Outcomes Following Myocardial Revascularization: On and Off Cardiopulmonary Bypass (ROOBY)

April 18, 2014 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs

CSP #517 - Outcomes Following Myocardial Revascularization: On and Off Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Ischemic heart disease is one of the most frequent diagnoses in the VA system. Moreover, 5,819 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG-only) procedures were performed in the VA in Fiscal Year (FY) 1999. Throughout VA and non-VA cardiac surgery programs nationwide, myocardial revascularization is now being performed using two surgical techniques. One technique is performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) usually with cardioplegic arrest ("on-pump") and the other without CPB on a beating heart ("off-pump"). The overall purpose of this proposed randomized, controlled, clinical trial is to rigorously evaluate the impact of using an on-pump versus off-pump surgical technique for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG-only) procedures (performed with a traditional median sternotomy incision) upon patient clinical outcomes and resource utilization.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary Hypotheses: The study has two primary hypotheses to evaluate the impact of using an off-pump versus an on-pump surgical technique for CABG procedures. One is a short term objective to assess the immediate impact of the two surgical techniques while the second assesses the long-term impact of the two techniques: 1) Short-Term Null Hypothesis: For patients having CABG-only procedures performed, there will be no difference in the short-term composite clinical outcome (30 day death or major morbidity) between patients randomized to the on-pump and off-pump procedures, 2) Long-Term Null Hypothesis: For patients undergoing CABG-only procedures, there will be no difference in long-term clinical outcome as measured by one year mortality and/or acute myocardial infarction prior to one year and/or a subsequent revascularization procedure within one year between patients randomized to the on-pump and off-pump procedures.

Secondary Hypotheses: Major secondary objectives are to determine if there are differences in patients undergoing CABG-only procedures using the on-pump and off-pump techniques for 1) long-term completeness of revascularization, 2) one year graft patency and stenosis rates as determined by angiography at one year, and 3) short-term completeness of revascularization. Other secondary objectives are to evaluate the two surgical techniques on 1) changes in neuropsychological function, 2) traditional clinical outcomes, 3) general and disease specific quality of life, and 4) use of system resources.

Intervention: Patients requiring an elective or urgent CABG-only (no other procedures to be done) surgical procedure will be randomized to either the off-pump procedure or to the on-pump procedure.

Primary Outcomes: The short-term primary outcome measure is a composite measure of death, repeat cardiac surgery, new technical support, cardiac arrest, coma, prolonged stroke and/or renal failure requiring dialyses occurring within 30 days of surgery or prior to discharge, whichever is latest. The long-term primary outcome measure is a composite of death, acute myocardial infarction, and/or subsequent revascularization procedure prior to one year post-surgery.

Study Abstract: Ischemic heart disease is one of the most frequent diagnoses in the VA system. Moreover, 5,819 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG-only) procedures were performed in the VA in FY 1999. Throughout VA and non-VA cardiac surgery programs nationwide, myocardial revascularization is now being performed using two surgical techniques. One technique is performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) usually with cardioplegic arrest ("on-pump") and the other without CPB on a beating heart ("off-pump"). The overall purpose of this proposed randomized, controlled, clinical trial is to rigorously evaluate the impact of using an on-pump versus off-pump surgical technique for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG-only) procedures (performed with a traditional median sternotomy incision) upon patient clinical outcomes and resource utilization.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2203

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304-1290
        • VA Palo Alto Health Care System
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94121
        • VA Medical Center, San Francisco
      • Sepulveda, California, United States, 91343
        • VA Greater Los Angeles HCS, Sepulveda
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80220
        • VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20422
        • VA Medical Center, DC
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32608
        • North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33125
        • VA Medical Center, Miami
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87108-5153
        • New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque
    • North Carolina
      • Asheville, North Carolina, United States, 28805
        • VA Medical Center, Asheville
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • VA Medical Center, Durham
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • VA Medical Center, Cleveland
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97201
        • VA Medical Center, Portland
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15240
        • VA Pittsburgh Health Care System
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75216
        • VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • VA South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53295-1000
        • Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elective or Urgent CABG
  • CABG only procedure to be performed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's surgeon is not a participant that meets study off-pup criteria
  • Valve or Valve/CABG procedure
  • Emergent, hemodynamically unstable, or in cardiogenic shock preoperatively
  • Moderate, moderate, to severe, or severe valvular disease
  • Enrolled in another therapeutic or interventional study
  • Majority of diffusely diseased distal vessels
  • Clinical Care Team has reservations
  • History of on-compliance
  • Patient preference for treatment arm
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Arm 1
Coronary artery bypass - on-pump
CABG procedure performed on heart lung machine
Other: Arm 2
Coronary artery bypass - off-pump
CABG procedure performed without the use of the heart lung machine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short-term End Point
Time Frame: 30 day
Short-term end point was a composite of death or major complications (reoperation, new mechanical support, cardiac arrest, coma, stroke, or renal failure requiring dialysis) occuring within 30 days after surgery or before discharge, whichever was later.
30 day
Long-term Composite
Time Frame: one-year
Long-term composite endpoint was death from any cause within 1 year, nonfatal myocardial infarction between 30 days and 1 year, or repeat revascularization between 30 days and 1 year.
one-year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Frederick Grover, MD, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2002

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2002

First Posted (Estimate)

March 28, 2002

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Heart Disease

Clinical Trials on Coronary artery bypass - on-pump

Subscribe