Evaluation the Role of Laparoscopic Management of Perforated Appendicitis
研究概览
详细说明
The LA was performed mostly on uncomplicated appendicitis due to negative opinions about its safety when it was first introduced. However, the application of the procedure has been extended to complicated appendicitis (CA), and it is now considered as an alternative procedure to an open appendectomy (OA) as its safety record has improved . Nevertheless, it is still controversial because there are still concerns about surgical difficulties in managing CA with laparoscopy, overall surgery time, possible post-op complications and conversion to an OA during the surgery.
this study aimed to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of LA for managing perforated appendicitis.
研究类型
注册 (预期的)
阶段
- 不适用
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of acute perforated appendicitis
- fit for laparoscopy and general anesthesia.
- written informed consent.
- short term outcome data and agree to provide contact information.
Exclusion Criteria:
- high risk for general anesthesia.
- Appendicular abscess and appendicular mass .
- ongoing infections including chest infections .
- Children and pregnant females .
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：不适用
- 介入模型：单组作业
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Evaluation the role of Laparoscopic management of perforated a
|
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
early recovery
大体时间：2 day
|
recovery within 2 days
|
2 day
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
wound cosmetic appearance
大体时间：6 months
|
no scare of incision post laporscopic mangement
|
6 months
|
合作者和调查者
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (预期的)
初级完成 (预期的)
研究完成 (预期的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.