Impact of AI Care Summaries on Caregiver Comprehension
Impact of AI Care Summaries on Caregiver Comprehension of Hospital Course
The primary objective is to assess if an AI-generated plain language summary of an inpatient progress note can improve caregiver understanding of their child's hospitalization by measuring differences in Hospital Course Comprehension scores, based on their responses to a survey regarding their child's hospital course.
Secondary objectives include exploring the caregiver's perspective on the use of AI in clinical care, as well as 7-day and 30-day readmission rates, 7-day and 30-day emergency department (ED) re-utilization rates, length of stay, and environmental impact measures.
研究概览
详细说明
This randomized controlled trial evaluates whether AI-generated plain-language summaries of inpatient progress notes improve caregiver understanding of a child's hospitalization. The intervention uses a Children's National HIPAA-compliant large language model hosted within the institution's Azure environment to generate caregiver-facing summaries from attending-signed inpatient progress notes.
Eligible caregivers are randomized to receive either standard hospital communication alone or standard communication plus an attending-approved AI-generated care summary. Before distribution to caregivers, attending physicians review generated summaries for clinical appropriateness and accuracy.
Caregiver understanding of the hospitalization is assessed using a structured survey administered during the hospitalization. Responses are compared with information documented in the medical record to evaluate comprehension. Additional exploratory analyses evaluate implementation outcomes, caregiver perceptions of AI-assisted communication, physician acceptance of generated summaries, healthcare utilization outcomes following hospitalization, and operational measures related to AI summary generation.
Statistical analyses will compare outcomes between randomized groups while controlling for relevant covariates when appropriate.
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名：Kristen E Johnson, MD, MS
- 电话号码：571-235-6524
- 邮箱：kejohnson@childrensnational.org
学习地点
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington D.C.、District of Columbia、美国、20010
- 招聘中
- Children's National Hospital
-
接触：
- Kristen Johnson, MD, MS
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria: Caregiver of a patient 10 years and younger admitted to Children's National Hospital, whose preferred language is English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Caregivers of patients older than age 10 years
- Caregivers of patients not admitted to the Hospital Medicine service
- Caregivers of admitted patients whose preferred language is non-English
- Patients whose care summaries are deemed inaccurate by their attending physician and not eligible for sharing with their caregiver.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：卫生服务研究
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
无干预：Standard Hospital Communication
Standard hospital communication |
|
|
实验性的：Standard Hospital Communication Plus AI Care Summary
Attending-approved written AI Care Summary provided to caregiver |
Written AI-generated plain-language summary of the patient's hospital course, reviewed and approved by the attending physician and provided to the caregiver during the hospitalization. |
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Hospital Course Comprehension Score
大体时间：Within 24 hours after receipt of the AI care summary or completion of standard care communication, during the index hospitalization
|
Percentage of caregiver survey responses that align with information documented in the medical record (range 0%-100%; higher scores indicate greater caregiver understanding of the hospital course). |
Within 24 hours after receipt of the AI care summary or completion of standard care communication, during the index hospitalization
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
LOS
大体时间：Throughout study duration, on average one year
|
Length of stay |
Throughout study duration, on average one year
|
|
Readmission
大体时间：During study duration, on average one year
|
7-day and 30-day readmission rates: readmissions within 7 or 30 days of the index hospitalization, when related to problems addressed during the initial hospitalization. |
During study duration, on average one year
|
|
ED reutilization
大体时间：7 days after index hospital discharge and 30 days after index hospital discharge, respectively
|
7-day and 30-day ED re-utilization rates: return visits to the emergency department within 7 or 30 days for complaints related to the initial hospitalization. |
7 days after index hospital discharge and 30 days after index hospital discharge, respectively
|
|
Tokens
大体时间：WIthin 1 hour following generation of each AI care summary (during index hospitalization)
|
Token burden: the number of tokens used per AI-generated care summary. |
WIthin 1 hour following generation of each AI care summary (during index hospitalization)
|
|
Energy usage
大体时间：WIthin 1 hour of generation of the AI care summary (during index hospitalization)
|
Energy use: estimated average kilowatt-hour use per AI-generated summary. |
WIthin 1 hour of generation of the AI care summary (during index hospitalization)
|
|
Acceptability: Physician
大体时间：Within 1 hour of attending physician review of each AI-generated summary, prior to caregiver distribution, during index hospitalization
|
AI care summary rejection rate: the proportion of AI-generated summaries that attending physicians determine are not appropriate to share with caregivers. |
Within 1 hour of attending physician review of each AI-generated summary, prior to caregiver distribution, during index hospitalization
|
|
Reason for Rejection
大体时间：WIthin 1 hour of attending physician review of the AI care summary, during the index hospitalization
|
Reason for rejection: the primary reason an attending rejects a summary. One of five categorical options for rejection (contains sensitive information, contains factual errors, tone is not right, prefer not to provide written information, concerned may cause confusion); or category "other" with a free text response. |
WIthin 1 hour of attending physician review of the AI care summary, during the index hospitalization
|
|
Caregiver-Rated Usefulness of AI Care Summary (5-Point Likert Scale)
大体时间：Within 24 hours after receipt of the AI care summary, during the index hospitalization
|
Caregiver rating of how helpful the AI-generated care summary was for understanding the child's hospitalization, measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Not Helpful at All) to 5 (Extremely Helpful). Higher scores indicate greater perceived usefulness. |
Within 24 hours after receipt of the AI care summary, during the index hospitalization
|
|
Engagement: Caregiver
大体时间：Within 24 hours after receipt of the AI care summary, during the index hospitalization
|
Caregiver interest in AI summaries as standard care: whether caregivers would want this type of summary incorporated into routine care. |
Within 24 hours after receipt of the AI care summary, during the index hospitalization
|
合作者和调查者
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- Greenberg JA, Basapur S, Quinn TV, Bulger JL, Schwartz NH, Oh SK, Ritz EM, Glover CM, Shah RC. Daily Written Care Summaries for Families of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 1;50(9):1296-1305. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005583. Epub 2022 May 23.
- Bedi S, Liu Y, Orr-Ewing L, Dash D, Koyejo S, Callahan A, Fries JA, Wornow M, Swaminathan A, Lehmann LS, Hong HJ, Kashyap M, Chaurasia AR, Shah NR, Singh K, Tazbaz T, Milstein A, Pfeffer MA, Shah NH. Testing and Evaluation of Health Care Applications of Large Language Models: A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2025 Jan 28;333(4):319-328. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.21700.
- Schoonbeek RC, Workum JD, Schuit SCE, Hoekman AH, Mehri T, Doornberg JN, van der Laan TP, Bootsma-Robroeks CMHHT; Applied Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Consortium. Quality and efficiency of integrating customised large language model-generated summaries versus physician-written summaries: a validation study. BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 4;15(9):e099301. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099301.
- Johnson AM, Brimhall AS, Johnson ET, Hodgson J, Didericksen K, Pye J, Harmon GJC, Sewell KB. A systematic review of the effectiveness of patient education through patient portals. JAMIA Open. 2023 Jan 18;6(1):ooac085. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac085. eCollection 2023 Apr.
- Rea KE, Rao P, Hill E, Saylor KM, Cousino MK. Families' Experiences With Pediatric Family-Centered Rounds: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics. 2018 Mar;141(3):e20171883. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1883. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.