Impact of Decision Quality by Using Question Prompt List
2021年8月1日 更新者：National Taiwan University Hospital
Impact of Decision Quality by Using Question Prompt List on the Shared Decision Making in End-stage Renal Disease Patients
To investigate the effects of a question prompt list (QPL) on a shared decision-making consultation among facing decision for dialysis in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the university medical center of North Taiwan.
Subjects were randomized assigned to QPL group or usual care group.
Decisional quality and decision control preferences were assessed with questionnaires.
Measurements were performed at before the counseling (T0), immediately after counseling (T1), and evaluate decision regret at one month after treatment.
研究概览
详细说明
The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of decisional quality and decisional control preferences by using a specific question prompt list (QPL) during a shared decision-making consultation among facing decision for dialysis in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the university medical center of North Taiwan.
Recruit subjects are those who are about to receive the nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making (SDM) for patients with ESRD and attend the program.
By using blocked Randomization design, the investigators assigned participants to QPL group or usual care.
Prior to a clinic visit to discuss treatment, two-pages ESRD QPL leaflets are provided to QPL group, while usual care group without receiving provision of QPL.
Measurements of outcome included decision quality (decision conflict, decisional self-efficiency) and decision control preference at before the counseling (T0), immediately after counseling (T1), and evaluate decision regret at one month after treatment (T2), at this time the patient has decided and started to accept the selected treatment (hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or conservative treatment).
All statistical analyses were performed in SAS statistical software, version 9.4 (SAS, Cary, NC).
The effects of the intervention were assessed by generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis with the coefficient of interaction ( group × time) term.
Statistical tests were two-sided with a significance level of 0.05.
Hierarchical Linear Model was used to detect the impact of nested within physician.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (预期的)
154
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Xindian
-
Taipei City、Xindian、台湾、231
- National Taiwan University Hospital
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
20年 及以上 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease who facing decision for dialysis;
- normal cognitive functions;
- be able to read, communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese;
- ability to express willingness;
Exclusion Criteria:
- vision or hearing function impairment;
- Severe illness;
- Urgent to dialysis for extend life;
- Dialysis modalities Already decided.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：支持治疗
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：QPL group
receive 2-pages ESRD QPL leaflets, circle the questions they want to ask before consultation.
encourage asking questions with doctor during consultation.
receive the nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making (SDM)
|
The specific QPS was a one page leaflet for chronic kidney disease which developed by applied literature and public QPL from the National Health Agency.
It contains 3 domains 25 questions related to treatment, dialysis, and Kidney transplant.
The QPL group participants were asked to read and mark those questions they concerned or write down additional problems.
|
|
无干预：Usual care group
without receiving provision of QPL encourage asking questions with doctor during consultation.
receive the nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making (SDM)
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Decision conflict
大体时间：before the counseling (T0), immediately after counseling(T1)
|
Decision conflict was measured by Decision conflict scale(DCS).
The scale consists of 16 items into 5 subscales: Uncertainty(3 items), Informed(3 items), values clarity(3 items), support(3 items), and effective decision(4 items) that are rated on a 5-point likert-scale from "strongly agree" (0) to "strongly disagree" (4).
The sum of scores are calculated from 0 to 100.
The higher the score, the higher the level of decision conflict.
|
before the counseling (T0), immediately after counseling(T1)
|
|
Decisional self-efficiency
大体时间：before the counseling (T0), immediately after counseling(T1)
|
Decision self-efficiency was measured by Decisional Self-Efficiency Scale(DSES).
The scale represents self-confidence or belief in decision making.
The scale consists of 11 items that are rated on a 5-point likert-scale from "not at all confident" (0) to" very confident "(4) .
The sum of scores are calculated from 0 to 100.
The higher the score, the higher the level of self-confidence.
|
before the counseling (T0), immediately after counseling(T1)
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Decision control preference
大体时间：one month after treatment (T2)
|
Decision regret was measured by Decision regret Scale(DRS) .The scale consists of 5 items that are rated on a 5-point likert-scale from "strongly agree "(1) to" strongly disagree" (5) .
The sum of scores are calculated from 0 to 100.
The higher the score, the higher the level of regret.
|
one month after treatment (T2)
|
|
Decision control preference
大体时间：before the counseling (T0), immediately after counseling(T1)
|
Decision control preference was measured by Decision control preference Scale(DCPS) .The scale asks two question:(1)control preference measured at before the counseling; (2) actual decision control level measured after counseling immediately.
|
before the counseling (T0), immediately after counseling(T1)
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (预期的)
2021年8月15日
初级完成 (预期的)
2022年6月30日
研究完成 (预期的)
2022年8月31日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2021年7月26日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2021年7月26日
首次发布 (实际的)
2021年8月2日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2021年8月9日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2021年8月1日
最后验证
2021年5月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.