Longitudinal, Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Recovery and Added Benefit of a Behavioral Health Intervention for Children With Abusive Head Trauma
2020年9月8日 更新者：University of Colorado, Denver
Family dynamics and caregiver responses to a child with traumatic brain injury are implicated both as precipitating events as well as factors influencing outcomes of abusive head trauma (AHT).
However, no family behavioral health intervention exists to meet the unique needs of families with infants and very young children with AHT.
The study was initially designed as a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the efficacy of an evidence-based behavioral intervention to improve outcomes for families and children with AHT.
However, rates of recruitment were so low that the investigators and funder amended the study to be intervention only (with IRB approval).
At that time, there were five participants and only one had been assigned to the intervention arm.
Only one additional family was recruited, and that family did not complete study measures prior to the time at which the intervention would start and did not receive the intervention.
The investigators did examine outcomes in multiple dimensions, including clinical, cognitive, family, caregiver, child behavior, and service usage over time but connot compare to patients not receiving the intervention.
The investigators were not able to examine characteristics of patients and families best suited for this behavioral health intervention.
研究概览
详细说明
27 children (ages 3 months to 2 years) and their caregiver referred to the Non-Accidental Brain Injury Care Clinic at the Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO) were recruited for participation in the study, 7 families consented.
One family received the Attachment and Biobehavioral (ABC) intervention.
One family discontinued participation.
The data collection schedule was 1 month post-injury, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months.
Outcomes in multiple dimensions, were assessed including clinical recovery, cognitive, language, and motor functioning, family functioning, caregiver mental health including anxiety, depression, competency, and stress.
The investigators also examined service use over time.
Analyses will assess trajectories of recovery for both groups using data for all time points.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
7
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora、Colorado、美国、80045
- Children's Hospital of Colorado
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
3个月 至 2年 (孩子)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children who have experienced AHT as determined by the CHCO Child Protection Team
- Caregivers who speak English
- Families who live in the Denver Metro area and,
- Child-victim age between 3 months and 2 years of age
Exclusion Criteria:
- Those with significant disability that would inhibit participation in the intervention,
- Those scoring below 6 months on developmental measures will not be eligible.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：支持治疗
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：ABC Intervention
The investigators will deliver the "Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC)" in the home weekly using live, in-room coaching, to give caregivers feedback as they use targeted skills during interactions with the child.
The intervention will last 10 sessions.
Study participants in both groups will complete study measures at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, post-intervention, 6 months, and 12 months.
|
Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC) is an in-home, 10-session, manualized parent-training program for children ages 6 months through 2 years who have experienced early adversity.
ABC utilizes parent-child interactions to enhance positive interactions with the child through live coaching with particular focus on nurturing behaviors, following the child's lead, non-frightening behaviors.
These behaviors include appropriate soothing and comforting when a child is distressed, responding to or imitating a child in a contingent way, and displaying warmth.
|
|
无干预：Standard of Care
Subjects will receive normal standard of care without the "Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC)".
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of cognitive scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving usual care.
大体时间：6 months
|
Compare the Cognitive scale standard score from the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The cognitive scale standard score ranges from 50-150.
Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of motor scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving usual care.
大体时间：6 months
|
Compare the overall Motor standard score from the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The overall Motor score is a combined score from the Gross Motor and Fine Motor Scales of the Bayley III.
The overall motor score is a summed value from the Gross Motor and Fine Motor subscales.
Subscale scores are added, then standardized (Mean = 100, SD =15).
The range of values for the overall Motor standard score is 50-150.
Higher values indicate better motor functioning.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of socioemotional scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：6 months
|
Compare scores from the Social-Emotional standard score on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The range of values for the Social-Emotional Scale is 50-150.
Higher values indicate better social-emotional functioning.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of language scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：6 months
|
Compare scores on the overall language score on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The overall language score is the summed score from the Expressive Language and Receptive Language subscales.
The summed value is then standardized (mean = 100, SD = 15).
The range of values are 50-150.
Higher values indicate better language functioning.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of depression scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：6 months
|
Compare caregiver depression scores of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Depression is measured using the Center for Epidemiological Depression Scale (CES-D).
Values range from 0-60.
Higher values indicate greater depressive symptoms.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of anxiety scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：6 months
|
Compare caregiver scores from the Generalized Anxiety scale (GAD) of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The range of values is 0 -21.
Higher values indicate greater anxiety symptoms.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of parenting stress scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：6 months
|
Compare scores on the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the PSI-SF are a sum of scores from non-duplicate items from the Parental Distress subscale, Parent-child dysfunctional interaction subscale, and the difficult child subscale.
Range of values for the total score are 36-180.
Higher values indicate greater parental distress.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of family functioning of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：6 months
|
Compare scores from the General Functioning subscale of the Family Assessment Device of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the General Functioning subscale range from 12 to 48.
Higher values indicate greater family dysfunction.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of screener scores of child abuse risk of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：6 months
|
Compare scores on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory -Brief Version of caregivers receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the brief version range from 0-34.
Higher scores indicate greater potential risk of child abuse.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of caregiver reported service utilization for children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：6 months
|
Compare the utilization of occupational, physical, speech, vision, feeding, or developmental therapy, as well as receipt of nursing care and family psychological services of those families receiving the intervention compared to those receiving care as usual.
Service utilization is captured through a project developed measure asking the respondent if his/her child received any service on the list of services since the last interview period.
Any endorsement of any service will be coded affirmative.
Indicators of use of those receiving the intervention will be compare to those receiving care as usual.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of cognitive scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving usual care.
大体时间：9 months
|
Compare the Cognitive scale standard score from the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The cognitive scale standard score ranges from 50-150.
Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of cognitive scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving usual care.
大体时间：12 months
|
Compare the Cognitive scale standard score from the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The cognitive scale standard score ranges from 50-150.
Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of motor scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving usual care.
大体时间：9 months
|
Compare the overall Motor standard score from the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The overall Motor score is a combined score from the Gross Motor and Fine Motor Scales of the Bayley III.
The overall motor score is a summed value from the Gross Motor and Fine Motor subscales.
Subscale scores are added, then standardized (Mean = 100, SD =15).
The range of values for the overall Motor standard score is 50-150.
Higher values indicate better motor functioning.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of motor scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving usual care.
大体时间：12 months
|
Compare the overall Motor standard score from the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The overall Motor score is a combined score from the Gross Motor and Fine Motor Scales of the Bayley III.
The overall motor score is a summed value from the Gross Motor and Fine Motor subscales.
Subscale scores are added, then standardized (Mean = 100, SD =15).
The range of values for the overall Motor standard score is 50-150.
Higher values indicate better motor functioning.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of socioemotional scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：9 months
|
Compare scores from the Social-Emotional standard score on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The range of values for the Social-Emotional Scale is 50-150.
Higher values indicate better social-emotional functioning.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of socioemotional scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：12 months
|
Compare scores from the Social-Emotional standard score on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The range of values for the Social-Emotional Scale is 50-150.
Higher values indicate better social-emotional functioning.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of language scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：9 months
|
Compare scores on the overall language score on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The overall language score is the summed score from the Expressive Language and Receptive Language subscales.
The summed value is then standardized (mean = 100, SD = 15).
The range of values are 50-150.
Higher values indicate better language functioning.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of language scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：12 months
|
Compare scores on the overall language score on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The overall language score is the summed score from the Expressive Language and Receptive Language subscales.
The summed value is then standardized (mean = 100, SD = 15).
The range of values are 50-150.
Higher values indicate better language functioning.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of depression scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：9 months
|
Compare caregiver depression scores of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Depression is measured using the Center for Epidemiological Depression Scale (CES-D).
Values range from 0-60.
Higher values indicate greater depressive symptoms.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of depression scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：12 months
|
Compare caregiver depression scores of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Depression is measured using the Center for Epidemiological Depression Scale (CES-D).
Values range from 0-60.
Higher values indicate greater depressive symptoms.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of anxiety scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：9 months
|
Compare caregiver scores from the Generalized Anxiety scale (GAD) of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The range of values is 0 -21.
Higher values indicate greater anxiety symptoms.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of anxiety scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：12 months
|
Compare caregiver scores from the Generalized Anxiety scale (GAD) of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The range of values is 0 -21.
Higher values indicate greater anxiety symptoms.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of parenting stress scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：9 months
|
Compare scores on the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the PSI-SF are a sum of scores from non-duplicate items from the Parental Distress subscale, Parent-child dysfunctional interaction subscale, and the difficult child subscale.
Range of values for the total score are 36-180.
Higher values indicate greater parental distress.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of parenting stress scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：12 months
|
Compare scores on the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the PSI-SF are a sum of scores from non-duplicate items from the Parental Distress subscale, Parent-child dysfunctional interaction subscale, and the difficult child subscale.
Range of values for the total score are 36-180.
Higher values indicate greater parental distress.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of family functioning of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：9 months
|
Compare scores from the General Functioning subscale of the Family Assessment Device of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the General Functioning subscale range from 12 to 48.
Higher values indicate greater family dysfunction.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of family functioning of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：12 months
|
Compare scores from the General Functioning subscale of the Family Assessment Device of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the General Functioning subscale range from 12 to 48.
Higher values indicate greater family dysfunction.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of screener scores of child abuse risk of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：9 months
|
Compare scores on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory -Brief Version of caregivers receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the brief version range from 0-34.
Higher scores indicate greater potential risk of child abuse.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of screener scores of child abuse risk of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：12 months
|
Compare scores on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory -Brief Version of caregivers receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the brief version range from 0-34.
Higher scores indicate greater potential risk of child abuse.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of caregiver reported service utilization for children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：9 months
|
Compare the utilization of occupational, physical, speech, vision, feeding, or developmental therapy, as well as receipt of nursing care and family psychological services of those families receiving the intervention compared to those receiving care as usual.
Service utilization is captured through a project developed measure asking the respondent if his/her child received any service on the list of services since the last interview period.
Any endorsement of any service will be coded affirmative.
Indicators of use of those receiving the intervention will be compare to those receiving care as usual.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of caregiver reported service utilization for children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
大体时间：12 months
|
Compare the utilization of occupational, physical, speech, vision, feeding, or developmental therapy, as well as receipt of nursing care and family psychological services of those families receiving the intervention compared to those receiving care as usual.
Service utilization is captured through a project developed measure asking the respondent if his/her child received any service on the list of services since the last interview period.
Any endorsement of any service will be coded affirmative.
Indicators of use of those receiving the intervention will be compare to those receiving care as usual.
|
12 months
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation clusters of patient and family characteristics that benefit most from a parenting intervention component
大体时间：1 month, 3 month, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
Compare any changes in Demographic, family, and injury data aggregated in a latent class approach to identify which constellations of risk and protective factors were most amenable to the intervention.
|
1 month, 3 month, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Terri H Lewis, PhD、University of Colorado, Denver
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2018年4月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2020年6月30日
研究完成 (实际的)
2020年6月30日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2018年1月10日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2018年2月26日
首次发布 (实际的)
2018年2月27日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2020年9月10日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2020年9月8日
最后验证
2020年9月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.