Diabetes Care Programme for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care Setting

April 13, 2020 updated by: Hau Yee CHUNG, Chinese University of Hong Kong

An Evaluation of the Effect of a Diabetes Care Programme for People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Uncontrolled metabolic parameters and co-morbidity risk factors cause Diabetes Mellitus as the leading cause of a multitude of micro-/macro-vascular complications. According to the International Guidelines and Recommendations, people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) should attend diabetes educational programmes periodically and optimize the metabolic index of control. In Hong Kong, General Practitioners with solo-practice (GP-SP) have the least availability of resources and support in DM management. A discrepancy of diabetes care between public and private settings and a gap of clinical practice between public-private healthcare settings is identified. In relation to the big population of T2DM is caring by GP-SP but no structured Diabetes Care Programme (DCP) is in place. A structured DCP for T2DM is in need to fill up the clinical gap and make beneficial to the target subjects.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a DCP for people with T2DM in primary care settings. It is a multi-center, single-blind randomized controlled trial with parallel groups pre-test and post-test design. The evidence-based intervention (DCP) will be carried out in a private primary care setting. People with T2DM attending the GP-SP who meet the study criteria will be randomly assigned into one of the two study groups, either "DCP in addition to usual medical care" or "Usual medical care only" as a control group. The intervention group can beneficial in clinical and psychosocial outcomes after the completion of the 20-week structured DCP with a greater improvement of HbA1c level, Self-Efficacy in diabetes management, Diabetes Empowerment level, Diabetes Knowledge, and Quality of Life than those who only received usual medical care at the GP-SP.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is to implement an evidence-based develop Diabetes Care Programme (DCP) for 152 adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in a few clinics of a general practitioner with solo-practice (GP-SP) in community, and evaluate its effectiveness by comparing the outcomes between study group (DCP with the usual medical care) and control group (Usual medical care only). It is believed that a structured DCP can promote greater clinical outcomes improvement and behavioral changes in the study group as evidence showed in literature. The primary outcomes are glycemic control (HbA1c level) and Self-Efficacy in diabetes management; whereas Diabetes Empowerment level, Diabetes Knowledge and Quality of Life are the secondary outcomes.

The DCP consists of two parts, conduct 3 interactive group education with an innovative educational tool "Diabetes Conversation Map™" sessions by dietitian and diabetes educator/nurse. Then it followed by another 8 weeks for delivering two 15-30 minutes teleconsultations for patient empowerment and follow-up of "Action Plan" by a diabetes educator/nurse. Evaluation of outcomes will be done before the DCP (baseline), at week-8 (right after the group sessions), and at week-20 (4 weeks after the last teleconsultation).

In addition, a focus group interview will be carried out after the completion of the whole intervention. It purposes to explore and get valuable descriptive information and feelings from participants about the intervention and diabetes self-management.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

152

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Hong Kong SAR
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Clinics of private general practitioners
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. People with T2DM and follow up at private general practitioner
  2. Age 18-75
  3. Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >7.0%
  4. Can communicate in Cantonese

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Insulin users
  2. Unstable emotional and/or mental status
  3. Cognitive impairment and/or learning disabilities
  4. Recruited in other research and/or diabetes educational programme during the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Diabetes Care Programme
People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus of private general practitioner (GP) with solo-practice who receive the intervention (Diabetes Care Programme) in addition to usual medical care at the GP
20-week Diabetes Care Programme consists of three Diabetes Conversation Map sessions in 8 weeks with 3-4 weeks intervals, then two teleconsultations at week 12th and week 16th
No Intervention: Standard Usual Care
People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus of private general practitioner (GP) with solo-practice who only receive the usual medical care at the GP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline HbA1c at week 20
Glycemic control
Change from Baseline HbA1c at week 20
Self-efficacy level in diabetes management
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Self-efficacy level at week 8
To assess the Self-efficacy level in diabetes management of Chinese people with diabetes. Includes 20 items of self-care in six domains with 1-10 rating scale. Higher score means better self-care.
Change from Baseline Self-efficacy level at week 8
Self-efficacy level in diabetes management
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Self-efficacy level at week 20
To assess the Self-efficacy level in diabetes management of Chinese people with diabetes. Includes 20 items of self-care in six domains with 1-10 rating scale. Higher score means better self-care.
Change from Baseline Self-efficacy level at week 20

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diabetes Empowerment Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Psycho-social Self-efficacy level at week 8
To assess the overall psycho-social self-efficacy level of Chinese people with diabetes. It includes 10 items with a 1-5 rating scale. A higher score means a higher level of self-efficacy.
Change from Baseline Psycho-social Self-efficacy level at week 8
Diabetes Empowerment Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Psycho-social Self-efficacy level at week 20
To assess the overall psycho-social self-efficacy level of Chinese people with diabetes. It includes 10 items with a 1-5 rating scale. A higher score means a higher level of self-efficacy.
Change from Baseline Psycho-social Self-efficacy level at week 20
Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Diabetes self-care knowledge at week 8
To assess the Diabetes self-care knowledge of Chinese people with diabetes. It includes 24 items of diabetes self-care knowledge with the total score range from 0-24. Valid responses with "yes", "no" or "I don't know"; only scored on correct answers. A higher score means a higher level of diabetes knowledge.
Change from Baseline Diabetes self-care knowledge at week 8
Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Diabetes self-care knowledge at week 20
To assess the Diabetes self-care knowledge of Chinese people with diabetes. It includes 24 items of diabetes self-care knowledge with the total score range from 0-24. Valid responses with "yes", "no" or "I don't know"; only scored on correct answers. A higher score means a higher level of diabetes knowledge.
Change from Baseline Diabetes self-care knowledge at week 20
Quality of life Measurement
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Quality of Life status at week 8
The valuation of health status (quality of life) of Chinese people. It includes 5 health dimensions with a sum of negative validity & 1 visual analog scale to reflect the self-rated health score. A higher score means a higher quality of life status.
Change from Baseline Quality of Life status at week 8
Quality of life Measurement
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Quality of Life status at week 20
The valuation of health status (quality of life) of Chinese people. It includes 5 health dimensions with a sum of negative validity & 1 visual analog scale to reflect the self-rated health score. A higher score means a higher quality of life status.
Change from Baseline Quality of Life status at week 20

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hau Yee H CHUNG, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CREC2019.290
  • Clinical Research Ethics (Other Identifier: Joint CUHK-NTEC CREC)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Care Programme

3
Subscribe