Use of Sucrose to Relieve Pain During Eye Exams in Infants

Effectiveness of an Oral Sucrose Solution in Reducing Pain and Anxiety Associated With Neonatal Ophthalmologic Examination

The purpose of this study is to see if an oral sucrose solution can comfort premature infants during their necessary eye exams. The investigators believe that the use of this solution prior to the eye exams will lead to a decrease in pain as measured by a rise in heart rate and a fall in oxygen saturation. In addition this will lead to a decrease in events in the 12 hours following examination. Events include episodes when the infants temporarily stop breathing, have a drop in their heart rates, or have a drop in their oxygen levels.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • NYPH - Weill Cornell Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 month and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All premature infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit requiring serial dilated examinations to assess for retinopathy of prematurity will be candidates for this study. This includes all infants with a birthweight of less than 1500 g and infants between 1500 g and 2000 g who require supplemental oxygen.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any infant who is unable to safely suckle 0.5 cc of fluid will be excluded from the study. This includes infants that are being maintained on ventilators and those with serious gastrointestinal complications that may be exacerbated by an oral fluid bolus.
  • Any infant being maintained on narcotics for any reason will not be eligible for the study.
  • All infants with major congenital anomalies will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tamara L Rousseau, MD, Neonatology Fellow at NYPH-Weill Cornell Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • 1 American Academy of Pediatrics: screening Examination of Premature Infants for Retinopathy of Prematurity. Pediatrics 2001;108:809-811. 2 Laws DE,C Morton, MWeindling, D Clark. Systemic effects of screening for retinopathy of prematurity. Br J Opthalmol 1996;80:425-428. 3 Kumar H, S Naniwal, USingha, E Azad, VK Paul. Stress induced by screening for retinopathy of prematurity. J Pediatr Opthalmology and Strabismus. 2002;39:349-350. 4 Aguirre Rodriguez FJ, A Bonilla Perales, J Diez-Delgado Rubio, M Gonzales-Ripoll Garzon, J Arcos Martinez, J Lopez Munoz. An Pediatr (Barc) 2003;58:504-505. 5 Slevin M, JFA Murphy, L Daly, m o'Keefe. Retinopathy of prematurity screening, stress related response, the role of nesting. Br J Opthalmol 1997;81:762-764. 6 Als H, G Lawhon, E Brown et al. Individualized behavior and environmental care for the VLBW preterm infant at high risk for BPD: NICU and developmental outcome. Pediatrics 1986;78:1123-1132. 7 Stevens B, J Yamada, A Ohlsson. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004. 8 Benis MM. Efficacy of sucrose analgesia for procedural pain in neonates. Dv Neonatal Care. 2002;2:93-100. 9 Masters-Harte LD. Sucrose analgesia for minor procedures in newborn infants. Ann Pharmacother 2001;35:947-952. 10 Akman I, EOzek, H Bilgen, T Ozgodan, D Cebeci. Sweet solutions and pacifiers for pain relief in newborn infants. The Journal of Pain 2002:3. 11 Blass EM. Behavioral and physiological consequences of suckling in rat and human newborns. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1994;397:71-76. 12 Campos RG. Soothing pain-elicited distress in infants with swaddling and pacifiers. Child Dev 1989;60:781-792. 13 Blass EM. Suckling and sucrose-induced analgesia in human newborns. Pain 1999;83:611-623. 14 Carbajal R, R Lenclen, V Gadjos, M Jugic, A Paupe. Crossover trial of analgesic efficacy of glucose and pacifier in very preterm neonates during subcutaneous injections. Pediatrics 2002;110:389-393. 15 Blass EM. Milk induced hypoalgesia in human newborns. Pediatrics 1997;99:825-829. 16 Carbajal R, S Veerapen, S Coulder, M Jugie, Y Ville. Analgesic effect of breast-feeding in term neonates: randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal 2003;326:13. 17 Guala A. Glucose or sucrose as an analgesic for newborns: a randomized controlled blind trial. Minerva Pediatr 2001;53:271-274. 18 Anseloni VC. Age-dependency of analgesia elicited by intraoral sucrose in acute and persistent pain models. Pain 2002;97:93-103. 19 Willis D, J Chabot, I Radde, G Chance. Unsuspected hyperosmolality of oral solutions contributing to necrotizing enterocolitis in very-low-birth-weight infants. Pediatrics 1997;60:535-538. 20 American Academy of Pediatrics. Prevention and Management of Pain and Stress in the Neonate. Pediatrics 2000;105:454-461. 21 Morison S, R Grunau, T Oberlander, F Tim, M Whitfield. Relations between behavioral and cardiac autonomic reactivity to acute pain in preterm neonates. Clinical Journal of Pain 2001;17:350-358.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 4, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2008

Last Verified

June 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe