Phase I Trial of an Intervention to Increase Condom Use by HIV-Discordant Couples

To assess the acceptability of and participation in a group counseling intervention, including an assessment of willingness to disclose serostatus to a regular sexual partner and the willingness of that partner to participate. To evaluate the profile of adverse experiences (social, psychological, and physical harms) of individuals resulting from participation in counseling and testing and attempts to initiate condom use within a stable HIV serodiscordant partnership. To assess the potential for the intervention to result in increased condom use among stable sexual partners.

There is a significant risk of HIV transmission to HIV-uninfected partners in HIV-discordant couples. While condom use has been a major component of most AIDS prevention programs since the mid-1980s, there has been little emphasis on promoting condom use within stable partnerships. The most effective way to promote condom use among discordant couples remains largely unknown.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

There is a significant risk of HIV transmission to HIV-uninfected partners in HIV-discordant couples. While condom use has been a major component of most AIDS prevention programs since the mid-1980s, there has been little emphasis on promoting condom use within stable partnerships. The most effective way to promote condom use among discordant couples remains largely unknown.

A pilot study to assess the acceptability of intervention precedes the main study. The Phase I study recruits 15 HIV-infected men and 15 HIV-infected women and their partners at each of three sites (India, Thailand, and Uganda). Volunteers participate in a multi-session group-based condom promotion program for approximately 12 months. Couples are organized into small groups consisting of 4 to 6 couples per group. Each group meets for a total of 4 sessions within a 2- to 4-week period. Follow-up interviews are conducted at Months 1 and 3 following completion of the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

Volunteers must be:

  • HIV-positive through HIVNET testing or HIV-seronegative by EIA.
  • Presently in a sexual relationship of at least 6 months duration with the intention to remain with this partner for the duration of the study.
  • Willing to identify and recruit this sexual partner to which he/she has disclosed or will disclose HIV serostatus.
  • Willing to receive counseling and HIV testing (HIV-seronegative partners only).
  • Willing to agree to be interviewed with their partner and individually.
  • Willing to continue engaging in sex with their partner.
  • Willing to participate in a couples-based condom promotion intervention.
  • Willing and able to attend each scheduled intervention/follow-up study visit.

Exclusion Criteria

Volunteers with the following are excluded:

  • History of domestic violence.
  • Current consistent condom use.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: A
All study participants
Participants will engage in a multi-session group-based condom promotion program for approximately 12 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assess acceptability and participation
Time Frame: Throughout study
Throughout study
Assess the potential for the intervention to result in increased condom use among stable sexual partners
Time Frame: Throughout study
Throughout study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assessment of willingness to disclose serostatus to a regular sexual partner and the willingness of that partner to participate
Time Frame: Throughout study
Throughout study
Evaluation of adverse experiences (social, psychological, and physical harms) of individuals resulting from participation in counseling and testing
Time Frame: Throughout study
Throughout study
Evaluation of attempts to initiate condom use within a stable HIV serodiscordant partnership
Time Frame: Throughout study
Throughout study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: David D. Celentano
  • Study Chair: Janet McGrath

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 1999

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 1999

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 1999

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2001

First Posted (Estimate)

August 31, 2001

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Group counseling intervention

Subscribe