Study to Determine if Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy is Helpful for Treating Radiation Tissue Injuries

January 11, 2016 updated by: Dick Clarke, National Baromedical Services

Hyperbaric Oxygen Radiation Tissue Injury Study - Project HORTIS

The principle objective of this research is to more precisely determine the degree of benefit that hyperbaric oxygen therapy affords in the treatment of late radiation tissue injury.

The study has eight* components. Seven involve the evaluation of established radionecrosis at varying anatomic sites (mandible, larynx, skin, bladder, rectum, colon, and gyn). The eighth will investigate the potential of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy to prophylax against late radiation tissue injury.

*(One of the arms, HORTIS IV - Proctitis has been closed to further patient recruitment. This decision was based on an interim statistical analysis which generated sufficient evidence to support closing down this arm of HORTIS.)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Radiation therapy is a key component of the control and eradication of malignant disease. Adequate tumoricidal doses may, however, result in damage to surrounding healthy tissue. Therapeutic radiation injuries to non-target tissues can be divided into acute, sub-acute, and delayed complications. Acute injuries are considered a direct cellular toxicity, self-limiting, and in most cases successfully managed symptomatically. Sub-acute injuries are typically identifiable in only a few organ systems, e.g., radiation pneumonitis. These, too, are generally limited but occasionally evolve to late complications. Late changes occur several months to many years after completing radiotherapy.

The etiology of radiation's late effects to normal tissue (LENT) varies somewhat between organ systems. Its hallmark, however, is one of culminating in an obliterative endarteritis, and local hypoxia.

The incidence of LENT is related to both total radiation exposure and the length of time a patient is out from completing radiotherapy. The higher the dose, the longer the interval from exposure, the greater the risk. In many cases, resulting radionecrotic lesions seriously impair form and function, and require extensive surgical correction or repair. Such surgery is fraught with complications, hence the inclusion of a "prophylactic" hyperbaric oxygen arm. A disturbing degree of mortality further complicates the development of LENT.

Hyperbaric oxygen has been utilized in the treatment of radiation tissue injury for several decades. Most of the supportive basic science and clinical evidence stems from the management of mandibular osteoradionecrosis. More recently, the use of hyperbaric oxygen has been extended to other anatomic sites. This expanded use is based, in large part, on a presumed common underlying pathophysiology of LENT, regardless of its anatomic location. Supportive clinical evidence for these other sites is limited, however, and in need of a greater degree of scientific scrutiny.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

248

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Queensland
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4064
        • Wesley Medical Center
    • Tasmania
      • Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 7001
        • Royal Hobart Hospital
      • Mexico City, Mexico, 14080
        • Instituto Nacional de Cancerologica
      • Cape Town, South Africa
        • University of Stellenbosch
      • Pretoria, South Africa, 0001
        • University of Pretoria Medical Center
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34390
        • Istanbul University Medical Center
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29203
        • Palmetto Health Richland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Endarteritis
  • Hypovascularity
  • Diarrhea
  • Cramping
  • Obstruction
  • Stricture
  • Pain
  • Hemorrhage
  • Wall Changes
  • Ulceration
  • Hypocellularity
  • Mucosal thickening
  • Vomiting
  • Tenesmus
  • Constipation
  • Perforation
  • Fistula
  • Obstipation
  • Tissue hypoxia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Reactive airway disease
  • Radiographic evidence of pulmonary blebs or bullae
  • Untreated pneumothorax
  • Previously documented ejection fraction less than 35%
  • History of seizures except childhood febrile seizures
  • Cardiovascular instability
  • Mechanical ventilator support with the exception of those patients who are immediately (1-5 days) post-operative
  • Unable to follow simple commands
  • Not orientated to person, place, time
  • Participating as a subject in any other medical or biomedical research project; if previously involved as a subject, sufficient time must have elapsed to permit "wash out" of any investigational agent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: A
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy
HBO at 2.0 ATA
SHAM_COMPARATOR: B
Normal Air
Normal air under pressure (1.1 ATA)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
SOMA (Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic) scale used to determine late effects to normal tissue (LENT) score
Time Frame: pre-treatment, post-treatment (HBO and placebo) and at follow ups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year through 5 years
pre-treatment, post-treatment (HBO and placebo) and at follow ups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year through 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical assessment using one of the following criteria:
Time Frame: post-treatment (HBO and placebo) and at follow ups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year through 5 years
post-treatment (HBO and placebo) and at follow ups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year through 5 years
Healed
Time Frame: post-treatment (HBO and placebo) and at follow ups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year through 5 years
post-treatment (HBO and placebo) and at follow ups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year through 5 years
Modestly improved (< 50% lesion resolution)
Time Frame: post-treatment (HBO and placebo) and at follow ups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year through 5 years
post-treatment (HBO and placebo) and at follow ups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year through 5 years
Not improved
Time Frame: post-treatment (HBO and placebo) and at follow ups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year through 5 years
post-treatment (HBO and placebo) and at follow ups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year through 5 years
Other (e.g. lesion recurrence, lesion size progression)
Time Frame: post-treatment (HBO and placebo) and at follow ups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year through 5 years
post-treatment (HBO and placebo) and at follow ups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year through 5 years
Significant Improvement (>50% lesion resolution)
Time Frame: post-treatment (HBO and placebo) and at follow ups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year through 5 years
post-treatment (HBO and placebo) and at follow ups at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year through 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dick Clarke, CHT, National Baromedical Services

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2001

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2005

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 25, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 12, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Project HORTIS
  • ISRCTN85456814

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe