Longitudinal, Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Recovery and Added Benefit of a Behavioral Health Intervention for Children With Abusive Head Trauma
8 settembre 2020 aggiornato da: University of Colorado, Denver
Family dynamics and caregiver responses to a child with traumatic brain injury are implicated both as precipitating events as well as factors influencing outcomes of abusive head trauma (AHT).
However, no family behavioral health intervention exists to meet the unique needs of families with infants and very young children with AHT.
The study was initially designed as a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the efficacy of an evidence-based behavioral intervention to improve outcomes for families and children with AHT.
However, rates of recruitment were so low that the investigators and funder amended the study to be intervention only (with IRB approval).
At that time, there were five participants and only one had been assigned to the intervention arm.
Only one additional family was recruited, and that family did not complete study measures prior to the time at which the intervention would start and did not receive the intervention.
The investigators did examine outcomes in multiple dimensions, including clinical, cognitive, family, caregiver, child behavior, and service usage over time but connot compare to patients not receiving the intervention.
The investigators were not able to examine characteristics of patients and families best suited for this behavioral health intervention.
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Completato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
27 children (ages 3 months to 2 years) and their caregiver referred to the Non-Accidental Brain Injury Care Clinic at the Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO) were recruited for participation in the study, 7 families consented.
One family received the Attachment and Biobehavioral (ABC) intervention.
One family discontinued participation.
The data collection schedule was 1 month post-injury, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months.
Outcomes in multiple dimensions, were assessed including clinical recovery, cognitive, language, and motor functioning, family functioning, caregiver mental health including anxiety, depression, competency, and stress.
The investigators also examined service use over time.
Analyses will assess trajectories of recovery for both groups using data for all time points.
Tipo di studio
Interventistico
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
7
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, Stati Uniti, 80045
- Children's Hospital of Colorado
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
Da 3 mesi a 2 anni (Bambino)
Accetta volontari sani
No
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Tutto
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children who have experienced AHT as determined by the CHCO Child Protection Team
- Caregivers who speak English
- Families who live in the Denver Metro area and,
- Child-victim age between 3 months and 2 years of age
Exclusion Criteria:
- Those with significant disability that would inhibit participation in the intervention,
- Those scoring below 6 months on developmental measures will not be eligible.
Piano di studio
Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Terapia di supporto
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Separare
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Sperimentale: ABC Intervention
The investigators will deliver the "Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC)" in the home weekly using live, in-room coaching, to give caregivers feedback as they use targeted skills during interactions with the child.
The intervention will last 10 sessions.
Study participants in both groups will complete study measures at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, post-intervention, 6 months, and 12 months.
|
Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC) is an in-home, 10-session, manualized parent-training program for children ages 6 months through 2 years who have experienced early adversity.
ABC utilizes parent-child interactions to enhance positive interactions with the child through live coaching with particular focus on nurturing behaviors, following the child's lead, non-frightening behaviors.
These behaviors include appropriate soothing and comforting when a child is distressed, responding to or imitating a child in a contingent way, and displaying warmth.
|
|
Nessun intervento: Standard of Care
Subjects will receive normal standard of care without the "Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC)".
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of cognitive scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving usual care.
Lasso di tempo: 6 months
|
Compare the Cognitive scale standard score from the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The cognitive scale standard score ranges from 50-150.
Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of motor scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving usual care.
Lasso di tempo: 6 months
|
Compare the overall Motor standard score from the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The overall Motor score is a combined score from the Gross Motor and Fine Motor Scales of the Bayley III.
The overall motor score is a summed value from the Gross Motor and Fine Motor subscales.
Subscale scores are added, then standardized (Mean = 100, SD =15).
The range of values for the overall Motor standard score is 50-150.
Higher values indicate better motor functioning.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of socioemotional scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 6 months
|
Compare scores from the Social-Emotional standard score on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The range of values for the Social-Emotional Scale is 50-150.
Higher values indicate better social-emotional functioning.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of language scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 6 months
|
Compare scores on the overall language score on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The overall language score is the summed score from the Expressive Language and Receptive Language subscales.
The summed value is then standardized (mean = 100, SD = 15).
The range of values are 50-150.
Higher values indicate better language functioning.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of depression scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 6 months
|
Compare caregiver depression scores of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Depression is measured using the Center for Epidemiological Depression Scale (CES-D).
Values range from 0-60.
Higher values indicate greater depressive symptoms.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of anxiety scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 6 months
|
Compare caregiver scores from the Generalized Anxiety scale (GAD) of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The range of values is 0 -21.
Higher values indicate greater anxiety symptoms.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of parenting stress scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 6 months
|
Compare scores on the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the PSI-SF are a sum of scores from non-duplicate items from the Parental Distress subscale, Parent-child dysfunctional interaction subscale, and the difficult child subscale.
Range of values for the total score are 36-180.
Higher values indicate greater parental distress.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of family functioning of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 6 months
|
Compare scores from the General Functioning subscale of the Family Assessment Device of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the General Functioning subscale range from 12 to 48.
Higher values indicate greater family dysfunction.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of screener scores of child abuse risk of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 6 months
|
Compare scores on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory -Brief Version of caregivers receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the brief version range from 0-34.
Higher scores indicate greater potential risk of child abuse.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of caregiver reported service utilization for children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 6 months
|
Compare the utilization of occupational, physical, speech, vision, feeding, or developmental therapy, as well as receipt of nursing care and family psychological services of those families receiving the intervention compared to those receiving care as usual.
Service utilization is captured through a project developed measure asking the respondent if his/her child received any service on the list of services since the last interview period.
Any endorsement of any service will be coded affirmative.
Indicators of use of those receiving the intervention will be compare to those receiving care as usual.
|
6 months
|
|
Evaluation of cognitive scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving usual care.
Lasso di tempo: 9 months
|
Compare the Cognitive scale standard score from the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The cognitive scale standard score ranges from 50-150.
Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of cognitive scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving usual care.
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
|
Compare the Cognitive scale standard score from the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The cognitive scale standard score ranges from 50-150.
Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of motor scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving usual care.
Lasso di tempo: 9 months
|
Compare the overall Motor standard score from the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The overall Motor score is a combined score from the Gross Motor and Fine Motor Scales of the Bayley III.
The overall motor score is a summed value from the Gross Motor and Fine Motor subscales.
Subscale scores are added, then standardized (Mean = 100, SD =15).
The range of values for the overall Motor standard score is 50-150.
Higher values indicate better motor functioning.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of motor scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving usual care.
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
|
Compare the overall Motor standard score from the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The overall Motor score is a combined score from the Gross Motor and Fine Motor Scales of the Bayley III.
The overall motor score is a summed value from the Gross Motor and Fine Motor subscales.
Subscale scores are added, then standardized (Mean = 100, SD =15).
The range of values for the overall Motor standard score is 50-150.
Higher values indicate better motor functioning.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of socioemotional scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 9 months
|
Compare scores from the Social-Emotional standard score on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The range of values for the Social-Emotional Scale is 50-150.
Higher values indicate better social-emotional functioning.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of socioemotional scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
|
Compare scores from the Social-Emotional standard score on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The range of values for the Social-Emotional Scale is 50-150.
Higher values indicate better social-emotional functioning.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of language scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 9 months
|
Compare scores on the overall language score on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The overall language score is the summed score from the Expressive Language and Receptive Language subscales.
The summed value is then standardized (mean = 100, SD = 15).
The range of values are 50-150.
Higher values indicate better language functioning.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of language scores of children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
|
Compare scores on the overall language score on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The overall language score is the summed score from the Expressive Language and Receptive Language subscales.
The summed value is then standardized (mean = 100, SD = 15).
The range of values are 50-150.
Higher values indicate better language functioning.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of depression scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 9 months
|
Compare caregiver depression scores of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Depression is measured using the Center for Epidemiological Depression Scale (CES-D).
Values range from 0-60.
Higher values indicate greater depressive symptoms.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of depression scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
|
Compare caregiver depression scores of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Depression is measured using the Center for Epidemiological Depression Scale (CES-D).
Values range from 0-60.
Higher values indicate greater depressive symptoms.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of anxiety scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 9 months
|
Compare caregiver scores from the Generalized Anxiety scale (GAD) of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The range of values is 0 -21.
Higher values indicate greater anxiety symptoms.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of anxiety scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
|
Compare caregiver scores from the Generalized Anxiety scale (GAD) of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
The range of values is 0 -21.
Higher values indicate greater anxiety symptoms.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of parenting stress scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 9 months
|
Compare scores on the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the PSI-SF are a sum of scores from non-duplicate items from the Parental Distress subscale, Parent-child dysfunctional interaction subscale, and the difficult child subscale.
Range of values for the total score are 36-180.
Higher values indicate greater parental distress.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of parenting stress scores of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
|
Compare scores on the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the PSI-SF are a sum of scores from non-duplicate items from the Parental Distress subscale, Parent-child dysfunctional interaction subscale, and the difficult child subscale.
Range of values for the total score are 36-180.
Higher values indicate greater parental distress.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of family functioning of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 9 months
|
Compare scores from the General Functioning subscale of the Family Assessment Device of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the General Functioning subscale range from 12 to 48.
Higher values indicate greater family dysfunction.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of family functioning of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
|
Compare scores from the General Functioning subscale of the Family Assessment Device of those receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the General Functioning subscale range from 12 to 48.
Higher values indicate greater family dysfunction.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of screener scores of child abuse risk of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 9 months
|
Compare scores on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory -Brief Version of caregivers receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the brief version range from 0-34.
Higher scores indicate greater potential risk of child abuse.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of screener scores of child abuse risk of caregivers receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
|
Compare scores on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory -Brief Version of caregivers receiving the intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Scores on the brief version range from 0-34.
Higher scores indicate greater potential risk of child abuse.
|
12 months
|
|
Evaluation of caregiver reported service utilization for children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 9 months
|
Compare the utilization of occupational, physical, speech, vision, feeding, or developmental therapy, as well as receipt of nursing care and family psychological services of those families receiving the intervention compared to those receiving care as usual.
Service utilization is captured through a project developed measure asking the respondent if his/her child received any service on the list of services since the last interview period.
Any endorsement of any service will be coded affirmative.
Indicators of use of those receiving the intervention will be compare to those receiving care as usual.
|
9 months
|
|
Evaluation of caregiver reported service utilization for children receiving the ABC intervention to those receiving care as usual.
Lasso di tempo: 12 months
|
Compare the utilization of occupational, physical, speech, vision, feeding, or developmental therapy, as well as receipt of nursing care and family psychological services of those families receiving the intervention compared to those receiving care as usual.
Service utilization is captured through a project developed measure asking the respondent if his/her child received any service on the list of services since the last interview period.
Any endorsement of any service will be coded affirmative.
Indicators of use of those receiving the intervention will be compare to those receiving care as usual.
|
12 months
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation clusters of patient and family characteristics that benefit most from a parenting intervention component
Lasso di tempo: 1 month, 3 month, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
Compare any changes in Demographic, family, and injury data aggregated in a latent class approach to identify which constellations of risk and protective factors were most amenable to the intervention.
|
1 month, 3 month, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.
Sponsor
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Terri H Lewis, PhD, University of Colorado, Denver
Studiare le date dei record
Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
1 aprile 2018
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
30 giugno 2020
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
30 giugno 2020
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
10 gennaio 2018
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
26 febbraio 2018
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
27 febbraio 2018
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
10 settembre 2020
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
8 settembre 2020
Ultimo verificato
1 settembre 2020
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 17-1221
- IHEA101376 (Altro numero di sovvenzione/finanziamento: Colorado Department of Human Services)
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
NO
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
No
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
No
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .