outcomes, in the use of community vital signs, clinicians who are willing to participate and provide feedback will be selectively recruited.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aims 1a and 1b: Patients seen at one of the 12 study practices
  • Aims 2 and 3: Clinicians at one of the 12 study practices

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aims 1a and 1b: Patients outside of the age range
  • Aims 2 and 3: Clinicians involved with the design of the research protocol.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
Clinic patients
Aims 1a and 1b: The participants include all unique patients seen at the 12 study practices (approximately 170,000 patients over the past two years).
Clinicians
Aims 2 and 3: The clinicians in this analysis will include 15 participants recruited from the approximately 100 clinicians at the 12 practices
We will present clinicians with information about their patients' communities

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Quality of care
大体时间:The past 5 years
Likelihood patient living in a cold spot received recommended cancer screening and cardiovascular preventive care based on National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) quality measures.
The past 5 years

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
ACG morbidity risk score
大体时间:Past 5 years
Likelihood a patient living in a cold spot has a higher Adjusted Clinical Group (ACG) risk score than patient not living in a cold spot.
Past 5 years
Change in care
大体时间:Up to one year
Physician report on whether they change care in response to knowing a patient lives in a cold spot.
Up to one year

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Alex Krist, M.D.、Virginia Commonwealth University

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2015年10月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2016年11月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2016年11月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2015年6月11日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2015年7月29日

首次发布 (估计)

2015年7月31日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2018年2月28日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2018年2月26日

最后验证

2018年2月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • HM20004050

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅