RIDECLAS: Delphi Classification of RICA Pathway Recommendations (RIDECLAS)
2026年5月22日 更新者:Jose-M Ramirez、Universidad de Zaragoza
Delphi Study for the Classification of Recommendations for the RICA Pathway (Enhanced Recovery in Adult Surgery)
RIDECLAS is an observational, prospective, non-interventional consensus study using a modified Delphi methodology.
The study aims to obtain expert consensus on the classification and final formulation of recommendations for the RICA Pathway, an enhanced recovery pathway for adult surgery.
Participants will be healthcare professionals with experience in enhanced recovery, perioperative medicine, surgery, anesthesiology, nursing, rehabilitation, or related disciplines.
Experts will complete sequential online questionnaires.
Individual responses will remain confidential, and aggregated anonymized feedback will be provided between Delphi rounds.
The study does not involve patients, clinical interventions, biological samples, drugs, or medical devices.
研究概览
详细说明
This study will use a modified Delphi process conducted remotely through electronic questionnaires.
A coordinating committee will prepare an initial list of recommendations based on the previous RICA Pathway document and updated evidence.
Expert panelists will rate each recommendation using a 1-to-9 Likert scale and may provide free-text comments.
Two Delphi rounds are planned, with a third round if needed for items without sufficient consensus or for reformulated statements.
Between rounds, participants will receive aggregated and anonymized feedback, including measures of agreement, median scores, dispersion, and a summary of comments.
Consensus for acceptance is predefined as at least 75% of ratings in the 7-9 range and no more than 15% in the 1-3 range.
Consensus for rejection is predefined as at least 75% of ratings in the 1-3 range and no more than 15% in the 7-9 range.
Items not meeting consensus criteria may be reassessed in subsequent rounds.
The analysis will be descriptive and will include response rates, attrition between rounds, item-level agreement, median scores, interquartile ranges, and qualitative thematic review of comments.
研究类型
观察性的
注册 (估计的)
384
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习联系方式
- 姓名:José-Manuel Ramírez Rodríguez, Professor of Surgery
- 电话号码:+34 976 556400
- 邮箱:jramirez@unizar.es
学习地点
-
-
Zaragoza
-
Zaragoza、Zaragoza、西班牙、50009
- Department of Surgery
-
接触:
- Grupo Español de Rehabilitacion Multimodal GERM SOCIEDAD CIENTIFICA
- 电话号码:+34 636935065
- 邮箱:secretariagerm@gmail.com
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
是的
取样方法
非概率样本
研究人群
The study population will consist of healthcare professionals and scientific society members with experience in enhanced recovery pathways, perioperative medicine, surgery, anesthesiology, nursing, rehabilitation, or related disciplines.
Participants will be invited from the Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal (GERM) and related professional networks.
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthcare professional or researcher with relevant clinical or scientific experience in enhanced recovery pathways, perioperative medicine, surgery, anesthesiology, nursing, rehabilitation, or related disciplines.
At least 5 years of professional experience. Membership in GERM or participation in professional networks related to enhanced recovery in adult surgery.
Willingness to participate in the planned Delphi rounds. Provision of electronic informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Failure to meet the predefined professional experience criteria. Failure to provide informed consent. Failure to complete the first Delphi round. Duplicate or incomplete responses that cannot be validated for analysis.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
Expert Panel
Healthcare professionals with experience in enhanced recovery pathways, perioperative medicine, surgery, anesthesiology, nursing, rehabilitation, or related disciplines who are invited to participate in the modified Delphi process.
|
Sequential online questionnaires used to rate and classify proposed RICA Pathway recommendations.
This is not a clinical intervention and does not involve patient care, drugs, devices, or invasive procedures.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Expert consensus on RICA Pathway recommendations
大体时间:Through study completion, up to 7 months
|
Consensus will be assessed for each recommendation using predefined Delphi criteria.
Acceptance consensus will be defined as at least 75% of ratings in the 7-9 range and no more than 15% in the 1-3 range.
Rejection consensus will be defined as at least 75% of ratings in the 1-3 range and no more than 15% in the 7-9 range.
|
Through study completion, up to 7 months
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Degree of agreement for each recommendation
大体时间:After each Delphi round, up to 7 months.
|
Distribution of ratings, median score, interquartile range, and percentage of ratings in predefined agreement/disagreement ranges.
|
After each Delphi round, up to 7 months.
|
|
Stability of ratings between Delphi rounds
大体时间:Between round 1 and round 2, and round 3 if performed, up to 7 months.
|
Descriptive assessment of changes in item-level ratings and consensus status between rounds.
|
Between round 1 and round 2, and round 3 if performed, up to 7 months.
|
|
Response rate and attrition between rounds
大体时间:After each Delphi round, up to 7 months.
|
Number and percentage of invited experts who complete each round, and percentage lost between rounds.
|
After each Delphi round, up to 7 months.
|
|
Qualitative analysis of expert comments
大体时间:After each Delphi round, up to 7 months.
|
Thematic review of free-text comments to support item reformulation and interpretation of items without consensus.
|
After each Delphi round, up to 7 months.
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
一般刊物
- Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet. 2003 Dec 6;362(9399):1921-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14966-5.
- Gattrell WT, Logullo P, van Zuuren EJ, Price A, Hughes EL, Blazey P, Winchester CC, Tovey D, Goldman K, Hungin AP, Harrison N. ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi. PLoS Med. 2024 Jan 23;21(1):e1004326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004326. eCollection 2024 Jan.
- Grupo de trabajo. Vía Clínica de Recuperación Intensificada en Cirugía del Adulto (RICA). Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal (GERM); 2026. Available at: https://grupogerm.es/via-rica-web/
- Ripolles-Melchor J, Ramirez-Rodriguez JM, Casans-Frances R, Aldecoa C, Abad-Motos A, Logrono-Egea M, Garcia-Erce JA, Camps-Cervantes A, Ferrando-Ortola C, Suarez de la Rica A, Cuellar-Martinez A, Marmana-Mezquita S, Abad-Gurumeta A, Calvo-Vecino JM; POWER Study Investigators Group for the Spanish Perioperative Audit and Research Network (REDGERM). Association Between Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Postoperative Complications in Colorectal Surgery: The Postoperative Outcomes Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol (POWER) Study. JAMA Surg. 2019 Aug 1;154(8):725-736. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0995.
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
2026年6月1日
初级完成 (估计的)
2026年12月31日
研究完成 (估计的)
2026年12月31日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2026年5月22日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2026年5月22日
首次发布 (实际的)
2026年5月29日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2026年5月29日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2026年5月22日
最后验证
2026年5月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
关键字
其他研究编号
- GERMDELPHI
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
不
IPD 计划说明
Individual participant data will not be shared.
This is a modified Delphi consensus study involving expert panelists rather than patients.
Individual responses will be treated confidentially, stored in coded form, and analyzed and reported only in aggregate.
Sharing individual-level responses could compromise participant confidentiality and may affect the independence of expert judgment in the Delphi process.
Aggregated results, consensus levels, and methodological details will be reported in the final publication.
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
不
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
不
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.