Positive Appraisal Improve Trust Between Patients and Therapists, and Change Treatment Effects

September 24, 2018 updated by: Taoyuan General Hospital

The trust between patients and medical providers is the cornerstone to obtain success treatment. To boost the trust can increase medical prescription compliance, enhance patient satisfaction, and improve the effectiveness of treatment. Otherwise, mistrust between medical providers and patients will result in ineffective treatment and excessive defensive health care. This situation may cause medical dispute and medical resources wasting problems.

Most of treatment complete in a few times of admissions and interventions. So, how to improve the trust between patients and doctors quickly became a more knotty problem. Several studies found that speech (including listening, showing compassion, and take longer to explain), reputation, clothing, offer a newer therapy were more important than age, title, and sex.

However, past researches were restricted to an unclear causal relationship. That is they can't be determined whether good doctor-patient relationship and better trust conditions create a longer visit time, better satisfaction, and good reputation, or vice versa. They also unable to clarify whether the high degree of trust result in improved treatment effects, or good relationship result from good medical outcomes.

Investigators want to design a randomized control trial by giving patients recommendation and physical therapist introductions to enhance the trust of patients to therapists. And this study may verify whether enhance trust between therapists and patients will lead to changes in treatment effectiveness.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taoyuan, Taiwan, 33004
        • TaoYuan General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. First time visit to Taoyuan general hospital rehabilitation ward at 2016/07/01~2017/12/31
  2. Diagnosis with L spine spondylosis, L spine Herniated Inter-vertebral Disc, or non-acute low back muscle strain
  3. Suitable for physical therapy with ( Hot packing + interference current therapy + pelvic traction + therapeutic exercise )
  4. most pain score >2

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. poor of follow oral order, or patients who can't understand Chinese, including patients with aphasia or dementia
  2. patient who can not received 4 weeks of physical therapy
  3. other cause of low back pain which can't treatment with physical therapy, including : (Urinary tract stones, infection, rapid progression disease which need immediately operation)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: intervention
  1. Give the physical therapy of low back pain educational video + therapist introduction and recommendation video, at the first time of clinic visit.
  2. Physical therapy with hot packing + interference current therapy + pelvic traction + therapeutic exercise, 3 times per week for 4 weeks.
intervention with recommendation and therapist introduction
low back pain education, and physical therapy 3 times per week
Placebo Comparator: placebo
  1. Give the physical therapy of low back pain educational video, at the first time of clinic visit.
  2. Physical therapy with hot packing + interference current therapy + pelvic traction + therapeutic exercise, 3 times per week for 4 weeks.
low back pain education, and physical therapy 3 times per week

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trust score by The Chinese version of the WFPTS(C-WFPTS) between intervention group and placebo group
Time Frame: The first time data collection for individual 5 mins after the intervention.
The first time data collection for individual 5 mins after the intervention.
Success treatment proportion between intervention group and placebo group 4 weeks after intervention
Time Frame: data collection for individual at the 0 and 4th week after clinical visit

Success treatment is defined as the most pain score decrease from baseline more than 2 degree.

( Pain score change from baseline by Visual Analogue Scale after 4 weeks)

data collection for individual at the 0 and 4th week after clinical visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trust score by The Chinese version of the WFPTS(C-WFPTS) between intervention group and placebo group
Time Frame: The second time and third time data collection after 2 weeks and 4 weeks after first clinical visit
The second time and third time data collection after 2 weeks and 4 weeks after first clinical visit
Change of pain score with The Chinese version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-C) between intervention group and placebo group
Time Frame: data collection for individual at the0, 2nd and 4th week after clinical visit
Pain score change from baseline
data collection for individual at the0, 2nd and 4th week after clinical visit
Change of the compression force to trigger the tenderness point from baseline
Time Frame: data collection for individual at the 0, 2nd and 4th week after clinical visit
The compression force was measured by IMADA digital force gauge (kgf) In each data collection point(0 , 2nd and 4th week) , we arrange 3 times test and use the average as the measure value.
data collection for individual at the 0, 2nd and 4th week after clinical visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Huan-Jui Yeh, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TYGH104046

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on intervention

Subscribe