此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Impact of a Simulated Mini-CEX on Clinical Performance During a Real-World Mini-CEX

2026年6月18日 更新者：Mhamed Sami Mebazaa、Mongi Slim Hospital

Impact of a Simulated Mini-CEX on Clinical Performance During a Real-World Mini-CEX: A Multicenter Study in Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine

Modern medical education is based on competency-based learning and the use of formative assessment tools in real clinical settings, such as the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX). However, the impact of a prior simulated mini-CEX experience on subsequent performance in real clinical settings remains insufficiently studied, particularly among medical students in anesthesiology-intensive care (DCEM3). This study aimed to assess the effect of a simulated mini-CEX on performance during a real mini-CEX in pre-anesthetic consultation.

研究概览

地位

尚未招聘

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

We conducted a prospective, multicenter interventional study over 4 weeks in three anesthesiology-intensive care departments in Tunis. Volunteer DCEM3 students were assessed by trained anesthesiology faculty using the mini-CEX tool. The intervention consisted of a structured two-step assessment of pre-anesthetic consultation: a standardized simulation followed by a real clinical encounter. Performance was evaluated using a 7-domain mini-CEX checklist, including direct observation, scoring, and immediate formative feedback. The primary outcome was the overall mini-CEX score. Secondary outcomes included domain-specific scores, inter-rater reliability, individual progression, and participant satisfaction.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

18

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

  • 姓名：Mhamed Sami Mebazaa, professor
  • 电话号码：00216 22252589
  • 邮箱：msmebazaa@gmail.com

研究联系人备份

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fifth-year medical students (DCEM3) enrolled at the Faculty of Medicine of Tunis within the acute medicine program.
  • Students completing their clinical clerkship during the second semester of the 2025-2026 academic year in one of the three participating anesthesiology and intensive care departments.
  • Students who voluntarily agree to participate and have provided written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students who do not complete the entire educational curriculum (absence from either of the two assessments).
  • Students who have already received similar training.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 主要用途：其他
  • 分配：不适用
  • 介入模型：单组作业
  • 屏蔽：无（打开标签）

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的：DCEM3 students
Fifth-year medical students in the second cycle during their internship in anesthesiology and intensive care.
其他：Behavioral
Mini-CEX educational assessment during pre-anesthetic consultation: Volunteer fifth-year medical students were assessed by trained anesthesiology faculty using the mini-CEX tool. The intervention consisted of a structured two-step assessment of pre-anesthetic consultation: a standardized simulation followed by a real clinical encounter.
其他名称：
  • Simulated Mini-CEX
  • Mini-CEX-based educational intervention

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
students' overall performance
大体时间：Through study completion, up to 4 weeks

measured by the mean score on the Mini-CEX checklist, compared between simulated consultation and real consultation.

The overall performance is assessed using the unabbreviated Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) checklist. The global score is measured on a 9-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (insufficient/unsatisfactory performance) to 9 (exceptional/exemplary performance). Higher scores indicate a better clinical performance and greater student autonomy.
Through study completion, up to 4 weeks

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Scores for each domain
大体时间：at the and of each Mini-CEX , Through study completion, up to 4 weeks
Scores for each domain (history taking, physical examination, clinical judgment, communication skills, professionalism, organization and efficiency, and overall clinical performance). Measured by the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) checklist, compared between the simulated consultation (baseline) and the real clinical consultation. The checklist uses a 9-point Likert scale where 1 represents the lowest performance (insufficient) and 9 represents the highest performance (exceptional). Higher scores indicate a better clinical outcome.
at the and of each Mini-CEX , Through study completion, up to 4 weeks
Inter-rater reproducibility of Mini-CEX
大体时间：at the end of the simulated Mini-CEx, Through study completion, up to 4 weeks
Inter-rater reproducibility was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC
at the end of the simulated Mini-CEx, Through study completion, up to 4 weeks
Individual performance gain
大体时间：at the end of the internship, Through study completion, up to 4 weeks
Individual performance gain (delta between simulated and real Mini-CEX scores) Calculated as the change score between the real clinical consultation and the simulated consultation (Real score minus Simulated score) using the unabbreviated Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX). The original Mini-CEX scale ranges from a minimum value of 1 (insufficient performance) to a maximum value of 9 (exceptional performance). The resulting performance gain score ranges from -8 to +8. A higher or positive score indicates a better outcome (improvement/performance gain), a score of 0 indicates no change, and a negative score indicates a decrease in performance.
at the end of the internship, Through study completion, up to 4 weeks
Learner and faculty satisfaction
大体时间：at the end of internship, Through study completion, up to 4 weeks
Learner and faculty satisfaction, as well as their recommendation for the use of the Mini-CEX throughout the curriculum, assessed using a Likert scale. Assessed via a post-internship questionnaire completed by both students (learners) and professors (faculty) regarding their satisfaction with the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) and their recommendation for its integration throughout the curriculum. Responses are evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from a minimum score of 1 (Strongly disagree / Very dissatisfied) to a maximum score of 5 (Strongly agree / Very satisfied). Higher scores indicate a better outcome, representing higher levels of satisfaction and a stronger recommendation for curriculum implementation.
at the end of internship, Through study completion, up to 4 weeks
The time required to complete the consultation
大体时间：at the end of each Mini-Cex, Through study completion, up to 4 weeks
The time required to complete the consultation (measured in minutes)
at the end of each Mini-Cex, Through study completion, up to 4 weeks

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

Mongi Slim Hospital

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年6月2日

初级完成 (估计的)

2026年6月26日

研究完成 (估计的)

2026年6月26日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月2日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月18日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月23日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年6月23日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年6月18日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

关键字

其他研究编号

  • Simulated mini-CEX

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅