Rehacom or Wechsler Assessment Methodology in Cognitive Abilities of Normal Children: Correlation Study
2026年9月11日 更新者：Mostafa S Ali、Cairo University
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between a computerized cognitive assessment tool (Rehacom) and a traditional intelligence scale (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children) in assessing cognitive abilities among typically developing children.
Specifically, the study aims to determine whether Rehacom subtests (logical reasoning, memory for words, and visual field) correlate significantly with total Wechsler scores.
研究概览
地位
完全的
条件
详细说明
Cognitive assessment in children requires reliable and valid measurement tools. Traditional paper-and-pencil intelligence tests, such as the Wechsler scales, are considered the gold standard; however, they require lengthy administration and significant examiner expertise. Computerized systems like Rehacom offer potential advantages including standardized administration, precise timing, and automated scoring. Nevertheless, the convergent validity between Rehacom and traditional measures in healthy children has not been thoroughly established. Prior research suggests that computerized cognitive tasks may share moderate variance with traditional IQ tests, particularly in domains such as logical reasoning and memory, but specific visual field tasks may assess distinct constructs. Therefore, empirical validation is needed to guide clinicians in interpreting Rehacom scores.
HYPOTHESES:
- There will be no significant correlation between Rehacom logical reasoning scores and total Wechsler scores.
- There will be no significant correlation between Rehacom memory for words scores and total Wechsler scores.
- There will be no significant correlation between Rehacom visual field measures and total Wechsler scores.
研究类型
观察性的
注册 (实际的)
150
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Giza Governorate
-
Giza、Giza Governorate、埃及、11432
- Cairo University
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 孩子
接受健康志愿者
是的
取样方法
概率样本
研究人群
This study employs a cross-sectional correlational design.
Following ethical approval and obtaining informed consent from parents or legal guardians, 150 typically developing children (age range 9-11 years) will be recruited from mainstream primary schools.
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 9 and 11 years.
- Normal intellectual development and academic progress according to teacher reports.
- No documented history of neurological, psychiatric, or learning disorders.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), or intellectual disability.
- History of significant head injury or chronic medical conditions affecting cognitive functioning.
- Receiving special educational support services.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
logical reasoning
大体时间：2 weeks
|
it is measured by Rehacom Cognitive Assessment System and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (appropriate edition) Average (90-110): Represents typical intellectual functioning for a person's age group.Low/High Average (80-89 / 110-119): Falls just below or above the typical average range.Gifted (130 and above): Indicates superior or highly advanced cognitive abilities.Extremely Low (69 and below): Suggests significant cognitive delays or intellectual disability.
|
2 weeks
|
|
memory for words
大体时间：2 weeks
|
it is measured by Rehacom Cognitive Assessment System and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (appropriate edition) Average (90-110): Represents typical intellectual functioning for a person's age group.Low/High Average (80-89 / 110-119): Falls just below or above the typical average range.Gifted (130 and above): Indicates superior or highly advanced cognitive abilities.Extremely Low (69 and below): Suggests significant cognitive delays or intellectual disability.
|
2 weeks
|
|
visual field left
大体时间：2 weeks
|
it is measured by Rehacom Cognitive Assessment System and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (appropriate edition) Average (90-110): Represents typical intellectual functioning for a person's age group.Low/High Average (80-89 / 110-119): Falls just below or above the typical average range.Gifted (130 and above): Indicates superior or highly advanced cognitive abilities.Extremely Low (69 and below): Suggests significant cognitive delays or intellectual disability.
|
2 weeks
|
|
visual field right
大体时间：2 weeks
|
it is measured by Rehacom Cognitive Assessment System and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (appropriate edition) Average (90-110): Represents typical intellectual functioning for a person's age group.Low/High Average (80-89 / 110-119): Falls just below or above the typical average range.Gifted (130 and above): Indicates superior or highly advanced cognitive abilities.Extremely Low (69 and below): Suggests significant cognitive delays or intellectual disability.
|
2 weeks
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Mostafa S. Ali, Phd、Cairo University
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2026年3月20日
初级完成 (实际的)
2026年6月20日
研究完成 (实际的)
2026年7月10日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2026年9月7日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2026年9月10日
首次发布 (实际的)
2026年9月14日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2026年9月15日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2026年9月11日
最后验证
2026年9月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.