Positive Appraisal Improve Trust Between Patients and Therapists, and Change Treatment Effects
The trust between patients and medical providers is the cornerstone to obtain success treatment. To boost the trust can increase medical prescription compliance, enhance patient satisfaction, and improve the effectiveness of treatment. Otherwise, mistrust between medical providers and patients will result in ineffective treatment and excessive defensive health care. This situation may cause medical dispute and medical resources wasting problems.
Most of treatment complete in a few times of admissions and interventions. So, how to improve the trust between patients and doctors quickly became a more knotty problem. Several studies found that speech (including listening, showing compassion, and take longer to explain), reputation, clothing, offer a newer therapy were more important than age, title, and sex.
However, past researches were restricted to an unclear causal relationship. That is they can't be determined whether good doctor-patient relationship and better trust conditions create a longer visit time, better satisfaction, and good reputation, or vice versa. They also unable to clarify whether the high degree of trust result in improved treatment effects, or good relationship result from good medical outcomes.
Investigators want to design a randomized control trial by giving patients recommendation and physical therapist introductions to enhance the trust of patients to therapists. And this study may verify whether enhance trust between therapists and patients will lead to changes in treatment effectiveness.
研究概览
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Taoyuan、台湾、33004
- TaoYuan General Hospital
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- First time visit to Taoyuan general hospital rehabilitation ward at 2016/07/01~2017/12/31
- Diagnosis with L spine spondylosis, L spine Herniated Inter-vertebral Disc, or non-acute low back muscle strain
- Suitable for physical therapy with ( Hot packing + interference current therapy + pelvic traction + therapeutic exercise )
- most pain score >2
Exclusion Criteria:
- poor of follow oral order, or patients who can't understand Chinese, including patients with aphasia or dementia
- patient who can not received 4 weeks of physical therapy
- other cause of low back pain which can't treatment with physical therapy, including : (Urinary tract stones, infection, rapid progression disease which need immediately operation)
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:四人间
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器:intervention
|
intervention with recommendation and therapist introduction
low back pain education, and physical therapy 3 times per week
|
|
安慰剂比较:placebo
|
low back pain education, and physical therapy 3 times per week
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Trust score by The Chinese version of the WFPTS(C-WFPTS) between intervention group and placebo group
大体时间:The first time data collection for individual 5 mins after the intervention.
|
The first time data collection for individual 5 mins after the intervention.
|
|
|
Success treatment proportion between intervention group and placebo group 4 weeks after intervention
大体时间:data collection for individual at the 0 and 4th week after clinical visit
|
Success treatment is defined as the most pain score decrease from baseline more than 2 degree. ( Pain score change from baseline by Visual Analogue Scale after 4 weeks) |
data collection for individual at the 0 and 4th week after clinical visit
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Trust score by The Chinese version of the WFPTS(C-WFPTS) between intervention group and placebo group
大体时间:The second time and third time data collection after 2 weeks and 4 weeks after first clinical visit
|
The second time and third time data collection after 2 weeks and 4 weeks after first clinical visit
|
|
|
Change of pain score with The Chinese version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-C) between intervention group and placebo group
大体时间:data collection for individual at the0, 2nd and 4th week after clinical visit
|
Pain score change from baseline
|
data collection for individual at the0, 2nd and 4th week after clinical visit
|
|
Change of the compression force to trigger the tenderness point from baseline
大体时间:data collection for individual at the 0, 2nd and 4th week after clinical visit
|
The compression force was measured by IMADA digital force gauge (kgf) In each data collection point(0 , 2nd and 4th week) , we arrange 3 times test and use the average as the measure value.
|
data collection for individual at the 0, 2nd and 4th week after clinical visit
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Huan-Jui Yeh、Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (估计)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.