Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Understanding the Value of Community Vital Signs in Primary Care

26 februari 2018 bijgewerkt door: Virginia Commonwealth University
Social determinants of health (e.g. the income, education, and environment of patients) may exert greater influence on health outcomes than traditional clinical factors (e.g. lab results, diagnoses, and family history). Calls for integrating primary care and public health are therefore increasing, but merging these domains of care is logistically difficult. Research is lacking on the incremental benefit of adding public health data at the practice level-- in improving either health outcomes or care delivery. This proof of concept pilot will merge data from electronic health records (EHRs) with community vital signs, a set of metrics that describes key community resources that affect health. The investigators will identify resource poor communities, or cold spots, based on four variables (education, poverty, life expectancy, and access to healthy foods) at the census tract level - referred to as a community vital sign. The hypothesis is that patients coming from cold spots are more likely to have worse health outcomes and that clinicians will deliver better care if they know a patient's community context and his/her specific social needs. This study will involve 12 primary care practices in Northern Virginia that care for more than 170,000 patients. Patient addresses will be geocoded for each practice and determine which patients reside in cold spots for each community vital sign. The variation for each community vital sign for each practice's patients will be calculated and a bivariate and regression analyses will be used to determine whether coming from a cold spot is associated with worse clinical quality metrics. 15 clinicians will be alerted when they see a patient from a cold spot, patients will complete a social needs survey, and clinicians will prospectively document through surveys whether such knowledge affects interpersonal interactions (such as time spent with patients and the use of clearer language) or clinical management (such as referrals to care coordination or community resources). By pragmatically integrating community vital signs into care, this innovative proposal will seek to understand which community data clinicians value, how these data might influence care, and how best to incorporate these data into clinical and population care.

Studie Overzicht

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

The investigators will integrate community vital signs into clinical data, identify cold spots, and determine prospectively how clinicians use these community data at the point of care and for populations of patients. The investigators hypothesize that (1) the patients in a primary care practice live in a range of communities with different social determinants of health, including cold spots that lack health-promoting resources, (2) community vital signs are associated with patient health outcomes (e.g., being up-to-date with preventive care, control of chronic conditions, morbidity), and (3) knowing that a patient resides in a cold spot will help clinicians improve patient care.

Aim 1a: Determine community vital sign cold spots in the catchment area of 12 primary care practices.

Aim 1b: Determine whether patients residing in cold spots experience worse outcomes, such as receiving inadequate care, worse chronic disease control, or higher morbidity.

Aim 2: Determine whether knowing a patient's community vital signs and social needs at the point of care will change clinical management; and explore how practices could use community vital signs for population care.

Aim 3: Identify other community vital signs that practices would find useful for managing patients.

Studietype

Observationeel

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

120

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, Verenigde Staten, 22033
        • Fairfax Family Practice Centers
      • Richmond, Virginia, Verenigde Staten, 23298
        • Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar tot 99 jaar (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Ja

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Bemonsteringsmethode

Niet-waarschijnlijkheidssteekproef

Studie Bevolking

Aims 1a and 1b: The participants include all unique patients seen at the 12 study practices (approximately 170,000 patients over the past two years). Aims 2 and 3: The clinicians in this analysis will include 15 participants recruited from the approximately 100 clinicians at the 12 practices - ideally 1-2 clinicians from each office. Because the study will characterize the upper bounds, or ideal outcomes, in the use of community vital signs, clinicians who are willing to participate and provide feedback will be selectively recruited.

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aims 1a and 1b: Patients seen at one of the 12 study practices
  • Aims 2 and 3: Clinicians at one of the 12 study practices

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aims 1a and 1b: Patients outside of the age range
  • Aims 2 and 3: Clinicians involved with the design of the research protocol.

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

Cohorten en interventies

Groep / Cohort
Interventie / Behandeling
Clinic patients
Aims 1a and 1b: The participants include all unique patients seen at the 12 study practices (approximately 170,000 patients over the past two years).
Clinicians
Aims 2 and 3: The clinicians in this analysis will include 15 participants recruited from the approximately 100 clinicians at the 12 practices
We will present clinicians with information about their patients' communities

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Quality of care
Tijdsspanne: The past 5 years
Likelihood patient living in a cold spot received recommended cancer screening and cardiovascular preventive care based on National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) quality measures.
The past 5 years

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
ACG morbidity risk score
Tijdsspanne: Past 5 years
Likelihood a patient living in a cold spot has a higher Adjusted Clinical Group (ACG) risk score than patient not living in a cold spot.
Past 5 years
Change in care
Tijdsspanne: Up to one year
Physician report on whether they change care in response to knowing a patient lives in a cold spot.
Up to one year

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Alex Krist, M.D., Virginia Commonwealth University

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start

1 oktober 2015

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 november 2016

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 november 2016

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

11 juni 2015

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

29 juli 2015

Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)

31 juli 2015

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

28 februari 2018

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

26 februari 2018

Laatst geverifieerd

1 februari 2018

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • HM20004050

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren