此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Diabetes Care Programme for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care Setting

2020年4月13日 更新者:Hau Yee CHUNG、Chinese University of Hong Kong

An Evaluation of the Effect of a Diabetes Care Programme for People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Uncontrolled metabolic parameters and co-morbidity risk factors cause Diabetes Mellitus as the leading cause of a multitude of micro-/macro-vascular complications. According to the International Guidelines and Recommendations, people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) should attend diabetes educational programmes periodically and optimize the metabolic index of control. In Hong Kong, General Practitioners with solo-practice (GP-SP) have the least availability of resources and support in DM management. A discrepancy of diabetes care between public and private settings and a gap of clinical practice between public-private healthcare settings is identified. In relation to the big population of T2DM is caring by GP-SP but no structured Diabetes Care Programme (DCP) is in place. A structured DCP for T2DM is in need to fill up the clinical gap and make beneficial to the target subjects.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a DCP for people with T2DM in primary care settings. It is a multi-center, single-blind randomized controlled trial with parallel groups pre-test and post-test design. The evidence-based intervention (DCP) will be carried out in a private primary care setting. People with T2DM attending the GP-SP who meet the study criteria will be randomly assigned into one of the two study groups, either "DCP in addition to usual medical care" or "Usual medical care only" as a control group. The intervention group can beneficial in clinical and psychosocial outcomes after the completion of the 20-week structured DCP with a greater improvement of HbA1c level, Self-Efficacy in diabetes management, Diabetes Empowerment level, Diabetes Knowledge, and Quality of Life than those who only received usual medical care at the GP-SP.

研究概览

地位

未知

条件

详细说明

This study is to implement an evidence-based develop Diabetes Care Programme (DCP) for 152 adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in a few clinics of a general practitioner with solo-practice (GP-SP) in community, and evaluate its effectiveness by comparing the outcomes between study group (DCP with the usual medical care) and control group (Usual medical care only). It is believed that a structured DCP can promote greater clinical outcomes improvement and behavioral changes in the study group as evidence showed in literature. The primary outcomes are glycemic control (HbA1c level) and Self-Efficacy in diabetes management; whereas Diabetes Empowerment level, Diabetes Knowledge and Quality of Life are the secondary outcomes.

The DCP consists of two parts, conduct 3 interactive group education with an innovative educational tool "Diabetes Conversation Map™" sessions by dietitian and diabetes educator/nurse. Then it followed by another 8 weeks for delivering two 15-30 minutes teleconsultations for patient empowerment and follow-up of "Action Plan" by a diabetes educator/nurse. Evaluation of outcomes will be done before the DCP (baseline), at week-8 (right after the group sessions), and at week-20 (4 weeks after the last teleconsultation).

In addition, a focus group interview will be carried out after the completion of the whole intervention. It purposes to explore and get valuable descriptive information and feelings from participants about the intervention and diabetes self-management.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (预期的)

152

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Hong Kong SAR
      • Hong Kong、Hong Kong SAR、香港、Hong Kong
        • 招聘中
        • Clinics of private general practitioners
        • 接触:

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 75年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. People with T2DM and follow up at private general practitioner
  2. Age 18-75
  3. Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >7.0%
  4. Can communicate in Cantonese

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Insulin users
  2. Unstable emotional and/or mental status
  3. Cognitive impairment and/or learning disabilities
  4. Recruited in other research and/or diabetes educational programme during the study period

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:支持治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Diabetes Care Programme
People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus of private general practitioner (GP) with solo-practice who receive the intervention (Diabetes Care Programme) in addition to usual medical care at the GP
20-week Diabetes Care Programme consists of three Diabetes Conversation Map sessions in 8 weeks with 3-4 weeks intervals, then two teleconsultations at week 12th and week 16th
无干预:Standard Usual Care
People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus of private general practitioner (GP) with solo-practice who only receive the usual medical care at the GP

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)
大体时间:Change from Baseline HbA1c at week 20
Glycemic control
Change from Baseline HbA1c at week 20
Self-efficacy level in diabetes management
大体时间:Change from Baseline Self-efficacy level at week 8
To assess the Self-efficacy level in diabetes management of Chinese people with diabetes. Includes 20 items of self-care in six domains with 1-10 rating scale. Higher score means better self-care.
Change from Baseline Self-efficacy level at week 8
Self-efficacy level in diabetes management
大体时间:Change from Baseline Self-efficacy level at week 20
To assess the Self-efficacy level in diabetes management of Chinese people with diabetes. Includes 20 items of self-care in six domains with 1-10 rating scale. Higher score means better self-care.
Change from Baseline Self-efficacy level at week 20

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Diabetes Empowerment Scale
大体时间:Change from Baseline Psycho-social Self-efficacy level at week 8
To assess the overall psycho-social self-efficacy level of Chinese people with diabetes. It includes 10 items with a 1-5 rating scale. A higher score means a higher level of self-efficacy.
Change from Baseline Psycho-social Self-efficacy level at week 8
Diabetes Empowerment Scale
大体时间:Change from Baseline Psycho-social Self-efficacy level at week 20
To assess the overall psycho-social self-efficacy level of Chinese people with diabetes. It includes 10 items with a 1-5 rating scale. A higher score means a higher level of self-efficacy.
Change from Baseline Psycho-social Self-efficacy level at week 20
Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire
大体时间:Change from Baseline Diabetes self-care knowledge at week 8
To assess the Diabetes self-care knowledge of Chinese people with diabetes. It includes 24 items of diabetes self-care knowledge with the total score range from 0-24. Valid responses with "yes", "no" or "I don't know"; only scored on correct answers. A higher score means a higher level of diabetes knowledge.
Change from Baseline Diabetes self-care knowledge at week 8
Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire
大体时间:Change from Baseline Diabetes self-care knowledge at week 20
To assess the Diabetes self-care knowledge of Chinese people with diabetes. It includes 24 items of diabetes self-care knowledge with the total score range from 0-24. Valid responses with "yes", "no" or "I don't know"; only scored on correct answers. A higher score means a higher level of diabetes knowledge.
Change from Baseline Diabetes self-care knowledge at week 20
Quality of life Measurement
大体时间:Change from Baseline Quality of Life status at week 8
The valuation of health status (quality of life) of Chinese people. It includes 5 health dimensions with a sum of negative validity & 1 visual analog scale to reflect the self-rated health score. A higher score means a higher quality of life status.
Change from Baseline Quality of Life status at week 8
Quality of life Measurement
大体时间:Change from Baseline Quality of Life status at week 20
The valuation of health status (quality of life) of Chinese people. It includes 5 health dimensions with a sum of negative validity & 1 visual analog scale to reflect the self-rated health score. A higher score means a higher quality of life status.
Change from Baseline Quality of Life status at week 20

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Hau Yee H CHUNG、Chinese University of Hong Kong

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2019年11月1日

初级完成 (预期的)

2020年12月31日

研究完成 (预期的)

2021年3月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2020年4月5日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2020年4月13日

首次发布 (实际的)

2020年4月16日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2020年4月16日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2020年4月13日

最后验证

2020年4月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • CREC2019.290
  • Clinical Research Ethics (其他标识符:Joint CUHK-NTEC CREC)

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅