Study to Characterize Atrial Fibrillation in CHF Patients Indicated for CRT

November 3, 2008 updated by: Medtronic BRC

Congestive Heart Failure Atrial Arrhythmia Monitoring and Pacing (CHAMP)

The purpose of the study is to characterize atrial arrhythmias in patients indicated for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) and to monitor changes in atrial arrhythmias while CRT is provided.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The combination of congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation is a common co morbidity, although the exact prevalence of AF in the heart failure population is still unclear. Recent studies show a prevalence of AF ranging from about 10% to 50%, although the type of AF observed and investigated in these studies is not always clearly described.

A number of mechanisms attributed to congestive heart failure may contribute to the development of AF Experimental congestive heart failure promotes sustained AF by ionic remodeling and increased interstitial fibrosis. In contrast to tachycardia-mediated AF, in congestive heart failure no shortening of atrial refractoriness occurs. Atrial tissue stress caused by congestive heart failure may also contribute to promotion of AF by inducing triggered activity, affecting atrial refractoriness properties or resulting in increased tissue mass supporting re-entry [31]. Existence of these mechanisms suggests that treatment of congestive heart failure may also influence the development and progression of AF in these patients. Conversion of chronic AF has been observed in patients with congestive heart failure treated with biventricular pacing Ventricular ionic remodeling likely underlies the increased risk for proarrhythmia in heart failure patients exposed to antiarrhythmic drugs, prolonging the action potential duration , which therefore should be avoided in patients with congestive heart failure.

The independent prognostic significance of AF in heart failure patients is still not completely clear. Results from some recent studies suggest no independent prognostic significance of AF in heart failure patients Result from other large studies on congestive heart failure suggest an independent prognostic effect of AF in patients with AF and congestive heart failure, associated with an increased risk for pump failure death and all-cause mortality a significantly reduced 1-year survival and a higher mortality among heart failure patients who developed AF A recent review with regard to the mortality in studies on congestive heart failure suggests that concomitant AF does not have an additional effect on the mortality in patients with severe heart failure, but does increase the mortality in the setting of mild-to-moderate heart failure This observation may be attributed to the fact that the atrial contribution to left ventricular filling is limited in patients with severe diastolic dysfunction, whereas the atrial contribution may still be of hemodynamic importance in mild-to-moderate heart failure

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

172

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brno, Czech Republic, 65691
        • Fakultni nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brne
      • Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic, 708 52
        • Fakultni nemocnice s poliklinikou Ostrava
      • Praha, Czech Republic, 140 21
        • Institut klinicke a experimentalni mediciny
      • Praha, Czech Republic, 150 30
        • Nemocnice na Homolce
      • Aix-en-Provence, France, 13160
        • Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix
      • Angers, France, 49033
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Chru - Hôpital Cardiologique
      • Lomme, France, 59462
        • Centre Hospitalier Saint Philibert
      • Lyon, France, 69394
        • Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel
      • Nantes, France, 44277
        • Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises
      • Neuilly-Sur-Seine, France, 92200
        • Centre Medico-Chirurgical Ambroise Pare
      • Pau, France, 64046
        • Centre hospitalier
      • Pessac, France, 33604
        • Hôpital Cardiologique Du Haut-Levêque - Chu
      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • Hôpital Pontchaillou - CHU
      • Saint-Cloud, France, 92211
        • Centre Chirurgical Du Val D'Or
      • Toulouse, France, 92211
        • Clinique Pasteur
      • Firenze, Italy, 50134
        • Ospedale di Careggi
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Academisch Medisch Centrum
      • Deventer, Netherlands, 7451 CM
        • Deventer Ziekenhuis
      • Tilburg, Netherlands, 5042 AD
        • TweeSteden Ziekenhuis
      • Belgrade, Serbia, 11000
        • Klinicki Centar Srbije
      • Bratislava, Slovakia, 83348
        • Slovenský Ústav Srdcových A Cievnych Chorôb
      • Chertsey, United Kingdom, KT 16 OPZ
        • St. Peters Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol
  • Patient is willing to sign written informed consent
  • Patient is expected to remain available for Follow-up visits
  • Patient age is 18 years and older
  • patient is on a stable medication regimen (including beta blockers) for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment
  • Baseline criteria: patients should meet all of the following criteria, to be determined at the baseline assessment procedure within 4 weeks prior to device implantation: - New York Heart Association functional classification III or IV
  • QRS duration > 130 ms
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction < 35% measured by echocardiography left ventricular end diastolic dimension > 55 mm measured by echocardiography

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with unstable angina or who have experienced an acute myocardial infarction or received coronary artery revascularization (CABG) or coronary angioplasty (PTCA) within 3 months prior to enrollment or who are candidates for CABG or PTCA
  • Patients who have experienced CVA or TIA with permanent disability within 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Patient on, or anticipated to require, intravenous inotropic drug therapy
  • Patients with severe primary pulmonary disease (such as cor pulmonale)
  • Post heart transplant patients and patients on an urgency list for cardiac transplantation
  • Supine systolic blood pressure greater than 170 mm
  • Patient who are not expected to survive for 8 months of study participation due to other medical conditions
  • Women who are pregnant or with child bearing potential and who are not on a reliable form of birth control
  • Serum creatinine greater than 250 mol/l
  • Untreated hyperthyroidism
  • Patients enrolled in any concurrent (drug and/or device) study
  • Patients with an existing implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or indications for an ICD including those patients with sustained VT within the previous month
  • Patients with permanent atrial arrhythmias. Permanent atrial arrhythmia is defined as an arrhythmia for which any possible type of cardioversion is not considered or that is recurrent within 24 hours from an attempted cardioversion
  • Patients with contraindications for implantation of a cardiac pacing device
  • Patients who are already implanted with a cardiac pacing device for purposes other than Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
AF burden at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
NYHA class,
Ejection Fraction,
all cause and sudden death,
QRS duration,
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension,
QT interval and
T wave amplitude

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Bert Albers, Ms Sc PhD, Medtronic BRC
  • Principal Investigator: Christophe Leclercq, MD PhD, Departement de Cardiologie et Maladies Vasculaires CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2003

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 4, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2008

Last Verified

November 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe